Performance-based functional assessment in ankylosing spondylitis: Clinical utility and validation of the Back Performance Scale (BPS-TR).

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Gokhan Maras, Gamze Gulsun Pala, Belma Degerli Maras
{"title":"Performance-based functional assessment in ankylosing spondylitis: Clinical utility and validation of the Back Performance Scale (BPS-TR).","authors":"Gokhan Maras, Gamze Gulsun Pala, Belma Degerli Maras","doi":"10.1177/10538127261489868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSelf-report questionnaires are commonly used to assess functional status in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, these instruments may not fully reflect patients' actual physical performance. The Back Performance Scale (BPS-TR) may provide a more objective, performance-based approach to evaluating functional limitations. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the BPS-TR in patients with AS.MethodsA total of 107 patients with AS were included. Functional performance was assessed using five standardized tasks: sock, pick-up, roll-up, fingertip-to-floor, and lifting tests. Convergent validity was examined using BASFI, BASDAI, ASQoL, and BASMI. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in 40 patients after a one-week interval using the intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC<sub>2,1</sub>].ResultsThe BPS-TR demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability [ICC<sub>2,1</sub> = 0.890] and acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.787). Measurement error was small (SEM = 0.53; MDC<sub>95</sub> = 1.47). Significant moderate correlations were found with BASFI (r = 0.654), ASQoL (r = 0.590), BASDAI (r = 0.615), and BASMI (r = 0.630) (all p < 0.001). Exploratory factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure explaining 62.4% of the total variance.ConclusionsThe BPS-TR is a valid, reliable, and practical performance-based scale for assessing functional limitations in patients with AS. Its use alongside self-report questionnaires may contribute to a more comprehensive evaluation of functional status in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127261489868"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261489868","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSelf-report questionnaires are commonly used to assess functional status in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, these instruments may not fully reflect patients' actual physical performance. The Back Performance Scale (BPS-TR) may provide a more objective, performance-based approach to evaluating functional limitations. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the BPS-TR in patients with AS.MethodsA total of 107 patients with AS were included. Functional performance was assessed using five standardized tasks: sock, pick-up, roll-up, fingertip-to-floor, and lifting tests. Convergent validity was examined using BASFI, BASDAI, ASQoL, and BASMI. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in 40 patients after a one-week interval using the intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2,1].ResultsThe BPS-TR demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability [ICC2,1 = 0.890] and acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.787). Measurement error was small (SEM = 0.53; MDC95 = 1.47). Significant moderate correlations were found with BASFI (r = 0.654), ASQoL (r = 0.590), BASDAI (r = 0.615), and BASMI (r = 0.630) (all p < 0.001). Exploratory factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure explaining 62.4% of the total variance.ConclusionsThe BPS-TR is a valid, reliable, and practical performance-based scale for assessing functional limitations in patients with AS. Its use alongside self-report questionnaires may contribute to a more comprehensive evaluation of functional status in clinical practice.

强直性脊柱炎基于性能的功能评估:背部性能量表(BPS-TR)的临床应用和验证。
背景自我报告问卷通常用于评估强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者的功能状态。然而,这些仪器可能不能完全反映患者的实际身体表现。背部性能量表(BPS-TR)可以提供一种更客观、基于性能的方法来评估功能限制。本研究旨在探讨AS患者BPS-TR的心理测量特性。方法分析107例AS患者的临床资料。功能表现通过五个标准化任务进行评估:袜子、捡起、卷起、指尖触地和举起测试。采用BASFI、BASDAI、ASQoL和BASMI检验收敛效度。采用类内相关系数对40例患者间隔一周后的重测信度进行评估[ICC2,1]。结果BPS-TR具有良好的重测信度[ICC2,1 = 0.890]和良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.787)。测量误差较小(SEM = 0.53; MDC95 = 1.47)。与BASFI (r = 0.654)、ASQoL (r = 0.590)、BASDAI (r = 0.615)、BASMI (r = 0.630)存在显著的中度相关性(p < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书