The value of machine learning inference to predict multidisciplinary discussion diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases.

Eduardo J Mortani Barbosa, Yohan Kim, Justin Shanahan, Alex Rupsee
{"title":"The value of machine learning inference to predict multidisciplinary discussion diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases.","authors":"Eduardo J Mortani Barbosa, Yohan Kim, Justin Shanahan, Alex Rupsee","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2026.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) is the reference standard for diagnosing interstitial lung diseases (ILD), however, it requires considerable expertise, and up to 25% of patients remain unclassifiable. We evaluated whether machine learning (ML) models trained on multimodal data can accurately replicate MDD consensus ILD diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified 428 patients with ILD confirmed by MDD consensus at a tertiary academic center from 2010 to 2021. Using comprehensive clinical and radiological data, we trained and cross-validated multiple ML models for three classifications: (1) three-level: connective tissue disease associated ILD (CTD-ILD), usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), or unclassifiable; (2) UIP/IPF versus all other, and (3) unclassifiable versus all other. Logistic regression, random forest, and neural networks ML models were trained with five-fold cross-validation. Performance was compared via area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MDD diagnoses were UIP/IPF in 131 patients (30.6%), CTD-ILD in 130 (30.4%), and unclassifiable ILD in 167 (39.0%). Clinical variables and CT imaging features were more predictive than PFTs. ML models achieved AUC values ranging from 0.66 to 0.92. For UIP/IPF vs. other, the neural network reached an AUC of 0.88. Notably, the Lasso regression model exhibited high specificity (0.966), suggesting utility as a high-confidence \"rule-in\" AI tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML classification closely approximated MDD diagnoses of ILD, especially for UIP/IPF, relying primarily on clinical and CT imaging features, even without pathology information, allowing expert-level diagnostic performance where MDD resources are not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":93969,"journal":{"name":"Current problems in diagnostic radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current problems in diagnostic radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2026.09.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) is the reference standard for diagnosing interstitial lung diseases (ILD), however, it requires considerable expertise, and up to 25% of patients remain unclassifiable. We evaluated whether machine learning (ML) models trained on multimodal data can accurately replicate MDD consensus ILD diagnoses.

Materials & methods: We retrospectively identified 428 patients with ILD confirmed by MDD consensus at a tertiary academic center from 2010 to 2021. Using comprehensive clinical and radiological data, we trained and cross-validated multiple ML models for three classifications: (1) three-level: connective tissue disease associated ILD (CTD-ILD), usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), or unclassifiable; (2) UIP/IPF versus all other, and (3) unclassifiable versus all other. Logistic regression, random forest, and neural networks ML models were trained with five-fold cross-validation. Performance was compared via area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: MDD diagnoses were UIP/IPF in 131 patients (30.6%), CTD-ILD in 130 (30.4%), and unclassifiable ILD in 167 (39.0%). Clinical variables and CT imaging features were more predictive than PFTs. ML models achieved AUC values ranging from 0.66 to 0.92. For UIP/IPF vs. other, the neural network reached an AUC of 0.88. Notably, the Lasso regression model exhibited high specificity (0.966), suggesting utility as a high-confidence "rule-in" AI tool.

Conclusion: ML classification closely approximated MDD diagnoses of ILD, especially for UIP/IPF, relying primarily on clinical and CT imaging features, even without pathology information, allowing expert-level diagnostic performance where MDD resources are not available.

机器学习推理在预测间质性肺疾病多学科讨论诊断中的价值。
目的:多学科讨论(MDD)是诊断间质性肺疾病(ILD)的参考标准,然而,它需要相当多的专业知识,高达25%的患者仍然无法分类。我们评估了在多模态数据上训练的机器学习(ML)模型是否可以准确地复制MDD一致的ILD诊断。材料和方法:2010年至2021年,我们在一个三级学术中心回顾性地确定了428例经MDD共识确诊的ILD患者。使用全面的临床和放射学数据,我们训练并交叉验证了三个分类的多个ML模型:(1)三个级别:结缔组织疾病相关ILD (CTD-ILD),通常间质性肺炎(UIP)或不可分类;(2) UIP/IPF与所有其他,(3)不可分类与所有其他。逻辑回归、随机森林和神经网络ML模型用五重交叉验证进行训练。通过曲线下面积(AUC)进行性能比较,置信区间为95%。结果:MDD诊断为UIP/IPF 131例(30.6%),CTD-ILD 130例(30.4%),ILD 167例(39.0%)。临床变量和CT影像特征比PFTs更具预测性。ML模型的AUC值范围为0.66至0.92。对于UIP/IPF和other,神经网络的AUC达到0.88。值得注意的是,Lasso回归模型具有高特异性(0.966),表明它是一种高置信度的“规则”人工智能工具。结论:ML分类与ILD的MDD诊断非常接近,特别是对于UIP/IPF,主要依赖于临床和CT成像特征,即使没有病理信息,也可以在没有MDD资源的情况下进行专家级诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书