Digital health technologies in frontotemporal dementia: A scoping review.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-09-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076261483445
Liset de Boer, Olaiya A Aro, Harro Seelaar, Lize C Jiskoot, Jackie M Poos
{"title":"Digital health technologies in frontotemporal dementia: A scoping review.","authors":"Liset de Boer, Olaiya A Aro, Harro Seelaar, Lize C Jiskoot, Jackie M Poos","doi":"10.1177/20552076261483445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Digital health technologies are increasingly used to assess cognition and behavior in neurodegenerative diseases. While such tools have shown promise in Alzheimer's disease, including the preclinical stages, their use in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) remains underexplored. This scoping review provides an overview of the current literature on digital health technologies in FTD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search according to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included 62 studies investigating digital health technologies in individuals with FTD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The identified technologies included eye tracking paradigms, smartphone- and tablet-based cognitive assessments, and passive monitoring approaches such as wearable sensors and mobile applications. Most studies reported that these technologies could distinguish individuals with FTD from healthy controls or other dementia syndromes. However, many studies were experimental or feasibility-focused, and systematic evaluation of psychometric properties remains limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In order to move the field forward, we argue that an in-depth investigation of the relationships between digital health technologies, classical pen-and-paper assessments of cognitive and behavioral functioning, and other biomarkers is necessary to establish clinical validity. Other important aspects to address in future research include the use of diverse cohorts and studying longitudinal effects. In our view, these next steps are crucial to advance digital health technologies toward implementation in clinical practice and clinical trials for FTD.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"12 ","pages":"20552076261483445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13583275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076261483445","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Digital health technologies are increasingly used to assess cognition and behavior in neurodegenerative diseases. While such tools have shown promise in Alzheimer's disease, including the preclinical stages, their use in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) remains underexplored. This scoping review provides an overview of the current literature on digital health technologies in FTD.

Methods: We conducted a literature search according to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included 62 studies investigating digital health technologies in individuals with FTD.

Results: The identified technologies included eye tracking paradigms, smartphone- and tablet-based cognitive assessments, and passive monitoring approaches such as wearable sensors and mobile applications. Most studies reported that these technologies could distinguish individuals with FTD from healthy controls or other dementia syndromes. However, many studies were experimental or feasibility-focused, and systematic evaluation of psychometric properties remains limited.

Conclusion: In order to move the field forward, we argue that an in-depth investigation of the relationships between digital health technologies, classical pen-and-paper assessments of cognitive and behavioral functioning, and other biomarkers is necessary to establish clinical validity. Other important aspects to address in future research include the use of diverse cohorts and studying longitudinal effects. In our view, these next steps are crucial to advance digital health technologies toward implementation in clinical practice and clinical trials for FTD.

额颞叶痴呆的数字健康技术:范围综述。
目的:数字健康技术越来越多地用于评估神经退行性疾病的认知和行为。虽然这些工具在阿尔茨海默病(包括临床前阶段)中显示出了希望,但它们在额颞叶痴呆(FTD)中的应用仍未得到充分探索。这一范围审查概述了目前关于FTD中数字卫生技术的文献。方法:我们根据PRISMA-ScR指南进行了文献检索,纳入了62项调查FTD患者数字健康技术的研究。结果:确定的技术包括眼动追踪范式,基于智能手机和平板电脑的认知评估,以及被动监测方法,如可穿戴传感器和移动应用程序。大多数研究报告称,这些技术可以将FTD患者与健康对照者或其他痴呆综合征区分开来。然而,许多研究都是实验性的或以可行性为中心的,对心理测量特性的系统评估仍然有限。结论:为了推动这一领域的发展,我们认为有必要深入研究数字健康技术、传统的认知和行为功能的纸笔评估以及其他生物标志物之间的关系,以建立临床有效性。在未来的研究中需要解决的其他重要方面包括使用不同的队列和研究纵向效应。我们认为,接下来的这些步骤对于推动数字卫生技术在FTD临床实践和临床试验中的应用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书