William J McIver, Sadie Dillon, Keelie Schofield, Jack Merritt, Elizabeth Morgan, Mansoor N Bangash, Dhruv Parekh
{"title":"The utility of focused transthoracic echocardiography in preoperative assessment: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of current evidence.","authors":"William J McIver, Sadie Dillon, Keelie Schofield, Jack Merritt, Elizabeth Morgan, Mansoor N Bangash, Dhruv Parekh","doi":"10.1007/s10877-026-01503-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, diagnostic yield, accuracy, impact on management and clinical outcomes of focused transthoracic echocardiography (fTTE) in preoperative assessment. Medline, Embase and Cochrane Trials were searched to 19 January 2026. Studies evaluating preoperative fTTE were included. Cardiac surgery, examinations performed by cardiologists or cardiac physiologists, and intraoperative or postoperative examinations were excluded. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed for comparative effectiveness studies. Thirty-five studies involving 3728 patients were included. Study populations, scanning protocols and operator experience were highly heterogeneous. Median feasibility was 92.5%, with examination times of 3-16 min. Cardiac abnormalities were identified in 22-64% of patients. No formal diagnostic-accuracy studies were identified; agreement with formal TTE was variable and clinically important missed diagnoses were reported. Step-up and step-down changes in management occurred in 48 (21-54) % and 20 (1-49) % of patients, respectively. Three studies comparing plans before and after fTTE found no overall change in anaesthetic management. Individual changes in management included increased arterial-line use and reduced postoperative intensive-care admission. Four randomised trials found that echocardiography-guided pre-induction fluid therapy reduced post-induction hypotension. Three randomised trials in emergency surgical populations showed no improvement in mortality or morbidity compared with standard care. Preoperative fTTE is feasible and can identify clinically relevant cardiac and haemodynamic abnormalities and influence perioperative management. However, performance is operator- and setting-dependent, diagnostic-accuracy evidence is sparse, and benefit for patient-centred outcomes remains unproven.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01503-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, diagnostic yield, accuracy, impact on management and clinical outcomes of focused transthoracic echocardiography (fTTE) in preoperative assessment. Medline, Embase and Cochrane Trials were searched to 19 January 2026. Studies evaluating preoperative fTTE were included. Cardiac surgery, examinations performed by cardiologists or cardiac physiologists, and intraoperative or postoperative examinations were excluded. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed for comparative effectiveness studies. Thirty-five studies involving 3728 patients were included. Study populations, scanning protocols and operator experience were highly heterogeneous. Median feasibility was 92.5%, with examination times of 3-16 min. Cardiac abnormalities were identified in 22-64% of patients. No formal diagnostic-accuracy studies were identified; agreement with formal TTE was variable and clinically important missed diagnoses were reported. Step-up and step-down changes in management occurred in 48 (21-54) % and 20 (1-49) % of patients, respectively. Three studies comparing plans before and after fTTE found no overall change in anaesthetic management. Individual changes in management included increased arterial-line use and reduced postoperative intensive-care admission. Four randomised trials found that echocardiography-guided pre-induction fluid therapy reduced post-induction hypotension. Three randomised trials in emergency surgical populations showed no improvement in mortality or morbidity compared with standard care. Preoperative fTTE is feasible and can identify clinically relevant cardiac and haemodynamic abnormalities and influence perioperative management. However, performance is operator- and setting-dependent, diagnostic-accuracy evidence is sparse, and benefit for patient-centred outcomes remains unproven.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.