Mental Healthcare Professionals' Own Mental Health Disclosure to their Supervisor: Investigating Barriers and Facilitators, Experiences, and Needs.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Naomi de Leng, Margot Joosen, Dorien Kooij, Marjan Bakker, Anneloes van den Broek, Arno van Dam, Ilja Bongers, Koen Grootens, Laurian Hafkemeijer, Evelien Brouwers
{"title":"Mental Healthcare Professionals' Own Mental Health Disclosure to their Supervisor: Investigating Barriers and Facilitators, Experiences, and Needs.","authors":"Naomi de Leng, Margot Joosen, Dorien Kooij, Marjan Bakker, Anneloes van den Broek, Arno van Dam, Ilja Bongers, Koen Grootens, Laurian Hafkemeijer, Evelien Brouwers","doi":"10.1007/s10926-026-10451-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For mental healthcare professionals (MHPs) with mental health issues and illness (MHI), disclosure to a supervisor at work can be a dilemma: it may facilitate support but also involves risks of stigma and discrimination. This study examined barriers and facilitators, experiences, and needs regarding disclosure of MHI to supervisors among MHPs, and compared disclosers and non-disclosers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online questionnaire was completed by 298 MHPs with MHI working in five Dutch community mental healthcare centers. Descriptive analyses summarized disclosure decisions, barriers and facilitators, experiences, and needs. Differences between disclosers and non-disclosers were examined using chi-square tests with Monte Carlo significance testing and one-way ANOVAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-thirds of participants disclosed their MHI to their supervisor. There were no differences in demographics, work position, or perceived experience (positive/negative) between disclosers and non-disclosers. Both disclosers and non-disclosers reported fears of stigmatization and discrimination, a preference for self-reliance, and difficulties discussing MHI. 70% of disclosers reported that they had no other choice but to disclose. Most disclosers also reported that their MHI affected occupational functioning, they needed workplace accommodations and that their supervisor took MHI seriously. The most frequently reported need for future disclosure was a supervisor with an understanding for MHI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The decision to (non-)disclose was strongly shaped by fears of stigma, discrimination, preferences for self-reliance, but also the perceived necessity to disclose. Supervisors play a key role in creating an environment where MHPs feel safe to disclose, which can contribute to MHPs' sustainable employability and well-being at work.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-026-10451-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: For mental healthcare professionals (MHPs) with mental health issues and illness (MHI), disclosure to a supervisor at work can be a dilemma: it may facilitate support but also involves risks of stigma and discrimination. This study examined barriers and facilitators, experiences, and needs regarding disclosure of MHI to supervisors among MHPs, and compared disclosers and non-disclosers.

Methods: A cross-sectional online questionnaire was completed by 298 MHPs with MHI working in five Dutch community mental healthcare centers. Descriptive analyses summarized disclosure decisions, barriers and facilitators, experiences, and needs. Differences between disclosers and non-disclosers were examined using chi-square tests with Monte Carlo significance testing and one-way ANOVAs.

Results: Two-thirds of participants disclosed their MHI to their supervisor. There were no differences in demographics, work position, or perceived experience (positive/negative) between disclosers and non-disclosers. Both disclosers and non-disclosers reported fears of stigmatization and discrimination, a preference for self-reliance, and difficulties discussing MHI. 70% of disclosers reported that they had no other choice but to disclose. Most disclosers also reported that their MHI affected occupational functioning, they needed workplace accommodations and that their supervisor took MHI seriously. The most frequently reported need for future disclosure was a supervisor with an understanding for MHI.

Conclusion: The decision to (non-)disclose was strongly shaped by fears of stigma, discrimination, preferences for self-reliance, but also the perceived necessity to disclose. Supervisors play a key role in creating an environment where MHPs feel safe to disclose, which can contribute to MHPs' sustainable employability and well-being at work.

心理保健专业人员对其主管的心理健康披露:调查障碍和促进因素、经验和需求。
目的:对于有精神健康问题和疾病(MHI)的精神卫生保健专业人员(MHPs)来说,在工作中向主管披露可能是一个两难的选择:它可能有助于获得支持,但也涉及耻辱和歧视的风险。本研究考察了mhp向主管披露MHI的障碍和促进因素、经验和需求,并比较了披露者和未披露者。方法:对荷兰5个社区精神卫生中心298名MHI患者进行横断面在线问卷调查。描述性分析总结了披露决策、障碍和促进因素、经验和需求。使用卡方检验、蒙特卡洛显著性检验和单因素方差分析来检验披露者和未披露者之间的差异。结果:三分之二的参与者向他们的主管透露了他们的MHI。在人口统计学、工作职位或感知经验(积极/消极)方面,披露者和非披露者之间没有差异。披露者和未披露者都报告了对污名化和歧视的恐惧,对自力更生的偏好,以及讨论MHI的困难。70%的披露者表示,他们别无选择,只能披露。大多数披露者还报告说,他们的MHI影响了职业功能,他们需要工作场所的住宿,他们的主管认真对待MHI。报告中最常见的未来披露需求是一位了解三菱重工的主管。结论:对耻辱的恐惧、歧视、对自力更生的偏好以及对披露的感知必要性强烈地影响了决定(不)披露的决定。主管在创造一个让mhp感到安全的环境方面发挥着关键作用,这有助于mhp的可持续就业能力和工作幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law.  A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书