Clinical Characteristics and Timing of Accessory Pathway Reconduction During Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathways

IF 1.9 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Wataru Sasaki, Hitoshi Mori, Daisuke Kawano, Kei Matsumoto, Naomichi Tanaka, Tsukasa Naganuma, Masataka Narita, Kazuhisa Matsumoto, Yoshifumi Ikeda, Takahide Arai, Shintaro Nakano, Ritsushi Kato
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics and Timing of Accessory Pathway Reconduction During Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathways","authors":"Wataru Sasaki,&nbsp;Hitoshi Mori,&nbsp;Daisuke Kawano,&nbsp;Kei Matsumoto,&nbsp;Naomichi Tanaka,&nbsp;Tsukasa Naganuma,&nbsp;Masataka Narita,&nbsp;Kazuhisa Matsumoto,&nbsp;Yoshifumi Ikeda,&nbsp;Takahide Arai,&nbsp;Shintaro Nakano,&nbsp;Ritsushi Kato","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Catheter ablation of accessory pathways has high acute success rates; however, accessory pathway (AP) recurrence remains a clinically relevant issue. Although intra-procedural AP reconduction is frequently encountered during ablation procedures, its timing, predictors, and clinical significance remain insufficiently characterized.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate the timing, electrophysiologic characteristics, and clinical implications of intra-procedural AP reconduction during catheter ablation of manifest and concealed accessory pathways.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analyzed 128 patients with manifest or concealed AP who underwent catheter ablation at our institution between May 28, 2015, and February 2025. Details of cases in which AP reconduction was observed during the 30 min waiting period after successful ablation, including clinical and procedural characteristics, were compared with those of patients without reconduction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Intra-procedural AP reconduction occurred in 23 patients (18.0%). The mean time to reconduction was 16.7 ± 7.0 min, with a maximum interval of 27 min. Compared with patients without reconduction, those with reconduction had a significantly longer time to pathway interruption, more frequent broad or oblique APs, and more complex procedural approaches requiring multiple anatomical access routes. Intra-procedural reconduction was also associated with subsequent late recurrence. Fifteen of 23 events (65.2%) occurred ≥ 15 min after AP elimination.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Intra-procedural AP reconduction during catheter ablation of accessory pathways is not uncommon and appears to be associated with specific electrophysiologic and procedural characteristics as well as late recurrence. These findings may facilitate identification of patients at higher risk of reconduction and help guide intra-procedural assessment during catheter ablation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"42 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70469","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Catheter ablation of accessory pathways has high acute success rates; however, accessory pathway (AP) recurrence remains a clinically relevant issue. Although intra-procedural AP reconduction is frequently encountered during ablation procedures, its timing, predictors, and clinical significance remain insufficiently characterized.

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the timing, electrophysiologic characteristics, and clinical implications of intra-procedural AP reconduction during catheter ablation of manifest and concealed accessory pathways.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 128 patients with manifest or concealed AP who underwent catheter ablation at our institution between May 28, 2015, and February 2025. Details of cases in which AP reconduction was observed during the 30 min waiting period after successful ablation, including clinical and procedural characteristics, were compared with those of patients without reconduction.

Results

Intra-procedural AP reconduction occurred in 23 patients (18.0%). The mean time to reconduction was 16.7 ± 7.0 min, with a maximum interval of 27 min. Compared with patients without reconduction, those with reconduction had a significantly longer time to pathway interruption, more frequent broad or oblique APs, and more complex procedural approaches requiring multiple anatomical access routes. Intra-procedural reconduction was also associated with subsequent late recurrence. Fifteen of 23 events (65.2%) occurred ≥ 15 min after AP elimination.

Conclusions

Intra-procedural AP reconduction during catheter ablation of accessory pathways is not uncommon and appears to be associated with specific electrophysiologic and procedural characteristics as well as late recurrence. These findings may facilitate identification of patients at higher risk of reconduction and help guide intra-procedural assessment during catheter ablation.

导管消融术中旁道再传导的临床特征及时机
背景:副道导管消融急性成功率高;然而,副通路(AP)复发仍然是一个与临床相关的问题。虽然术中AP再传导在消融过程中经常发生,但其时间、预测因素和临床意义仍未得到充分的描述。目的本研究旨在探讨导管消融过程中明显和隐蔽副通路术内AP再传导的时间、电生理特征和临床意义。方法回顾性分析2015年5月28日至2025年2月在我院行导管消融治疗的128例明显或隐蔽性AP患者。在消融成功后30分钟等待期间观察到AP再传导的病例的细节,包括临床和程序特征,与未观察到AP再传导的患者进行比较。结果术中AP再传导23例(18.0%)。平均再传导时间为16.7±7.0 min,最大间隔时间为27 min。与无再传导的患者相比,有再传导的患者通路中断的时间明显更长,更频繁地出现宽ap或斜ap,手术入路更复杂,需要多种解剖通路。术内再传导也与随后的晚期复发有关。23例事件中有15例(65.2%)发生在AP消除后≥15分钟。结论:旁路导管消融过程中术内AP再传导并不罕见,且与特定的电生理和手术特征以及晚期复发有关。这些发现可能有助于识别再传导风险较高的患者,并有助于指导导管消融过程中的术中评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书