Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST).

IF 2.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2026-09-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2025-002191
Asanthi Ratnasekera, Rishi Rattan, Bishwajit Bhattacharya, Zugui Zhang, Madison Harris, Sirivan S Seng, Connor Magura, Christopher A Butts, Judy Rabinowitz, Jordan Michael Kirsch, Ida Molavi, Haytham Kaafarani, Tejal S Brahmbhatt, Michael W Cripps, Nikolay Bugaev, John J Como
{"title":"Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST).","authors":"Asanthi Ratnasekera, Rishi Rattan, Bishwajit Bhattacharya, Zugui Zhang, Madison Harris, Sirivan S Seng, Connor Magura, Christopher A Butts, Judy Rabinowitz, Jordan Michael Kirsch, Ida Molavi, Haytham Kaafarani, Tejal S Brahmbhatt, Michael W Cripps, Nikolay Bugaev, John J Como","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-002191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) require an individualized approach and may not be eligible for cholecystectomy. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the management of ACC in patients with either high operative risk or delayed presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An evidence-based systematic review was performed to answer the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes (PICO) questions. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024610156). An academic health science librarian and lead authors developed the search strategy. The search was conducted in Medline (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane CENTRAL (Ovid), and Web of Science. The search strategy was written for Medline and translated using each database's syntax, subject headings, and search fields. An initial search, conducted on August 3, 2020, was updated on June 5, 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 studies were identified. We conditionally recommend that high-risk patients with ACC undergo treatment with antibiotics alone versus using percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) and antibiotics. No recommendation was made to treat patients with ACC with more than 5 days of symptoms with either cholecystectomy or antibiotics. No recommendation was made to treat patients with ACC with more than 5 days of symptoms with PC or antibiotics. We conditionally recommend removing the PC catheter without performing cholecystectomy after resolution of ACC in high-risk patients who have evidence of cystic duct patency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risks of cholecystectomy and PC must be balanced in patients who are high-risk for operative management.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"11 3","pages":"e002191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13583704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2025-002191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) require an individualized approach and may not be eligible for cholecystectomy. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the management of ACC in patients with either high operative risk or delayed presentation.

Methods: An evidence-based systematic review was performed to answer the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes (PICO) questions. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024610156). An academic health science librarian and lead authors developed the search strategy. The search was conducted in Medline (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane CENTRAL (Ovid), and Web of Science. The search strategy was written for Medline and translated using each database's syntax, subject headings, and search fields. An initial search, conducted on August 3, 2020, was updated on June 5, 2025.

Results: A total of 25 studies were identified. We conditionally recommend that high-risk patients with ACC undergo treatment with antibiotics alone versus using percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) and antibiotics. No recommendation was made to treat patients with ACC with more than 5 days of symptoms with either cholecystectomy or antibiotics. No recommendation was made to treat patients with ACC with more than 5 days of symptoms with PC or antibiotics. We conditionally recommend removing the PC catheter without performing cholecystectomy after resolution of ACC in high-risk patients who have evidence of cystic duct patency.

Conclusion: Risks of cholecystectomy and PC must be balanced in patients who are high-risk for operative management.

Level of evidence: Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.

高风险患者的急性胆囊炎:来自东部创伤外科协会(EAST)的系统回顾、荟萃分析和实践管理指南。
背景:急性结石性胆囊炎(ACC)的高危患者需要个体化治疗,可能不适合胆囊切除术。本系统综述的目的是评估高手术风险或延迟表现的ACC患者的管理。方法:采用基于证据的系统评价来回答人群、干预、比较物、结果(PICO)问题。该系统评价已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024610156)。一位学术健康科学图书管理员和主要作者开发了搜索策略。检索在Medline (Ovid)、Embase (Elsevier)、Cochrane CENTRAL (Ovid)和Web of Science中进行。搜索策略是为Medline编写的,并使用每个数据库的语法、主题标题和搜索字段进行翻译。最初的搜索于2020年8月3日进行,于2025年6月5日更新。结果:共确定了25项研究。我们有条件地推荐高危ACC患者单独使用抗生素治疗,而不是使用经皮胆囊造口术(PC)和抗生素。没有建议对症状超过5天的ACC患者进行胆囊切除术或抗生素治疗。没有建议用PC或抗生素治疗症状超过5天的ACC患者。我们有条件地推荐在有胆囊管通畅证据的高危患者ACC消退后不行胆囊切除术而取下PC导管。结论:对于高危患者,应权衡胆囊切除术与PC手术的风险。证据等级:III级,系统评价和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书