Should Robot Arms Be Thicc or Thinn? Examining The Impact of Shape Characteristics on Human Perceptions of Robot Arms.

Rhian C Preston, Stayce Mockel, Naomi T Fitter
{"title":"Should Robot Arms Be Thicc or Thinn? Examining The Impact of Shape Characteristics on Human Perceptions of Robot Arms.","authors":"Rhian C Preston, Stayce Mockel, Naomi T Fitter","doi":"10.1007/978-981-96-3519-1_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The appearance of a robot is generally understood to affect human perception of the robot, yet the majority of investigation into the impact of robot form has focused on humanoid robots and robot size. To better understand the impact of less anthropomorphic morphological characteristics, we present an exploratory study on the impacts of variations in concavity and edge roundness on human perception of robot arms. We systematically varied robot arm stimuli to span three levels of concavity and three levels of edge roundness, before conducting an online, survey-based, within-subject study (<i>N</i> = 157) to investigate the impact on perceptions of social characteristics, safety, and expected price. The results show that concavity significantly impacts discomfort and price sensitivity, with participant preferences split on whether \"thick\" or \"thin\" arms are preferable for in-home use. The results of this work can inform roboticists and designers looking to develop new systems or when choosing robot systems for in-home tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":524210,"journal":{"name":"Social robotics : 16th International Conference, ICSR + AI 2024, Odense, Denmark, October 23-26, 2024 : proceedings. International Conference on Social Robotics (16th : 2024 : Odense, Denmark)","volume":"15562 ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13581441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social robotics : 16th International Conference, ICSR + AI 2024, Odense, Denmark, October 23-26, 2024 : proceedings. International Conference on Social Robotics (16th : 2024 : Odense, Denmark)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-3519-1_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The appearance of a robot is generally understood to affect human perception of the robot, yet the majority of investigation into the impact of robot form has focused on humanoid robots and robot size. To better understand the impact of less anthropomorphic morphological characteristics, we present an exploratory study on the impacts of variations in concavity and edge roundness on human perception of robot arms. We systematically varied robot arm stimuli to span three levels of concavity and three levels of edge roundness, before conducting an online, survey-based, within-subject study (N = 157) to investigate the impact on perceptions of social characteristics, safety, and expected price. The results show that concavity significantly impacts discomfort and price sensitivity, with participant preferences split on whether "thick" or "thin" arms are preferable for in-home use. The results of this work can inform roboticists and designers looking to develop new systems or when choosing robot systems for in-home tasks.

机器人手臂应该变细还是变粗?研究形状特征对人类感知机器人手臂的影响。
机器人的外观通常会影响人类对机器人的感知,然而大多数关于机器人形状影响的研究都集中在人形机器人和机器人尺寸上。为了更好地理解不太拟人化的形态特征的影响,我们对机器人手臂的凹凸度和边缘圆度的变化对人类感知的影响进行了探索性研究。我们系统地改变了机器人手臂的刺激,使其跨越三个层次的凹凸度和三个层次的边缘圆度,然后进行了一项基于在线调查的主题内研究(N = 157),以调查对社会特征、安全性和预期价格感知的影响。结果表明,凹凸度显著影响不舒适感和价格敏感性,参与者对“厚”或“薄”手臂更适合家庭使用的偏好存在分歧。这项工作的结果可以为机器人专家和设计师开发新系统或为家庭任务选择机器人系统提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书