The utility of focused transthoracic echocardiography in preoperative assessment: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of current evidence.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
William J McIver, Sadie Dillon, Keelie Schofield, Jack Merritt, Elizabeth Morgan, Mansoor N Bangash, Dhruv Parekh
{"title":"The utility of focused transthoracic echocardiography in preoperative assessment: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of current evidence.","authors":"William J McIver, Sadie Dillon, Keelie Schofield, Jack Merritt, Elizabeth Morgan, Mansoor N Bangash, Dhruv Parekh","doi":"10.1007/s10877-026-01503-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, diagnostic yield, accuracy, impact on management and clinical outcomes of focused transthoracic echocardiography (fTTE) in preoperative assessment. Medline, Embase and Cochrane Trials were searched to 19 January 2026. Studies evaluating preoperative fTTE were included. Cardiac surgery, examinations performed by cardiologists or cardiac physiologists, and intraoperative or postoperative examinations were excluded. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed for comparative effectiveness studies. Thirty-five studies involving 3728 patients were included. Study populations, scanning protocols and operator experience were highly heterogeneous. Median feasibility was 92.5%, with examination times of 3-16 min. Cardiac abnormalities were identified in 22-64% of patients. No formal diagnostic-accuracy studies were identified; agreement with formal TTE was variable and clinically important missed diagnoses were reported. Step-up and step-down changes in management occurred in 48 (21-54) % and 20 (1-49) % of patients, respectively. Three studies comparing plans before and after fTTE found no overall change in anaesthetic management. Individual changes in management included increased arterial-line use and reduced postoperative intensive-care admission. Four randomised trials found that echocardiography-guided pre-induction fluid therapy reduced post-induction hypotension. Three randomised trials in emergency surgical populations showed no improvement in mortality or morbidity compared with standard care. Preoperative fTTE is feasible and can identify clinically relevant cardiac and haemodynamic abnormalities and influence perioperative management. However, performance is operator- and setting-dependent, diagnostic-accuracy evidence is sparse, and benefit for patient-centred outcomes remains unproven.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01503-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, diagnostic yield, accuracy, impact on management and clinical outcomes of focused transthoracic echocardiography (fTTE) in preoperative assessment. Medline, Embase and Cochrane Trials were searched to 19 January 2026. Studies evaluating preoperative fTTE were included. Cardiac surgery, examinations performed by cardiologists or cardiac physiologists, and intraoperative or postoperative examinations were excluded. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed for comparative effectiveness studies. Thirty-five studies involving 3728 patients were included. Study populations, scanning protocols and operator experience were highly heterogeneous. Median feasibility was 92.5%, with examination times of 3-16 min. Cardiac abnormalities were identified in 22-64% of patients. No formal diagnostic-accuracy studies were identified; agreement with formal TTE was variable and clinically important missed diagnoses were reported. Step-up and step-down changes in management occurred in 48 (21-54) % and 20 (1-49) % of patients, respectively. Three studies comparing plans before and after fTTE found no overall change in anaesthetic management. Individual changes in management included increased arterial-line use and reduced postoperative intensive-care admission. Four randomised trials found that echocardiography-guided pre-induction fluid therapy reduced post-induction hypotension. Three randomised trials in emergency surgical populations showed no improvement in mortality or morbidity compared with standard care. Preoperative fTTE is feasible and can identify clinically relevant cardiac and haemodynamic abnormalities and influence perioperative management. However, performance is operator- and setting-dependent, diagnostic-accuracy evidence is sparse, and benefit for patient-centred outcomes remains unproven.

聚焦经胸超声心动图在术前评估中的应用:当前证据的系统回顾和叙述综合。
我们旨在评估聚焦经胸超声心动图(fTTE)在术前评估中的可行性、诊断率、准确性、对管理的影响和临床结果。检索Medline、Embase和Cochrane Trials至2026年1月19日。纳入评估术前fTTE的研究。排除了心脏手术、心脏病专家或心脏生理学家进行的检查以及术中或术后检查。筛选和数据提取由两名审稿人独立完成。对比较有效性研究的偏倚风险进行了评估。纳入35项研究,涉及3728例患者。研究人群、扫描方案和操作员经验高度异质性。中位可行性为92.5%,检查时间为3 ~ 16 min。22-64%的患者发现心脏异常。未发现正式的诊断准确性研究;与正式TTE的一致性是可变的,临床上重要的漏诊报告。分别有48(21-54)%和20(1-49)%的患者出现了管理上的上升和下降变化。三个比较fTTE前后计划的研究发现麻醉管理总体上没有变化。治疗的个体变化包括动脉导管使用的增加和术后重症监护住院的减少。四项随机试验发现超声心动图引导的诱导前液体治疗可减少诱导后低血压。在急诊手术人群中进行的三项随机试验显示,与标准治疗相比,死亡率或发病率没有改善。术前fTTE是可行的,可以识别临床相关的心脏和血流动力学异常,影响围手术期的处理。然而,性能取决于操作人员和环境,诊断准确性的证据很少,以患者为中心的结果的益处仍未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书