Conspecific Negative Distance-Dependence and New Zealand Podocarp Forest Dynamics

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Austral Ecology Pub Date : 2026-09-15 DOI:10.1111/aec.70291
Christopher H. Lusk, Craig J. MacDonell, Selwyn R. June
{"title":"Conspecific Negative Distance-Dependence and New Zealand Podocarp Forest Dynamics","authors":"Christopher H. Lusk,&nbsp;Craig J. MacDonell,&nbsp;Selwyn R. June","doi":"10.1111/aec.70291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Janzen-Connell hypothesis proposed that conspecific negative density or distance dependence (CNDDD) helps maintain the species richness of tropical rainforests through the action of specialist natural enemies that suppress conspecific recruitment beneath canopy trees. Empirical studies have since shown that CNDDD occurs not only in tropical rainforests but in a wide range of other vegetation types. Studies of CNDDD have invariably focused on its implications for species coexistence and diversity; rarely has its potential relevance to successional replacement patterns been explored. Here we present evidence for CNDDD that may shed new light on a long-standing problem in New Zealand forest dynamics—the failure of relatively shade-tolerant conifers (in particular <i>Dacrydium cupressinum</i>, Podocarpaceae) to regenerate beneath their own canopies in dense podocarp stands. We mapped tree positions on a 3-ha plot in a central North Island podocarp/broadleaf forest in which diameter distributions indicated two discrete cohorts of <i>D. cupressinum</i> trees and used pair-correlation functions to measure hetero- and conspecific spatial associations between small and large trees. Small trees (5–60 cm diameter) of <i>D. cupressinum</i> were significantly negatively associated with large conspecific trees of the older cohort at radii of up to 7 m. This pattern cannot readily be explained by light requirements, as small trees of a less shade-tolerant podocarp (<i>Phyllocladus trichomanoides</i>) were distributed independently of large <i>D. cupressinum</i>. Small trees of the only other species well-represented by large diameters (the broadleaved species <i>Elaeocarpus dentatus</i>, Elaeocarpaceae) were also negatively associated with large conspecific trees, albeit across a narrower range of radii. Our results suggest CNDDD might contribute to the characteristic failure of <i>D. cupressinum</i> to regenerate in central North Island dense podocarp stands, regeneration resuming only when attrition or exogenous disturbance reduces the <i>D. cupressinum</i> overstorey to scattered emergent trees.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"51 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70291","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Janzen-Connell hypothesis proposed that conspecific negative density or distance dependence (CNDDD) helps maintain the species richness of tropical rainforests through the action of specialist natural enemies that suppress conspecific recruitment beneath canopy trees. Empirical studies have since shown that CNDDD occurs not only in tropical rainforests but in a wide range of other vegetation types. Studies of CNDDD have invariably focused on its implications for species coexistence and diversity; rarely has its potential relevance to successional replacement patterns been explored. Here we present evidence for CNDDD that may shed new light on a long-standing problem in New Zealand forest dynamics—the failure of relatively shade-tolerant conifers (in particular Dacrydium cupressinum, Podocarpaceae) to regenerate beneath their own canopies in dense podocarp stands. We mapped tree positions on a 3-ha plot in a central North Island podocarp/broadleaf forest in which diameter distributions indicated two discrete cohorts of D. cupressinum trees and used pair-correlation functions to measure hetero- and conspecific spatial associations between small and large trees. Small trees (5–60 cm diameter) of D. cupressinum were significantly negatively associated with large conspecific trees of the older cohort at radii of up to 7 m. This pattern cannot readily be explained by light requirements, as small trees of a less shade-tolerant podocarp (Phyllocladus trichomanoides) were distributed independently of large D. cupressinum. Small trees of the only other species well-represented by large diameters (the broadleaved species Elaeocarpus dentatus, Elaeocarpaceae) were also negatively associated with large conspecific trees, albeit across a narrower range of radii. Our results suggest CNDDD might contribute to the characteristic failure of D. cupressinum to regenerate in central North Island dense podocarp stands, regeneration resuming only when attrition or exogenous disturbance reduces the D. cupressinum overstorey to scattered emergent trees.

同种负距离依赖与新西兰袋鲤森林动态
Janzen-Connell假说提出,同种负密度或距离依赖(CNDDD)有助于维持热带雨林的物种丰富度,通过抑制冠层树下同种补充的特殊天敌的作用。此后的实证研究表明,CNDDD不仅发生在热带雨林中,也发生在许多其他植被类型中。CNDDD的研究总是集中在其对物种共存和多样性的影响上;很少探讨其与演替模式的潜在关联。在这里,我们提出了CNDDD的证据,这可能会为新西兰森林动态中一个长期存在的问题提供新的线索——相对耐阴的针叶树(特别是Dacrydium cupressinum, Podocarpaceae)在茂密的podocarp林分中无法在自己的树冠下再生。我们在北岛中部的一个3公顷的松/阔叶林地块上绘制了树木的位置图,其中直径分布显示了两个离散的柏树群,并使用对相关函数来测量小树和大树之间的异种和同种空间关联。柏树的小树(直径5-60 cm)与年龄大的同株树在半径达7 m处呈显著负相关。这种模式不能轻易地用光照需求来解释,因为一种不耐阴的竹科植物(Phyllocladus trichomanoides)的小树独立于大柏树分布。其他唯一以大直径为代表的物种(阔叶树种Elaeocarpus dentatus, Elaeocarpaceae)的小树也与大的同种树负相关,尽管半径范围较窄。我们的研究结果表明,CNDDD可能是北岛中部茂密的柏树林特有的再生失败的原因之一,只有当损耗或外源干扰使柏树的上层减少到分散的新兴树木时,再生才能恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Austral Ecology
Austral Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere. Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region. Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书