Barriers to good consultations in public primary healthcare clinics.

IF 1.7
Vincent Setlhare, Sphiwe Madiba
{"title":"Barriers to good consultations in public primary healthcare clinics.","authors":"Vincent Setlhare, Sphiwe Madiba","doi":"10.1017/S1463423626101789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study aim: </strong>To explore the barriers to good consultations in government primary health care (PHC) clinics, in Botswana.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Good consultations improve adherence to treatment, treatment outcomes, and health seeking behaviour while bad consultations do the opposite. We explored the barriers to good consultations (doctor patient interactions) in public PHC clinics in Botswana. Knowledge of these barriers may help in crafting strategies to eliminate the barriers and improve health care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a descriptive qualitative study in which patients and doctors were interviewed. A semi structured interview guide was used to collect data, until data saturation. Public PHC clinics and participants were purposively selected to ensure variety in both. The data was analysed for themes, manually and using NVivo software.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Barriers included patients' and doctors' negative behaviours and attitudes, inadequate time to conduct consultations, not having time to do physical examination of patients, and high patient volumes. Other barriers were drug and equipment shortages, lack of privacy, and communication barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Barriers to good consultations included health system level, doctor level, and patient level barriers. Thus, corrective interventions will need to target patient, doctor, and health system factors. These interventions should target improving doctors' and patients' behaviours and attitudes during consultations. Health system interventions should be directed at medicine and equipment shortages, as well alleviating the problem of high patient loads per doctor. Addressing communication barriers between patients and doctors should be part of the interventions to improve consultations and healthcare in public PHC clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"27 ","pages":"e103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423626101789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study aim: To explore the barriers to good consultations in government primary health care (PHC) clinics, in Botswana.

Background: Good consultations improve adherence to treatment, treatment outcomes, and health seeking behaviour while bad consultations do the opposite. We explored the barriers to good consultations (doctor patient interactions) in public PHC clinics in Botswana. Knowledge of these barriers may help in crafting strategies to eliminate the barriers and improve health care.

Methods: This was a descriptive qualitative study in which patients and doctors were interviewed. A semi structured interview guide was used to collect data, until data saturation. Public PHC clinics and participants were purposively selected to ensure variety in both. The data was analysed for themes, manually and using NVivo software.

Findings: Barriers included patients' and doctors' negative behaviours and attitudes, inadequate time to conduct consultations, not having time to do physical examination of patients, and high patient volumes. Other barriers were drug and equipment shortages, lack of privacy, and communication barriers.

Conclusion: Barriers to good consultations included health system level, doctor level, and patient level barriers. Thus, corrective interventions will need to target patient, doctor, and health system factors. These interventions should target improving doctors' and patients' behaviours and attitudes during consultations. Health system interventions should be directed at medicine and equipment shortages, as well alleviating the problem of high patient loads per doctor. Addressing communication barriers between patients and doctors should be part of the interventions to improve consultations and healthcare in public PHC clinics.

在公共初级保健诊所进行良好咨询的障碍。
研究目的:探讨博茨瓦纳政府初级卫生保健(PHC)诊所进行良好咨询的障碍。背景:良好的咨询可以改善治疗依从性、治疗结果和寻求健康的行为,而糟糕的咨询则相反。我们探索了博茨瓦纳公共初级保健诊所进行良好咨询(医患互动)的障碍。了解这些障碍可能有助于制定消除障碍和改善保健的战略。方法:采用描述性定性研究,对患者和医生进行访谈。采用半结构化访谈指南收集数据,直至数据饱和。公立初级保健诊所和参与者的选择是有目的的,以确保两者的多样性。数据分析的主题,手动和使用NVivo软件。研究发现:障碍包括患者和医生的消极行为和态度,没有足够的时间进行咨询,没有时间对患者进行身体检查,以及患者数量大。其他障碍包括药品和设备短缺、缺乏隐私和沟通障碍。结论:良好会诊的障碍包括卫生系统层面、医生层面和患者层面的障碍。因此,纠正性干预措施需要针对患者、医生和卫生系统因素。这些干预措施的目标应该是改善医生和患者在咨询期间的行为和态度。卫生系统的干预措施应针对药品和设备短缺,以及减轻每名医生的高病人负荷问题。解决病人和医生之间的沟通障碍应该是改善公共初级保健诊所咨询和保健的干预措施的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书