{"title":"Dataset Readiness Assessment With Large Language Model (DRAFT–LLM): A Multi-Axis Audit Guided by LLM","authors":"Guillaume Guerard, Sonia Djebali","doi":"10.1002/cpz1.70463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article details the Dataset Readiness Assessment for Training (DRAFT), a systematic method for determining whether a high-dimensional biological dataset is suitable for developing reliable, equitable (i.e., the extent to which model performance, error patterns, and potential benefits or harms are evaluated and found to be acceptably distributed across relevant demographic, biological, clinical, and contextual subgroups), and scientifically meaningful machine-learning models, and DRAFT Large Language Model (DRAFT–LLM), its optional human-in-the-loop extension for calibrating study-specific audits through structured, critically reviewed LLM guidance. Standard model validation often fails to detect when apparent performance is driven by spurious correlations, technical artifacts, or hidden stratification, leading to irreproducible and inequitable findings. DRAFT–LLM addresses this gap by shifting the focus from model tuning to structured dataset auditing, organized around Support Protocols 1 to 4 that capture the scientific intent, data structure, and governance constraints of a given study. These Support Protocols: (1) elicit and formalize investigator input into a study intake and dataset card; (2) compute standardized dataset statistics and structural summaries suitable for downstream analysis and LLM context; (3) configure the language model using form-based responses, safety guardrails, and governance rules; and (4) generate personalized instructions, prompts, and code templates for running DRAFT audits. Basic Protocols 1 to 3 are instantiated from this support layer for generalization, equity, and stability: they are reusable execution patterns whose concrete behavior is determined by the cards, statistics, and configurations defined in the Support Protocols. DRAFT–LLM and DRAFT are demonstrated in this article through an end-to-end case study on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). © 2026 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</p><p><b>Support Protocol 1</b>: Study intake and dataset card construction</p><p><b>Support Protocol 2</b>: Dataset structure and advanced summary statistics for LLM context</p><p><b>Support Protocol 3</b>: LLM configuration using structured form responses</p><p><b>Support Protocol 4</b>: Generation of personalized instructions for DRAFT audits</p><p><b>Basic Protocol 1</b>: Generalization audit</p><p><b>Basic Protocol 2</b>: Equity audit</p><p><b>Basic Protocol 3</b>: Stability audit</p>","PeriodicalId":93970,"journal":{"name":"Current protocols","volume":"6 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpz1.70463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article details the Dataset Readiness Assessment for Training (DRAFT), a systematic method for determining whether a high-dimensional biological dataset is suitable for developing reliable, equitable (i.e., the extent to which model performance, error patterns, and potential benefits or harms are evaluated and found to be acceptably distributed across relevant demographic, biological, clinical, and contextual subgroups), and scientifically meaningful machine-learning models, and DRAFT Large Language Model (DRAFT–LLM), its optional human-in-the-loop extension for calibrating study-specific audits through structured, critically reviewed LLM guidance. Standard model validation often fails to detect when apparent performance is driven by spurious correlations, technical artifacts, or hidden stratification, leading to irreproducible and inequitable findings. DRAFT–LLM addresses this gap by shifting the focus from model tuning to structured dataset auditing, organized around Support Protocols 1 to 4 that capture the scientific intent, data structure, and governance constraints of a given study. These Support Protocols: (1) elicit and formalize investigator input into a study intake and dataset card; (2) compute standardized dataset statistics and structural summaries suitable for downstream analysis and LLM context; (3) configure the language model using form-based responses, safety guardrails, and governance rules; and (4) generate personalized instructions, prompts, and code templates for running DRAFT audits. Basic Protocols 1 to 3 are instantiated from this support layer for generalization, equity, and stability: they are reusable execution patterns whose concrete behavior is determined by the cards, statistics, and configurations defined in the Support Protocols. DRAFT–LLM and DRAFT are demonstrated in this article through an end-to-end case study on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). © 2026 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Support Protocol 1: Study intake and dataset card construction
Support Protocol 2: Dataset structure and advanced summary statistics for LLM context
Support Protocol 3: LLM configuration using structured form responses
Support Protocol 4: Generation of personalized instructions for DRAFT audits
Basic Protocol 1: Generalization audit
Basic Protocol 2: Equity audit
Basic Protocol 3: Stability audit
使用大型语言模型的数据集准备性评估(草案-LLM):由LLM指导的多轴审计。
本文详细介绍了训练数据集准备评估(DRAFT),这是一种系统的方法,用于确定高维生物数据集是否适合开发可靠、公平(即,评估模型性能、错误模式和潜在利益或危害的程度,并发现在相关的人口统计学、生物学、临床和上下文亚组中可接受地分布)和科学上有意义的机器学习模型。和DRAFT Large Language Model (DRAFT-LLM),其可选的human-in- loop扩展,用于通过结构化的、经过严格审查的LLM指导来校准特定研究的审计。标准模型验证通常无法检测到明显的性能是由虚假的相关性、技术工件或隐藏的分层驱动的,从而导致不可复制和不公平的结果。DRAFT-LLM通过将重点从模型调优转移到结构化数据集审计来解决这一差距,围绕支持协议1到4进行组织,以捕获给定研究的科学意图、数据结构和治理约束。这些支持协议:(1)引导并形式化研究者输入研究输入和数据集卡;(2)计算适合下游分析和LLM上下文的标准化数据集统计和结构摘要;(3)使用基于表单的响应、安全护栏和治理规则配置语言模型;(4)为运行DRAFT审计生成个性化的指令、提示和代码模板。为了泛化、公平和稳定,基本协议1到3从这个支持层实例化:它们是可重用的执行模式,其具体行为由支持协议中定义的卡片、统计和配置决定。DRAFT- llm和DRAFT在本文中通过对癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)的端到端案例研究进行了演示。©2026 Wiley期刊有限责任公司支持协议1:研究导入和数据集卡构建支持协议2:LLM上下文的数据集结构和高级汇总统计支持协议3:使用结构化表单响应的LLM配置支持协议4:为DRAFT审计生成个性化指令基本协议1:概化审计基本协议2:股权审计基本协议3:稳定性审计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。