Peroneus longus tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Current evidence, donor-site complications and patient selection.

IF 5
Ahmet Emin Okutan, Nicolaas Budhiparama, Mirco Herbort, Özkan Köse, Wolf Petersen, Guido Wierer, Tunay Erden, Elmar Herbst, Thomas Tischer, Michael T Hirschmann, Romain Seil, Ahmet Uğur Turhan, Mahmut Enes Kayaalp
{"title":"Peroneus longus tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Current evidence, donor-site complications and patient selection.","authors":"Ahmet Emin Okutan, Nicolaas Budhiparama, Mirco Herbort, Özkan Köse, Wolf Petersen, Guido Wierer, Tunay Erden, Elmar Herbst, Thomas Tischer, Michael T Hirschmann, Romain Seil, Ahmet Uğur Turhan, Mahmut Enes Kayaalp","doi":"10.1002/ksa.70616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The search for the ideal autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) remains a longstanding challenge in orthopaedic surgery, as each available graft possesses distinct advantages and inherent limitations. The peroneus longus tendon (PLT) has emerged as an alternative autograft, expanding graft options without further compromising the injured knee. Initially regarded with caution because of concerns regarding its role in foot and ankle biomechanics, the PLT has evolved into an increasingly recognised alternative autograft option supported by a growing body of anatomical, biomechanical and clinical evidence. The accumulating evidence suggests that the PLT provides reliable graft characteristics, while available comparative studies report broadly similar short- to mid-term clinical outcomes to established autografts and generally favourable donor-site function. However, the predominantly retrospective and heterogeneous evidence base does not establish graft equivalence or noninferiority. Although important questions remain, particularly regarding sport-specific ankle performance in high-demand athletes, long-term donor-site consequences and optimal harvest techniques, the available evidence supports consideration of the PLT as an additional autograft option for ACLR. Rather than establishing graft superiority, this editorial synthesises the current evidence, highlights the strengths and limitations of the PLT, and provides a practical framework for individualised ACL graft selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The search for the ideal autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) remains a longstanding challenge in orthopaedic surgery, as each available graft possesses distinct advantages and inherent limitations. The peroneus longus tendon (PLT) has emerged as an alternative autograft, expanding graft options without further compromising the injured knee. Initially regarded with caution because of concerns regarding its role in foot and ankle biomechanics, the PLT has evolved into an increasingly recognised alternative autograft option supported by a growing body of anatomical, biomechanical and clinical evidence. The accumulating evidence suggests that the PLT provides reliable graft characteristics, while available comparative studies report broadly similar short- to mid-term clinical outcomes to established autografts and generally favourable donor-site function. However, the predominantly retrospective and heterogeneous evidence base does not establish graft equivalence or noninferiority. Although important questions remain, particularly regarding sport-specific ankle performance in high-demand athletes, long-term donor-site consequences and optimal harvest techniques, the available evidence supports consideration of the PLT as an additional autograft option for ACLR. Rather than establishing graft superiority, this editorial synthesises the current evidence, highlights the strengths and limitations of the PLT, and provides a practical framework for individualised ACL graft selection.

自体腓骨长肌腱移植重建前交叉韧带:现有证据、供区并发症和患者选择。
寻找理想的自体前交叉韧带(ACL)重建(ACLR)移植物仍然是骨科手术中一个长期存在的挑战,因为每种可用的移植物都具有独特的优点和固有的局限性。腓骨长肌腱(PLT)已成为一种替代的自体移植物,扩大了移植物的选择,而不会进一步损害受伤的膝盖。由于担心其在足部和踝关节生物力学中的作用,PLT最初被认为是谨慎的,但在越来越多的解剖学、生物力学和临床证据的支持下,PLT已经发展成为一种越来越被认可的替代自体移植物选择。越来越多的证据表明,PLT提供了可靠的移植物特性,而现有的比较研究报告了与已建立的自体移植物大致相似的中短期临床结果和普遍有利的供区功能。然而,主要是回顾性和异质性的证据基础并没有建立移植等效性或非劣效性。尽管仍然存在一些重要的问题,特别是关于高要求运动员的运动特异性踝关节表现,长期供体部位后果和最佳收获技术,现有证据支持考虑PLT作为ACLR的额外自体移植物选择。这篇社论不是建立移植物的优势,而是综合了目前的证据,强调了PLT的优势和局限性,并为个性化的ACL移植物选择提供了一个实用的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书