The short-term effects of dry cupping the lumbar paraspinal muscles on pain and function in individuals with non-specific low back pain: A single-blind randomized trial.
Natasha Scavarelli, Carlos Zerpa, Kathryn Sinden, Paolo Sanzo
{"title":"The short-term effects of dry cupping the lumbar paraspinal muscles on pain and function in individuals with non-specific low back pain: A single-blind randomized trial.","authors":"Natasha Scavarelli, Carlos Zerpa, Kathryn Sinden, Paolo Sanzo","doi":"10.1177/10538127261487533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is a major global cause of disability, contributing to substantial healthcare costs and reduced quality of life. Current treatments often provide inconsistent relief. Dry cupping has shown potential for improving pain and function, but high-quality evidence supporting its efficacy in NSLBP remains limited. <b>Objective:</b> This study assessed the short-term effects of dry cupping on pain and function in individuals with NSLBP. <b>Methods:</b> A single-blind randomized clinical trial enrolled 52 adults (31 females, 21 males, aged 18-55 years) with clinician-confirmed NSLBP (otherwise healthy; no specific spinal pathology, leg symptoms, pregnancy, cancer, prior lower-body surgery, or bleeding disorders). Participants were recruited from a university, local clinics, and advertisements and allocated to an intervention or placebo group. Treatment consisted of three sessions, 48 h apart. Primary outcomes were pain (pressure pain threshold [PPT] using algometry and Numeric Pain Rating Scale [NPRS]); secondary outcomes were function (Sit-and-Reach, inclinometry, Roland-Morris Questionnaire, and Patient Global Impression of Change Scale [PGICS]). Data were analyzed using mixed factorial ANOVAs. <b>Results:</b> Compared with placebo, dry cupping produced greater improvements in PPT (between-group difference 7.9 N, 95% CI 3.54-12.29; <i>p</i> < .001, η<sup>2</sup>=.604), NPRS (2.42 points, 95% CI 1.69-3.15; <i>p</i> < .001, η<sup>2</sup>=.660), Sit-and-Reach (5.5 cm, 95% CI 0.28-10.88; <i>p</i> < .001, η<sup>2</sup>=.372), inclinometry (7.1°, 95% CI 2.47-11.69; <i>p</i> < .001, η<sup>2</sup>=.335), Roland-Morris (1.9 points, 95% CI 0.62-3.31; <i>p</i> = .002, η<sup>2</sup>=.115), and PGICS (1.70, 95% CI 0.92-2.48; <i>p</i> < .001, η<sup>2</sup>=.158). <b>Conclusion:</b> Dry cupping may provide short-term improvements in pain and function and may be a useful adjunct for NSLBP management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127261487533"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261487533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is a major global cause of disability, contributing to substantial healthcare costs and reduced quality of life. Current treatments often provide inconsistent relief. Dry cupping has shown potential for improving pain and function, but high-quality evidence supporting its efficacy in NSLBP remains limited. Objective: This study assessed the short-term effects of dry cupping on pain and function in individuals with NSLBP. Methods: A single-blind randomized clinical trial enrolled 52 adults (31 females, 21 males, aged 18-55 years) with clinician-confirmed NSLBP (otherwise healthy; no specific spinal pathology, leg symptoms, pregnancy, cancer, prior lower-body surgery, or bleeding disorders). Participants were recruited from a university, local clinics, and advertisements and allocated to an intervention or placebo group. Treatment consisted of three sessions, 48 h apart. Primary outcomes were pain (pressure pain threshold [PPT] using algometry and Numeric Pain Rating Scale [NPRS]); secondary outcomes were function (Sit-and-Reach, inclinometry, Roland-Morris Questionnaire, and Patient Global Impression of Change Scale [PGICS]). Data were analyzed using mixed factorial ANOVAs. Results: Compared with placebo, dry cupping produced greater improvements in PPT (between-group difference 7.9 N, 95% CI 3.54-12.29; p < .001, η2=.604), NPRS (2.42 points, 95% CI 1.69-3.15; p < .001, η2=.660), Sit-and-Reach (5.5 cm, 95% CI 0.28-10.88; p < .001, η2=.372), inclinometry (7.1°, 95% CI 2.47-11.69; p < .001, η2=.335), Roland-Morris (1.9 points, 95% CI 0.62-3.31; p = .002, η2=.115), and PGICS (1.70, 95% CI 0.92-2.48; p < .001, η2=.158). Conclusion: Dry cupping may provide short-term improvements in pain and function and may be a useful adjunct for NSLBP management.
背景:非特异性腰痛(NSLBP)是全球主要的致残原因,导致大量医疗保健费用和生活质量下降。目前的治疗方法往往提供不稳定的缓解。干拔罐已显示出改善疼痛和功能的潜力,但支持其对NSLBP疗效的高质量证据仍然有限。目的:本研究评估干拔罐对非slbp患者疼痛和功能的短期影响。方法:一项单盲随机临床试验纳入了52名临床证实的非slbp患者(31名女性,21名男性,年龄18-55岁)(其他方面健康,无特定脊柱病理、腿部症状、妊娠、癌症、既往下半身手术或出血病)。参与者从大学、当地诊所和广告中招募,并被分配到干预组或安慰剂组。治疗分为三个阶段,间隔48小时。主要结局是疼痛(用计算法和数值疼痛评定量表(NPRS)计算的压痛阈值[PPT]);次要结果是功能(坐-伸、倾斜度测量、Roland-Morris问卷和患者总体变化印象量表[PGICS])。数据分析采用混合因子方差分析。结果:与安慰剂相比,干拔罐在PPT(组间差异7.9 N, 95% CI 3.54-12.29; p = 0.604)、NPRS(2.42分,95% CI 1.69-3.15; p = 0.660)、坐伸(5.5 cm, 95% CI 0.28-10.88; p =.372)、测斜(7.1°,95% CI 2.47-11.69; p =.335)、罗兰-莫里斯(1.9分,95% CI 0.62-3.31; p =。002年,η2 = .115)和PGICS (1.70, 95% CI 0.92 -2.48; p 2 =比赛)。结论:干拔罐可在短期内改善疼痛和功能,可能是治疗NSLBP的有效辅助手段。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.