Naomi de Leng, Margot Joosen, Dorien Kooij, Marjan Bakker, Anneloes van den Broek, Arno van Dam, Ilja Bongers, Koen Grootens, Laurian Hafkemeijer, Evelien Brouwers
{"title":"Mental Healthcare Professionals' Own Mental Health Disclosure to their Supervisor: Investigating Barriers and Facilitators, Experiences, and Needs.","authors":"Naomi de Leng, Margot Joosen, Dorien Kooij, Marjan Bakker, Anneloes van den Broek, Arno van Dam, Ilja Bongers, Koen Grootens, Laurian Hafkemeijer, Evelien Brouwers","doi":"10.1007/s10926-026-10451-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For mental healthcare professionals (MHPs) with mental health issues and illness (MHI), disclosure to a supervisor at work can be a dilemma: it may facilitate support but also involves risks of stigma and discrimination. This study examined barriers and facilitators, experiences, and needs regarding disclosure of MHI to supervisors among MHPs, and compared disclosers and non-disclosers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online questionnaire was completed by 298 MHPs with MHI working in five Dutch community mental healthcare centers. Descriptive analyses summarized disclosure decisions, barriers and facilitators, experiences, and needs. Differences between disclosers and non-disclosers were examined using chi-square tests with Monte Carlo significance testing and one-way ANOVAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-thirds of participants disclosed their MHI to their supervisor. There were no differences in demographics, work position, or perceived experience (positive/negative) between disclosers and non-disclosers. Both disclosers and non-disclosers reported fears of stigmatization and discrimination, a preference for self-reliance, and difficulties discussing MHI. 70% of disclosers reported that they had no other choice but to disclose. Most disclosers also reported that their MHI affected occupational functioning, they needed workplace accommodations and that their supervisor took MHI seriously. The most frequently reported need for future disclosure was a supervisor with an understanding for MHI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The decision to (non-)disclose was strongly shaped by fears of stigma, discrimination, preferences for self-reliance, but also the perceived necessity to disclose. Supervisors play a key role in creating an environment where MHPs feel safe to disclose, which can contribute to MHPs' sustainable employability and well-being at work.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-026-10451-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: For mental healthcare professionals (MHPs) with mental health issues and illness (MHI), disclosure to a supervisor at work can be a dilemma: it may facilitate support but also involves risks of stigma and discrimination. This study examined barriers and facilitators, experiences, and needs regarding disclosure of MHI to supervisors among MHPs, and compared disclosers and non-disclosers.
Methods: A cross-sectional online questionnaire was completed by 298 MHPs with MHI working in five Dutch community mental healthcare centers. Descriptive analyses summarized disclosure decisions, barriers and facilitators, experiences, and needs. Differences between disclosers and non-disclosers were examined using chi-square tests with Monte Carlo significance testing and one-way ANOVAs.
Results: Two-thirds of participants disclosed their MHI to their supervisor. There were no differences in demographics, work position, or perceived experience (positive/negative) between disclosers and non-disclosers. Both disclosers and non-disclosers reported fears of stigmatization and discrimination, a preference for self-reliance, and difficulties discussing MHI. 70% of disclosers reported that they had no other choice but to disclose. Most disclosers also reported that their MHI affected occupational functioning, they needed workplace accommodations and that their supervisor took MHI seriously. The most frequently reported need for future disclosure was a supervisor with an understanding for MHI.
Conclusion: The decision to (non-)disclose was strongly shaped by fears of stigma, discrimination, preferences for self-reliance, but also the perceived necessity to disclose. Supervisors play a key role in creating an environment where MHPs feel safe to disclose, which can contribute to MHPs' sustainable employability and well-being at work.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law. A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.