Stairstep Pericranial Incisions Are Associated With Reduced Wound Complications in Supratentorial Craniotomies for Malignant Brain Tumors: A Single-Institutional Comparative Cohort Analysis.
Nada Botros, Thomas Hosseini, Timothy F Boerger, Omar Hussain, Kate B Krucoff, Max O Krucoff
{"title":"Stairstep Pericranial Incisions Are Associated With Reduced Wound Complications in Supratentorial Craniotomies for Malignant Brain Tumors: A Single-Institutional Comparative Cohort Analysis.","authors":"Nada Botros, Thomas Hosseini, Timothy F Boerger, Omar Hussain, Kate B Krucoff, Max O Krucoff","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000002199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomies for malignant brain tumors often receive steroids, undergo radiation, experience hyperglycemia, and receive chemotherapy, all of which inhibit soft tissue healing. Poor wound healing can then lead to morbid sequelae (ie, bone flap infections) that derail clinical care by requiring subsequent operations, readmissions, and delayed initiation of cancer treatments. To minimize the clinical impact of inevitable poor wound healing in this population, we previously described a novel, multilayer incision with a stairstep through the pericranium to prevent progression of poor superficial wound healing to deeper infections. Here we compare wound-related outcomes from 200 consecutive cases using the stairstep incision technique with 200 similar consecutive cases performed with standard incisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared wound-related outcomes from 200 consecutive patients who underwent supratentorial craniotomies using the stairstep technique to a control group of 200 consecutive patients who underwent similar procedures using standard incisions at our institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, patients with stairstep pericranial incisions had fewer culture-positive infections (1.0% vs 5.0%; P = .04) and fewer readmissions for IV antibiotics (1.0% vs 6.5%; P = .01). While rates of early superficial wound concerns (ie, scabbing, focal dehiscence, or cellulitis) were similar between groups (6.0% pericranial vs 7.5% standard; P = .7), progression to morbid sequelae in the subgroup of people with superficial wound concerns was markedly lower after stairstep closure (0.0% vs 86.7%; P < .001). Specifically, rates of culture-positive infection (0.0% vs 66.7%; P < .001), IV antibiotics (0.0% vs 86.7%; P < .001), and reoperation (0.0% vs 60.0%; P < .01) were significantly lower in the group with early wound concerns who had stairstep pericranial incisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Here we provide evidence that stairstep pericranial incisions are associated with fewer wound complications in supratentorial brain surgery, potentially due to protection against superficial wound issues progressing to clinically morbid sequelae. Prospective, randomized studies will assess the causal impact of the technique on wound-related outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000002199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomies for malignant brain tumors often receive steroids, undergo radiation, experience hyperglycemia, and receive chemotherapy, all of which inhibit soft tissue healing. Poor wound healing can then lead to morbid sequelae (ie, bone flap infections) that derail clinical care by requiring subsequent operations, readmissions, and delayed initiation of cancer treatments. To minimize the clinical impact of inevitable poor wound healing in this population, we previously described a novel, multilayer incision with a stairstep through the pericranium to prevent progression of poor superficial wound healing to deeper infections. Here we compare wound-related outcomes from 200 consecutive cases using the stairstep incision technique with 200 similar consecutive cases performed with standard incisions.
Methods: We compared wound-related outcomes from 200 consecutive patients who underwent supratentorial craniotomies using the stairstep technique to a control group of 200 consecutive patients who underwent similar procedures using standard incisions at our institution.
Results: Overall, patients with stairstep pericranial incisions had fewer culture-positive infections (1.0% vs 5.0%; P = .04) and fewer readmissions for IV antibiotics (1.0% vs 6.5%; P = .01). While rates of early superficial wound concerns (ie, scabbing, focal dehiscence, or cellulitis) were similar between groups (6.0% pericranial vs 7.5% standard; P = .7), progression to morbid sequelae in the subgroup of people with superficial wound concerns was markedly lower after stairstep closure (0.0% vs 86.7%; P < .001). Specifically, rates of culture-positive infection (0.0% vs 66.7%; P < .001), IV antibiotics (0.0% vs 86.7%; P < .001), and reoperation (0.0% vs 60.0%; P < .01) were significantly lower in the group with early wound concerns who had stairstep pericranial incisions.
Conclusion: Here we provide evidence that stairstep pericranial incisions are associated with fewer wound complications in supratentorial brain surgery, potentially due to protection against superficial wound issues progressing to clinically morbid sequelae. Prospective, randomized studies will assess the causal impact of the technique on wound-related outcomes.
背景与目的:恶性脑肿瘤幕上开颅手术患者常接受类固醇、放疗、高血糖和化疗,这些都会抑制软组织愈合。伤口愈合不良可能导致病态的后遗症(如骨瓣感染),需要后续手术、再入院和延迟癌症治疗的开始,从而破坏临床护理。为了尽量减少这一人群中不可避免的伤口愈合不良的临床影响,我们之前描述了一种新颖的多层切口,通过皮包骨的阶梯,以防止表面伤口愈合不良发展为更深的感染。在这里,我们比较了连续200例使用阶梯切口技术和连续200例使用标准切口的类似病例的伤口相关结果。方法:我们比较了200例连续使用台阶技术进行幕上开颅手术的患者与对照组200例连续使用标准切口进行类似手术的患者的伤口相关结果。结果:总体而言,阶梯状颅周切口患者的培养阳性感染较少(1.0% vs 5.0%, P = 0.04),静脉注射抗生素再入院较少(1.0% vs 6.5%, P = 0.01)。虽然早期浅表伤口的发生率(即结痂、局灶性裂开或蜂窝织炎)在两组之间相似(颅周6.0% vs标准7.5%;P = 0.7),但在有浅表伤口的亚组中,台阶闭合后发展为病状后遗症的发生率明显较低(0.0% vs 86.7%; P < 0.001)。其中,培养阳性感染率(0.0% vs 66.7%, P < 0.001)、静脉注射抗生素(0.0% vs 86.7%, P < 0.001)和再手术(0.0% vs 60.0%, P < 0.01)在有早期创面顾虑的阶梯型颅周切口组显著降低。结论:我们提供的证据表明,在幕上脑外科手术中,台阶式颅周切口与较少的伤口并发症有关,这可能是由于防止浅表伤口问题发展为临床病理后遗症。前瞻性随机研究将评估该技术对伤口相关结果的因果影响。