Feasibility and acceptability of smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment for monitoring suicidal ideation among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Nepal.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Kamal Gautam, Kiran Paudel, Jeffrey A Wickersham, Sandesh Bhusal, Md Safaet Hossain Sujan, Antoine Khati, Prashu Ram Chaudhari, Navin Devkota, Ran Xu, Michael M Copenhaver, Omkar Dhungel, Pablo K Valente, Roman Shrestha
{"title":"Feasibility and acceptability of smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment for monitoring suicidal ideation among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Nepal.","authors":"Kamal Gautam, Kiran Paudel, Jeffrey A Wickersham, Sandesh Bhusal, Md Safaet Hossain Sujan, Antoine Khati, Prashu Ram Chaudhari, Navin Devkota, Ran Xu, Michael M Copenhaver, Omkar Dhungel, Pablo K Valente, Roman Shrestha","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2026.2732887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) measures suicidal thoughts and behaviors in real-time. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of smartphone-based EMA for suicide prevention among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with prior suicidal ideation or moderate-to-severe depression completed three daily smartphone EMAs for 30 days. Feasibility was measured through recruitment, retention, and compliance, and acceptability through exit surveys and interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 55 individuals screened, 50 were enrolled and completed the baseline survey. Forty-eight participants (96%) completed at least one EMA and responded to 2,943 of 4,500 prompts (65.4%). Compliance remained stable across time points and did not differ by suicidal ideation (median 76.7% in both groups). Prior suicide planning (<i>β</i>:-19.9, 95% CI:-36.2 to -3.7), chemsex engagement (<i>β</i>:-30.1, 95% CI:-50.4 to -9.7), and identity disclosure (<i>β</i>:-23.0, 95% CI:-45.8 to -1.3) were associated with lower compliance. Acceptability ratings were high (means 4.0-4.4, range 1-5). Qualitative feedback noted ease of use, self-reflection, and perceived support, alongside concerns about repetitive suicide-related questions and privacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EMA is feasible and acceptable for monitoring suicidal ideation among GBMSM in Nepal and may inform scalable digital suicide prevention interventions in similar low -and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2026.2732887","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) measures suicidal thoughts and behaviors in real-time. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of smartphone-based EMA for suicide prevention among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in Nepal.

Methods: Participants with prior suicidal ideation or moderate-to-severe depression completed three daily smartphone EMAs for 30 days. Feasibility was measured through recruitment, retention, and compliance, and acceptability through exit surveys and interviews.

Results: Of 55 individuals screened, 50 were enrolled and completed the baseline survey. Forty-eight participants (96%) completed at least one EMA and responded to 2,943 of 4,500 prompts (65.4%). Compliance remained stable across time points and did not differ by suicidal ideation (median 76.7% in both groups). Prior suicide planning (β:-19.9, 95% CI:-36.2 to -3.7), chemsex engagement (β:-30.1, 95% CI:-50.4 to -9.7), and identity disclosure (β:-23.0, 95% CI:-45.8 to -1.3) were associated with lower compliance. Acceptability ratings were high (means 4.0-4.4, range 1-5). Qualitative feedback noted ease of use, self-reflection, and perceived support, alongside concerns about repetitive suicide-related questions and privacy.

Conclusions: EMA is feasible and acceptable for monitoring suicidal ideation among GBMSM in Nepal and may inform scalable digital suicide prevention interventions in similar low -and middle-income countries.

基于智能手机的生态瞬间评估监测尼泊尔男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者自杀意念的可行性和可接受性
背景:生态瞬间评估(EMA)实时测量自杀想法和行为。本研究评估了基于智能手机的EMA在尼泊尔同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(GBMSM)中预防自杀的可行性和可接受性。方法:有自杀倾向或中度至重度抑郁症的参与者每天完成3次智能手机EMAs,持续30天。可行性通过招聘、保留和遵从性来衡量,可接受性通过退出调查和访谈来衡量。结果:55名被筛选的个体中,有50人入选并完成了基线调查。48名参与者(96%)完成了至少一个EMA,并对4,500个提示中的2,943个(65.4%)做出了回应。依从性在各个时间点保持稳定,自杀意念没有差异(两组中位数为76.7%)。先前的自杀计划(β:-19.9, 95% CI:-36.2至-3.7)、化学参与(β:-30.1, 95% CI:-50.4至-9.7)和身份披露(β:-23.0, 95% CI:-45.8至-1.3)与较低的依从性相关。可接受性评分很高(平均4.0-4.4,范围1-5)。定性反馈指出了易用性、自我反思和感知支持,以及对重复自杀相关问题和隐私的担忧。结论:EMA在尼泊尔监测GBMSM的自杀意念是可行和可接受的,可以为类似的中低收入国家提供可扩展的数字自杀预防干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书