Reorganising the conditions of participation: Effects of differentiated instruction on the social dimension of inclusive education

IF 1.8 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Ilias Vasileiadis, Ioanna Dimitriadou, Spyros Koutras
{"title":"Reorganising the conditions of participation: Effects of differentiated instruction on the social dimension of inclusive education","authors":"Ilias Vasileiadis,&nbsp;Ioanna Dimitriadou,&nbsp;Spyros Koutras","doi":"10.1111/1471-3802.70165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines the effectiveness of a structured Differentiated Instruction (DI) programme, implemented as a universal practice for learning “Differentiation for All”, in enhancing the social dimension of inclusive education for students with mild intellectual disabilities in second and third-grade inclusive primary classrooms. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, using a pre–post design with an intervention and a comparison group. The study included 32 students with mild intellectual disabilities, 202 typically developing peers, and 30 general-education teachers. Data were collected through systematic observations, sociometric techniques, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative findings showed that after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in social interaction with typically developing peers and an improvement in social acceptance, whereas the comparison group showed no comparable changes. Qualitative data indicated a trend toward increased perceived peer support, particularly in terms of invitations to participate, positive attention, and greater participation in school activities. Students' and teachers' narratives linked these changes to flexible grouping strategies, collaborative roles, shared outputs, accessible materials, and clear and cooperative routines. Overall, the findings suggest that the implementation of DI as a systematic and non-stigmatising universal practice within the context of environmental studies may contribute to enhancing social participation and school inclusion for students with mild intellectual disabilities in inclusive primary classrooms.</p>","PeriodicalId":46783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-3802.70165","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-3802.70165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of a structured Differentiated Instruction (DI) programme, implemented as a universal practice for learning “Differentiation for All”, in enhancing the social dimension of inclusive education for students with mild intellectual disabilities in second and third-grade inclusive primary classrooms. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, using a pre–post design with an intervention and a comparison group. The study included 32 students with mild intellectual disabilities, 202 typically developing peers, and 30 general-education teachers. Data were collected through systematic observations, sociometric techniques, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative findings showed that after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in social interaction with typically developing peers and an improvement in social acceptance, whereas the comparison group showed no comparable changes. Qualitative data indicated a trend toward increased perceived peer support, particularly in terms of invitations to participate, positive attention, and greater participation in school activities. Students' and teachers' narratives linked these changes to flexible grouping strategies, collaborative roles, shared outputs, accessible materials, and clear and cooperative routines. Overall, the findings suggest that the implementation of DI as a systematic and non-stigmatising universal practice within the context of environmental studies may contribute to enhancing social participation and school inclusion for students with mild intellectual disabilities in inclusive primary classrooms.

重构参与条件:差别化教学对全纳教育社会维度的影响
本研究考察了结构化差异化教学(DI)计划的有效性,该计划作为学习“人人差异化”的普遍做法,在二年级和三年级的全纳小学课堂上加强轻度智障学生的全纳教育的社会层面。采用混合方法,采用前后设计,干预和对照组。这项研究包括32名轻度智障学生、202名正常发展的同龄人和30名通识教育教师。通过系统观察、社会计量技术和半结构化访谈收集数据。定量研究结果显示,干预后,干预组与正常发育同伴的社会交往有统计学意义的增加,社会接受度也有改善,而对照组没有类似的变化。定性数据表明,感知同伴支持的趋势有所增加,特别是在邀请参与、积极关注和更多地参与学校活动方面。学生和教师的叙述将这些变化与灵活的分组策略、协作角色、共享产出、可获取的材料以及清晰的合作惯例联系起来。总体而言,研究结果表明,在环境研究的背景下,将残障学生作为一种系统的、非污名化的普遍做法实施,可能有助于在包容性小学课堂中提高轻度智障学生的社会参与和学校融合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs (JORSEN) is an established online forum for the dissemination of international research on special educational needs. JORSEN aims to: Publish original research, literature reviews and theoretical papers on meeting special educational needs Create an international forum for researchers to reflect on, and share ideas regarding, issues of particular importance to them such as methodology, research design and ethical issues Reach a wide multi-disciplinary national and international audience through online publication Authors are invited to submit reports of original research, reviews of research and scholarly papers on methodology, research design and ethical issues. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs will provide essential reading for those working in the special educational needs field wherever that work takes place around the world. It will be of particular interest to those working in: Research Teaching and learning support Policymaking Administration and supervision Educational psychology Advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书