Utilization of a HIPAA-compliant large language model chatbot in an academic pediatric medical center.

IF 7.7
PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2026-09-17 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001684
Benjamin Rader, Dinesh K Rai, Melissa L Stewart, Sarah Lejfer, Sampath Chennuri, James Hartwell, Victor Moyano, Max H Witwer, Peter C Laussen, Heather L Nelson, John S Brownstein
{"title":"Utilization of a HIPAA-compliant large language model chatbot in an academic pediatric medical center.","authors":"Benjamin Rader, Dinesh K Rai, Melissa L Stewart, Sarah Lejfer, Sampath Chennuri, James Hartwell, Victor Moyano, Max H Witwer, Peter C Laussen, Heather L Nelson, John S Brownstein","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0001684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite growing interest in LLM chatbots, little evidence exists on usage patterns in hospital systems. This paper presents a mixed-methods case study of \"InternalGPT,\" a HIPAA-compliant LLM chatbot made available to employees of the institution. Survey responses and 14 months of system utilization data were analyzed across diverse professional roles in the institution. Of approximately 15,800 hospital employees, 2,149 (13.6%) requested InternalGPT access. Motivations for sign-up aligned with professional roles: operations professionals prioritized administrative automation, clinicians focused on clinical augmentation, and scientists on research and coding. Among InternalGPT users, 52.8% recorded at least one token use; 33.6% never logged-in, and 13.7% logged-in but never used the tool. The top 20% of users consumed 69.4% of tokens. Key barriers to engagement among non-users included limited time for exploration (51.4%) and difficulty using (21.8%), integrating (15.5%), or accessing (9.2%) InternalGPT. Among a small group of employees with sustained InternalGPT use (n = 461), a subset who responded to a self-report survey (n = 92) indicated a mean productivity gain of 30%, corresponding to an exploratory perceived productivity value of $6.3M to $18.9M under varying extrapolation assumptions. Although most hospital employees never used the HIPAA-compliant LLM chatbot, a small minority who utilized it regularly reported substantial productivity improvements, highlighting both the value proposition of LLMs in healthcare and potential for increased engagement. Implementation and knowledge challenges were more frequently cited than AI-feature and performance concerns as key barriers to adoption. These findings underscore that successful LLM implementation in healthcare hinges not only on advanced AI technology, but also on robust system capacity building including investments in user education and technical integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"5 9","pages":"e0001684"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13585266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite growing interest in LLM chatbots, little evidence exists on usage patterns in hospital systems. This paper presents a mixed-methods case study of "InternalGPT," a HIPAA-compliant LLM chatbot made available to employees of the institution. Survey responses and 14 months of system utilization data were analyzed across diverse professional roles in the institution. Of approximately 15,800 hospital employees, 2,149 (13.6%) requested InternalGPT access. Motivations for sign-up aligned with professional roles: operations professionals prioritized administrative automation, clinicians focused on clinical augmentation, and scientists on research and coding. Among InternalGPT users, 52.8% recorded at least one token use; 33.6% never logged-in, and 13.7% logged-in but never used the tool. The top 20% of users consumed 69.4% of tokens. Key barriers to engagement among non-users included limited time for exploration (51.4%) and difficulty using (21.8%), integrating (15.5%), or accessing (9.2%) InternalGPT. Among a small group of employees with sustained InternalGPT use (n = 461), a subset who responded to a self-report survey (n = 92) indicated a mean productivity gain of 30%, corresponding to an exploratory perceived productivity value of $6.3M to $18.9M under varying extrapolation assumptions. Although most hospital employees never used the HIPAA-compliant LLM chatbot, a small minority who utilized it regularly reported substantial productivity improvements, highlighting both the value proposition of LLMs in healthcare and potential for increased engagement. Implementation and knowledge challenges were more frequently cited than AI-feature and performance concerns as key barriers to adoption. These findings underscore that successful LLM implementation in healthcare hinges not only on advanced AI technology, but also on robust system capacity building including investments in user education and technical integration.

一个符合hipaa的大型语言模型聊天机器人在学术儿科医疗中心的应用。
尽管人们对法学硕士聊天机器人的兴趣越来越大,但很少有证据表明医院系统的使用模式。本文介绍了“InternalGPT”的混合方法案例研究,“InternalGPT”是一个符合hipaa的LLM聊天机器人,可供该机构的员工使用。调查结果和14个月的系统使用数据被分析在不同的专业角色的机构。在大约15,800名医院员工中,有2,149人(13.6%)要求访问InternalGPT。注册的动机与专业角色一致:操作专业人员优先考虑管理自动化,临床医生专注于临床扩展,科学家专注于研究和编码。在InternalGPT用户中,52.8%的用户至少使用过一次代币;33.6%的人从未登录过,13.7%的人登录过但从未使用过工具。前20%的用户消费了69.4%的代币。非用户参与的主要障碍包括探索时间有限(51.4%)、难以使用(21.8%)、整合(15.5%)或访问(9.2%)InternalGPT。在持续使用InternalGPT的一小群员工(n = 461)中,有一部分人回应了一项自我报告调查(n = 92),他们表示平均生产率提高了30%,在不同的外推假设下,相应的探索性感知生产率价值为630万美元至1890万美元。尽管大多数医院员工从未使用过符合hipaa的LLM聊天机器人,但少数定期使用它的员工报告说,他们的工作效率得到了显著提高,这突显了LLM在医疗保健领域的价值主张和提高参与度的潜力。与人工智能功能和性能问题相比,实施和知识方面的挑战更常被认为是采用人工智能的主要障碍。这些发现强调,在医疗保健领域成功实施法学硕士不仅取决于先进的人工智能技术,还取决于强大的系统能力建设,包括对用户教育和技术集成的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书