Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST).
Asanthi Ratnasekera, Rishi Rattan, Bishwajit Bhattacharya, Zugui Zhang, Madison Harris, Sirivan S Seng, Connor Magura, Christopher A Butts, Judy Rabinowitz, Jordan Michael Kirsch, Ida Molavi, Haytham Kaafarani, Tejal S Brahmbhatt, Michael W Cripps, Nikolay Bugaev, John J Como
{"title":"Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST).","authors":"Asanthi Ratnasekera, Rishi Rattan, Bishwajit Bhattacharya, Zugui Zhang, Madison Harris, Sirivan S Seng, Connor Magura, Christopher A Butts, Judy Rabinowitz, Jordan Michael Kirsch, Ida Molavi, Haytham Kaafarani, Tejal S Brahmbhatt, Michael W Cripps, Nikolay Bugaev, John J Como","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-002191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) require an individualized approach and may not be eligible for cholecystectomy. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the management of ACC in patients with either high operative risk or delayed presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An evidence-based systematic review was performed to answer the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes (PICO) questions. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024610156). An academic health science librarian and lead authors developed the search strategy. The search was conducted in Medline (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane CENTRAL (Ovid), and Web of Science. The search strategy was written for Medline and translated using each database's syntax, subject headings, and search fields. An initial search, conducted on August 3, 2020, was updated on June 5, 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 studies were identified. We conditionally recommend that high-risk patients with ACC undergo treatment with antibiotics alone versus using percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) and antibiotics. No recommendation was made to treat patients with ACC with more than 5 days of symptoms with either cholecystectomy or antibiotics. No recommendation was made to treat patients with ACC with more than 5 days of symptoms with PC or antibiotics. We conditionally recommend removing the PC catheter without performing cholecystectomy after resolution of ACC in high-risk patients who have evidence of cystic duct patency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risks of cholecystectomy and PC must be balanced in patients who are high-risk for operative management.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"11 3","pages":"e002191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13583704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2025-002191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: High-risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) require an individualized approach and may not be eligible for cholecystectomy. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the management of ACC in patients with either high operative risk or delayed presentation.
Methods: An evidence-based systematic review was performed to answer the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes (PICO) questions. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024610156). An academic health science librarian and lead authors developed the search strategy. The search was conducted in Medline (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane CENTRAL (Ovid), and Web of Science. The search strategy was written for Medline and translated using each database's syntax, subject headings, and search fields. An initial search, conducted on August 3, 2020, was updated on June 5, 2025.
Results: A total of 25 studies were identified. We conditionally recommend that high-risk patients with ACC undergo treatment with antibiotics alone versus using percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) and antibiotics. No recommendation was made to treat patients with ACC with more than 5 days of symptoms with either cholecystectomy or antibiotics. No recommendation was made to treat patients with ACC with more than 5 days of symptoms with PC or antibiotics. We conditionally recommend removing the PC catheter without performing cholecystectomy after resolution of ACC in high-risk patients who have evidence of cystic duct patency.
Conclusion: Risks of cholecystectomy and PC must be balanced in patients who are high-risk for operative management.
Level of evidence: Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.
背景:急性结石性胆囊炎(ACC)的高危患者需要个体化治疗,可能不适合胆囊切除术。本系统综述的目的是评估高手术风险或延迟表现的ACC患者的管理。方法:采用基于证据的系统评价来回答人群、干预、比较物、结果(PICO)问题。该系统评价已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024610156)。一位学术健康科学图书管理员和主要作者开发了搜索策略。检索在Medline (Ovid)、Embase (Elsevier)、Cochrane CENTRAL (Ovid)和Web of Science中进行。搜索策略是为Medline编写的,并使用每个数据库的语法、主题标题和搜索字段进行翻译。最初的搜索于2020年8月3日进行,于2025年6月5日更新。结果:共确定了25项研究。我们有条件地推荐高危ACC患者单独使用抗生素治疗,而不是使用经皮胆囊造口术(PC)和抗生素。没有建议对症状超过5天的ACC患者进行胆囊切除术或抗生素治疗。没有建议用PC或抗生素治疗症状超过5天的ACC患者。我们有条件地推荐在有胆囊管通畅证据的高危患者ACC消退后不行胆囊切除术而取下PC导管。结论:对于高危患者,应权衡胆囊切除术与PC手术的风险。证据等级:III级,系统评价和荟萃分析。