Feasibility and acceptability of smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment for monitoring suicidal ideation among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Nepal.
Kamal Gautam, Kiran Paudel, Jeffrey A Wickersham, Sandesh Bhusal, Md Safaet Hossain Sujan, Antoine Khati, Prashu Ram Chaudhari, Navin Devkota, Ran Xu, Michael M Copenhaver, Omkar Dhungel, Pablo K Valente, Roman Shrestha
{"title":"Feasibility and acceptability of smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment for monitoring suicidal ideation among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Nepal.","authors":"Kamal Gautam, Kiran Paudel, Jeffrey A Wickersham, Sandesh Bhusal, Md Safaet Hossain Sujan, Antoine Khati, Prashu Ram Chaudhari, Navin Devkota, Ran Xu, Michael M Copenhaver, Omkar Dhungel, Pablo K Valente, Roman Shrestha","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2026.2732887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) measures suicidal thoughts and behaviors in real-time. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of smartphone-based EMA for suicide prevention among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with prior suicidal ideation or moderate-to-severe depression completed three daily smartphone EMAs for 30 days. Feasibility was measured through recruitment, retention, and compliance, and acceptability through exit surveys and interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 55 individuals screened, 50 were enrolled and completed the baseline survey. Forty-eight participants (96%) completed at least one EMA and responded to 2,943 of 4,500 prompts (65.4%). Compliance remained stable across time points and did not differ by suicidal ideation (median 76.7% in both groups). Prior suicide planning (<i>β</i>:-19.9, 95% CI:-36.2 to -3.7), chemsex engagement (<i>β</i>:-30.1, 95% CI:-50.4 to -9.7), and identity disclosure (<i>β</i>:-23.0, 95% CI:-45.8 to -1.3) were associated with lower compliance. Acceptability ratings were high (means 4.0-4.4, range 1-5). Qualitative feedback noted ease of use, self-reflection, and perceived support, alongside concerns about repetitive suicide-related questions and privacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EMA is feasible and acceptable for monitoring suicidal ideation among GBMSM in Nepal and may inform scalable digital suicide prevention interventions in similar low -and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2026.2732887","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) measures suicidal thoughts and behaviors in real-time. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of smartphone-based EMA for suicide prevention among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in Nepal.
Methods: Participants with prior suicidal ideation or moderate-to-severe depression completed three daily smartphone EMAs for 30 days. Feasibility was measured through recruitment, retention, and compliance, and acceptability through exit surveys and interviews.
Results: Of 55 individuals screened, 50 were enrolled and completed the baseline survey. Forty-eight participants (96%) completed at least one EMA and responded to 2,943 of 4,500 prompts (65.4%). Compliance remained stable across time points and did not differ by suicidal ideation (median 76.7% in both groups). Prior suicide planning (β:-19.9, 95% CI:-36.2 to -3.7), chemsex engagement (β:-30.1, 95% CI:-50.4 to -9.7), and identity disclosure (β:-23.0, 95% CI:-45.8 to -1.3) were associated with lower compliance. Acceptability ratings were high (means 4.0-4.4, range 1-5). Qualitative feedback noted ease of use, self-reflection, and perceived support, alongside concerns about repetitive suicide-related questions and privacy.
Conclusions: EMA is feasible and acceptable for monitoring suicidal ideation among GBMSM in Nepal and may inform scalable digital suicide prevention interventions in similar low -and middle-income countries.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.