Understanding rural Chinese residents' perceptions of palliative care: a grounded theory study of beliefs about a good death.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Shenglong Sun, Shengyu Zhao, Shuai Yuan, Yunling Wang
{"title":"Understanding rural Chinese residents' perceptions of palliative care: a grounded theory study of beliefs about a good death.","authors":"Shenglong Sun, Shengyu Zhao, Shuai Yuan, Yunling Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12904-026-02275-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care development in China remains marked by urban-rural inequality, with service expansion concentrated mainly in urban and better-resourced settings. Older residents in rural areas may therefore face limited access to professional palliative care, despite substantial care needs. This study aimed to explore rural Chinese residents' perceptions of, needs for, and underlying decision-making logic regarding palliative care, to inform the development of culturally responsive rural palliative care services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study used purposive sampling to recruit rural residents from nine provinces and one municipality in the Chinese mainland. After quality screening, 39 interviews involving 43 participants were included and analysed using a grounded theory approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis generated the \"Rural Belief about Good Death\" framework, comprising four interrelated dimensions: familism as the core principle, attachment to ancestral homeland as the affective orientation, traditional filial piety as the ethical norm, and family economic security as the threshold condition. Participants' attitudes towards palliative care were not shaped by medical considerations alone, but were embedded in family-centred, place-based, morally charged, and economically constrained understandings of a good death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rural palliative care in China should be developed through locally responsive models that preserve family involvement, support home-oriented care, translate palliative care into culturally meaningful terms, and reduce financial barriers. The framework offers empirical and theoretical insights for developing palliative care in rural and resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13584263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02275-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palliative care development in China remains marked by urban-rural inequality, with service expansion concentrated mainly in urban and better-resourced settings. Older residents in rural areas may therefore face limited access to professional palliative care, despite substantial care needs. This study aimed to explore rural Chinese residents' perceptions of, needs for, and underlying decision-making logic regarding palliative care, to inform the development of culturally responsive rural palliative care services.

Methods: This qualitative study used purposive sampling to recruit rural residents from nine provinces and one municipality in the Chinese mainland. After quality screening, 39 interviews involving 43 participants were included and analysed using a grounded theory approach.

Results: The analysis generated the "Rural Belief about Good Death" framework, comprising four interrelated dimensions: familism as the core principle, attachment to ancestral homeland as the affective orientation, traditional filial piety as the ethical norm, and family economic security as the threshold condition. Participants' attitudes towards palliative care were not shaped by medical considerations alone, but were embedded in family-centred, place-based, morally charged, and economically constrained understandings of a good death.

Conclusions: Rural palliative care in China should be developed through locally responsive models that preserve family involvement, support home-oriented care, translate palliative care into culturally meaningful terms, and reduce financial barriers. The framework offers empirical and theoretical insights for developing palliative care in rural and resource-limited settings.

了解中国农村居民对姑息治疗的看法:对善终信念的扎根理论研究。
背景:中国的姑息治疗发展仍然存在城乡不平等,服务扩展主要集中在城市和资源较好的地区。因此,尽管有大量的护理需求,农村地区的老年居民获得专业姑息治疗的机会可能有限。本研究旨在探讨中国农村居民对姑息治疗的认知、需求及其决策逻辑,为发展文化响应型农村姑息治疗服务提供参考。方法:采用目的抽样的定性研究方法,对中国大陆9个省、1个直辖市的农村居民进行调查。经过质量筛选,纳入39个访谈,涉及43名参与者,并使用扎根理论方法进行分析。结果:分析生成了“农村善死信念”框架,该框架包括以家庭主义为核心原则、以祖土依恋为情感取向、以传统孝道为伦理规范、以家庭经济保障为门槛条件四个相互关联的维度。参与者对姑息治疗的态度不仅仅是由医疗考虑决定的,而是植根于以家庭为中心、以地方为基础、道德负责和经济限制的对善死的理解。结论:中国农村姑息治疗应通过本地响应模式发展,保持家庭参与,支持以家庭为导向的护理,将姑息治疗转化为有文化意义的术语,并减少经济障碍。该框架为在农村和资源有限的环境中发展姑息治疗提供了经验和理论见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书