[Surgical access routes and their selection for osteosynthesis of pilon fractures].

Philipp Stillhard, Christian Michelitsch, Primoz Potocnik, Christoph Sommer
{"title":"[Surgical access routes and their selection for osteosynthesis of pilon fractures].","authors":"Philipp Stillhard, Christian Michelitsch, Primoz Potocnik, Christoph Sommer","doi":"10.1007/s00113-026-01763-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The operative management of pilon fractures requires individually tailored preoperative planning, taking the fracture morphology, the intended reconstruction strategy and the local soft tissue situation into account. The goal is the anatomical restoration of the articular surface by means of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), combined with soft tissue-preserving stabilization of the metadiaphyseal component using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO). The choice of surgical approach is based on the analysis of computed tomography (CT) imaging, particularly the location of the main articular fracture fragments and the planned implant positioning. The anterior fracture extension represents an important landmark for selecting the primary approach. Valgus and varus deformities influence the required direction of buttress support and, consequently, the final plate position. Articular reconstruction is preferably performed using an open-the-window technique with longitudinal arthrotomy and opening of the fracture along the main epimetaphyseal fracture line, enabling direct visualization of the articular surface and the talar dome. The different surgical approaches complement each other depending on the individual fracture configuration. Successful treatment of pilon fractures therefore relies on precise preoperative planning, anatomical reconstruction of the articular surface and consistent preservation of the soft tissues.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-026-01763-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The operative management of pilon fractures requires individually tailored preoperative planning, taking the fracture morphology, the intended reconstruction strategy and the local soft tissue situation into account. The goal is the anatomical restoration of the articular surface by means of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), combined with soft tissue-preserving stabilization of the metadiaphyseal component using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO). The choice of surgical approach is based on the analysis of computed tomography (CT) imaging, particularly the location of the main articular fracture fragments and the planned implant positioning. The anterior fracture extension represents an important landmark for selecting the primary approach. Valgus and varus deformities influence the required direction of buttress support and, consequently, the final plate position. Articular reconstruction is preferably performed using an open-the-window technique with longitudinal arthrotomy and opening of the fracture along the main epimetaphyseal fracture line, enabling direct visualization of the articular surface and the talar dome. The different surgical approaches complement each other depending on the individual fracture configuration. Successful treatment of pilon fractures therefore relies on precise preoperative planning, anatomical reconstruction of the articular surface and consistent preservation of the soft tissues.

[头枕骨折的手术通路及其选择]。
枕部骨折的手术治疗需要个体化的术前计划,考虑骨折形态、预期的重建策略和局部软组织情况。目的是通过切开复位和内固定(ORIF)的方法对关节面进行解剖恢复,同时使用微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)对骨干后段保持软组织稳定。手术入路的选择是基于计算机断层扫描(CT)成像分析,特别是主要关节骨折碎片的位置和计划的植入物定位。骨折前伸是选择主要入路的重要标志。外翻和内翻畸形会影响所需的支撑方向,从而影响钢板的最终位置。关节重建最好采用开窗技术,纵向关节切开术,沿主要干骺端骨折线切开骨折,可以直接观察关节面和距骨穹窿。不同的手术入路根据不同的骨折形态相互补充。因此,成功治疗枕部骨折依赖于精确的术前计划、关节面解剖重建和软组织的持续保存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书