Heritability of Productive, Reproductive and Carcass Traits in Pure-Bred and Cross-Bred Pigs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Wilber Hernández-Montiel, Amada I Osorio-Terán, Víctor M Meza-Villalvazo, Adolfo Amador-Mendoza, José Abad-Zavaleta, Nicolás Valenzuela-Jiménez, Mario Alberto Martínez-Núñez
{"title":"Heritability of Productive, Reproductive and Carcass Traits in Pure-Bred and Cross-Bred Pigs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Wilber Hernández-Montiel, Amada I Osorio-Terán, Víctor M Meza-Villalvazo, Adolfo Amador-Mendoza, José Abad-Zavaleta, Nicolás Valenzuela-Jiménez, Mario Alberto Martínez-Núñez","doi":"10.1111/jbg.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heritability (h<sup>2</sup>) is a key parameter in animal breeding, but its magnitude and consistency across pure-bred (PB) and cross-bred (CB) pig populations remain poorly understood. This study aimed to compare heritability estimates between PB and CB populations for economically relevant traits through a systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of 28 studies (75 independent h<sup>2</sup> estimates) were identified through searches in PubMed, Mendeley, Springer, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar (2000-2024). Multilevel random-effects models with logit transformation were applied. Traits were grouped into reproductive, growth, conformation and carcass categories. Reproductive traits showed low heritability (e.g., litter size: 0.06 in PB and 0.20 in CB; number born alive [NBA]: 0.07 in CB), whereas growth and carcass traits exhibited moderate values (e.g., average daily gain: 0.21 in PB and 0.31 in CB; intramuscular fat: 0.31 in PB and 0.29 in CB; pH: 0.23-0.26). Meta-regression did not detect a significant effect of population type (β = 0.124, p = 0.630), whereas studies accounting for non-additive genetic effects showed significantly different heritability estimates (QM = 4.35, p = 0.037), and high heterogeneity was observed across traits (I<sup>2</sup> > 90%). These results indicate that cross-breeding does not systematically increase additive heritability. Instead, differences depend on trait type, likely reflecting differences in genetic architecture and the relative contribution of additive and non-additive genetic effects. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of population-specific genetic evaluations and context-dependent breeding strategies in pig production, supporting the complementary interpretation of heritability and pure-bred-cross-bred genetic correlation (rPC) within Combined Cross-bred and Pure-bred Selection (CCPS) programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.70077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heritability (h2) is a key parameter in animal breeding, but its magnitude and consistency across pure-bred (PB) and cross-bred (CB) pig populations remain poorly understood. This study aimed to compare heritability estimates between PB and CB populations for economically relevant traits through a systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of 28 studies (75 independent h2 estimates) were identified through searches in PubMed, Mendeley, Springer, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar (2000-2024). Multilevel random-effects models with logit transformation were applied. Traits were grouped into reproductive, growth, conformation and carcass categories. Reproductive traits showed low heritability (e.g., litter size: 0.06 in PB and 0.20 in CB; number born alive [NBA]: 0.07 in CB), whereas growth and carcass traits exhibited moderate values (e.g., average daily gain: 0.21 in PB and 0.31 in CB; intramuscular fat: 0.31 in PB and 0.29 in CB; pH: 0.23-0.26). Meta-regression did not detect a significant effect of population type (β = 0.124, p = 0.630), whereas studies accounting for non-additive genetic effects showed significantly different heritability estimates (QM = 4.35, p = 0.037), and high heterogeneity was observed across traits (I2 > 90%). These results indicate that cross-breeding does not systematically increase additive heritability. Instead, differences depend on trait type, likely reflecting differences in genetic architecture and the relative contribution of additive and non-additive genetic effects. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of population-specific genetic evaluations and context-dependent breeding strategies in pig production, supporting the complementary interpretation of heritability and pure-bred-cross-bred genetic correlation (rPC) within Combined Cross-bred and Pure-bred Selection (CCPS) programmes.

纯种和杂交猪生产、繁殖和胴体性状的遗传力:系统综述和荟萃分析。
遗传力(h2)是动物育种中的一个关键参数,但其在纯种猪(PB)和杂交猪(CB)群体中的大小和一致性仍然知之甚少。本研究旨在通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,比较PB和CB群体在经济相关性状上的遗传力估计。通过PubMed, Mendeley, b施普林格,ScienceDirect和谷歌Scholar(2000-2024)的检索,共确定了28项研究(75项独立的h2估计)。采用logit变换的多层随机效应模型。性状分为繁殖类、生长类、构象类和胴体类。繁殖性状的遗传力较低(产仔数:PB为0.06,CB为0.20;出生活仔数[NBA]: CB为0.07),而生长和胴体性状的遗传力中等(平均日增重:PB为0.21,CB为0.31;肌内脂肪:PB为0.31,CB为0.29;pH为0.23-0.26)。meta回归未发现群体类型的显著影响(β = 0.124, p = 0.630),而考虑非加性遗传效应的研究显示了显著不同的遗传力估计(QM = 4.35, p = 0.037),并且在性状之间观察到高异质性(I2 bb0 90%)。这些结果表明,杂交育种不能系统地提高加性遗传力。相反,差异取决于性状类型,可能反映了遗传结构的差异以及加性和非加性遗传效应的相对贡献。总的来说,这些发现强调了群体特异性遗传评估和环境依赖育种策略在生猪生产中的重要性,支持了在杂交和纯种选择(CCPS)计划中对遗传力和纯种-杂交遗传相关(rPC)的互补解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics publishes original articles by international scientists on genomic selection, and any other topic related to breeding programmes, selection, quantitative genetic, genomics, diversity and evolution of domestic animals. Researchers, teachers, and the animal breeding industry will find the reports of interest. Book reviews appear in many issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书