Investigating the Comprehensibility Paradigm: Key Fluency Predictors in L1 English Speakers' Evaluations of Japanese Speakers' L2 English.

IF 1.1 2区 文学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Dion Clingwall, Gavin Brooks, Jon Clenton
{"title":"Investigating the Comprehensibility Paradigm: Key Fluency Predictors in L1 English Speakers' Evaluations of Japanese Speakers' L2 English.","authors":"Dion Clingwall, Gavin Brooks, Jon Clenton","doi":"10.1177/00238309261477379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study investigates the relationship between first language (L1) and second language (L2) oral fluency and their association with comprehensibility in lower-intermediate Japanese learners of English, examining which L2 fluency features are most closely associated with L1 English listeners' comprehensibility ratings after accounting for individual differences in L1 fluency. Thirty participants completed parallel speaking tasks in their L1 (Japanese) and L2 (English), and speech samples were analysed for eight established utterance fluency measures encompassing speed, breakdown, and repair fluency. Inexperienced L1 English listeners rated comprehensibility, the perceived ease or difficulty of understanding a speech sample, on a 1,000-point continuous scale. Bootstrapped Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression and dominance analysis identified filled pause ratio, silent pauses within clauses, and articulation rate as the strongest L2 predictors of comprehensibility, together explaining nearly half the variance in listener ratings. Correlational analyses revealed moderate cross-linguistic links for pausing (<i>r</i> = .46-.51) and repair behaviours (<i>r</i> = .63-.80), suggesting that certain fluency traits, particularly repair behaviours, show cross-linguistic consistency. However, when both L1 and L2 fluency measures were included in regression models, only L2 features remained significant predictors, suggesting that listener judgements are shaped primarily by L2-specific speech behaviours rather than L1 speaking styles. These findings clarify the relationship between language-general and language-specific fluency traits, indicating that comprehensibility is most strongly linked to how fluently learners speak in the L2 itself, and illustrate the value of regularised regression techniques for identifying core fluency predictors in small-sample research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51255,"journal":{"name":"Language and Speech","volume":" ","pages":"238309261477379"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Speech","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309261477379","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigates the relationship between first language (L1) and second language (L2) oral fluency and their association with comprehensibility in lower-intermediate Japanese learners of English, examining which L2 fluency features are most closely associated with L1 English listeners' comprehensibility ratings after accounting for individual differences in L1 fluency. Thirty participants completed parallel speaking tasks in their L1 (Japanese) and L2 (English), and speech samples were analysed for eight established utterance fluency measures encompassing speed, breakdown, and repair fluency. Inexperienced L1 English listeners rated comprehensibility, the perceived ease or difficulty of understanding a speech sample, on a 1,000-point continuous scale. Bootstrapped Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression and dominance analysis identified filled pause ratio, silent pauses within clauses, and articulation rate as the strongest L2 predictors of comprehensibility, together explaining nearly half the variance in listener ratings. Correlational analyses revealed moderate cross-linguistic links for pausing (r = .46-.51) and repair behaviours (r = .63-.80), suggesting that certain fluency traits, particularly repair behaviours, show cross-linguistic consistency. However, when both L1 and L2 fluency measures were included in regression models, only L2 features remained significant predictors, suggesting that listener judgements are shaped primarily by L2-specific speech behaviours rather than L1 speaking styles. These findings clarify the relationship between language-general and language-specific fluency traits, indicating that comprehensibility is most strongly linked to how fluently learners speak in the L2 itself, and illustrate the value of regularised regression techniques for identifying core fluency predictors in small-sample research.

可理解性范式的研究:母语英语使用者评价日语使用者第二语言英语的关键流畅性预测因子。
本研究调查了中级日本英语学习者的第一语言(L1)和第二语言(L2)口语流利度之间的关系及其与可理解性的关系,在考虑了L1流利度的个体差异后,研究了哪些L2流利度特征与L1英语听者的可理解性评级关系最密切。30名参与者完成了母语(日语)和第二语言(英语)的平行说话任务,并对语音样本进行了八种既定的流利度测量,包括速度、中断和修复流利度。没有经验的母语英语听众给可理解性打分,即理解语音样本的容易程度或困难程度,满分为1000分。bootstrap最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归和优势分析发现,填充停顿率、句子中的沉默停顿和发音率是二语可理解性的最强预测因子,它们共同解释了听众评分中近一半的差异。相关分析显示,停顿(r = 0.46 - 0.51)和修复行为(r = 0.63 - 0.80)之间存在中等程度的跨语言联系,这表明某些流利性特征,尤其是修复行为,表现出跨语言一致性。然而,当将母语和二语流利度测量纳入回归模型时,只有二语特征仍然是显著的预测因子,这表明听者的判断主要是由母语特定的言语行为而不是母语说话风格决定的。这些发现阐明了通用语言和特定语言流畅性特征之间的关系,表明可理解性与学习者在第二语言中说话的流畅程度密切相关,并说明了正则化回归技术在小样本研究中识别核心流畅性预测因子的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language and Speech
Language and Speech AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Language and Speech is a peer-reviewed journal which provides an international forum for communication among researchers in the disciplines that contribute to our understanding of the production, perception, processing, learning, use, and disorders of speech and language. The journal accepts reports of original research in all these areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书