Calibration and count rate performance of NaI(Tl) gamma counters for quantifying the activity 89Zr radiopharmaceuticals

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Michael Silosky
{"title":"Calibration and count rate performance of NaI(Tl) gamma counters for quantifying the activity 89Zr radiopharmaceuticals","authors":"Michael Silosky","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Quantification of low activity samples using gamma counters is a common technique when investigating the biodistribution of experimental radiopharmaceuticals. Several human and pre-clinical trials have investigated <sup>89</sup>Zr labeled compounds, utilizing gamma counter to quantify activity in blood or animal samples. While the performance of gamma counters has been investigated for other positron emitting radionuclides, the more complex spectrum, including a 909 keV gamma emission, and low positron fraction of <sup>89</sup>Zr may reduce both counting efficiency while increasing the severity of count rate losses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of this study is to evaluate both the counting efficiency and the effect of count rate losses on the quantitation of activity for <sup>89</sup>Zr using NaI(Tl) gamma counters.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Sources of known activity (initially 78.3 kBq) were measured in a gamma counter as they decayed over approximately 15 days. Observed count rates were fit with a paralyzable detector model for two separate energy windows, 511 keV ± 10% and 909 keV ± 10%, as well as their sum. Counting efficiency in the absence of losses as well as the effective deadtime for each dataset were calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Count rates for each energy window were well fit with a paralyzable model with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.999. Counting efficiency (mean ± 95% confidence interval) was 10.07% ± 0.07%, 17.38% ± 0.13%, and 27.46% ± 0.16% for the 511 keV, 909 keV, and summed energy windows respectively. Effective dead time (mean, 95% confidence interval) was 14.31 µs, (13.30 µs–15.30 µs), 7.11 µs (6.68 µs–7.55 µs), and 4.77 µs (4.48 µs–5.06 µs) for the 511 keV, 909 keV, and summed energy windows respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Counting efficiency and count rate performance for <sup>89</sup>Zr are poorer than for other positron emitting radionuclides. Count rate losses follow the paralyzable model and are correctible.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70788","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70788","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Quantification of low activity samples using gamma counters is a common technique when investigating the biodistribution of experimental radiopharmaceuticals. Several human and pre-clinical trials have investigated 89Zr labeled compounds, utilizing gamma counter to quantify activity in blood or animal samples. While the performance of gamma counters has been investigated for other positron emitting radionuclides, the more complex spectrum, including a 909 keV gamma emission, and low positron fraction of 89Zr may reduce both counting efficiency while increasing the severity of count rate losses.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate both the counting efficiency and the effect of count rate losses on the quantitation of activity for 89Zr using NaI(Tl) gamma counters.

Methods

Sources of known activity (initially 78.3 kBq) were measured in a gamma counter as they decayed over approximately 15 days. Observed count rates were fit with a paralyzable detector model for two separate energy windows, 511 keV ± 10% and 909 keV ± 10%, as well as their sum. Counting efficiency in the absence of losses as well as the effective deadtime for each dataset were calculated.

Results

Count rates for each energy window were well fit with a paralyzable model with R2 > 0.999. Counting efficiency (mean ± 95% confidence interval) was 10.07% ± 0.07%, 17.38% ± 0.13%, and 27.46% ± 0.16% for the 511 keV, 909 keV, and summed energy windows respectively. Effective dead time (mean, 95% confidence interval) was 14.31 µs, (13.30 µs–15.30 µs), 7.11 µs (6.68 µs–7.55 µs), and 4.77 µs (4.48 µs–5.06 µs) for the 511 keV, 909 keV, and summed energy windows respectively.

Conclusion

Counting efficiency and count rate performance for 89Zr are poorer than for other positron emitting radionuclides. Count rate losses follow the paralyzable model and are correctible.

用于定量89Zr放射性药物活性的NaI(Tl)计数器的校准和计数率性能
在研究实验放射性药物的生物分布时,使用伽马计数器对低活性样品进行定量是一种常用的技术。一些人类和临床前试验已经研究了89Zr标记的化合物,利用伽马计数器来量化血液或动物样本中的活性。虽然已经研究了其他正电子发射放射性核素的伽马计数器的性能,但更复杂的光谱,包括909 keV的伽马发射,以及89Zr的低正电子分数,可能会降低计数效率,同时增加计数率损失的严重程度。本研究的目的是评价计数效率和计数率损失对NaI(Tl) γ计数器定量89Zr活性的影响。方法已知活度源(最初为78.3 kBq)在衰变约15天后用伽马计数器测量。在511 keV±10%和909 keV±10%两个单独的能量窗下,用可麻痹检测器模型拟合观察到的计数率及其总和。计算了无损失情况下的计数效率以及每个数据集的有效死区时间。结果各能量窗计数率与麻痹模型拟合良好,R2 > 0.999。511 keV、909 keV和和能窗的计数效率(平均值±95%置信区间)分别为10.07%±0.07%、17.38%±0.13%和27.46%±0.16%。511 keV、909 keV和和能窗的有效死区时间(平均值,95%置信区间)分别为14.31µs、13.30µs - 15.30µs、7.11µs(6.68µs - 7.55µs)和4.77µs(4.48µs - 5.06µs)。结论89Zr的计数效率和计数率性能较其他正电子放射核素差。计数率损失遵循可麻痹模型,是可修正的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书