{"title":"Performance-based functional assessment in ankylosing spondylitis: Clinical utility and validation of the Back Performance Scale (BPS-TR).","authors":"Gokhan Maras, Gamze Gulsun Pala, Belma Degerli Maras","doi":"10.1177/10538127261489868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSelf-report questionnaires are commonly used to assess functional status in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, these instruments may not fully reflect patients' actual physical performance. The Back Performance Scale (BPS-TR) may provide a more objective, performance-based approach to evaluating functional limitations. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the BPS-TR in patients with AS.MethodsA total of 107 patients with AS were included. Functional performance was assessed using five standardized tasks: sock, pick-up, roll-up, fingertip-to-floor, and lifting tests. Convergent validity was examined using BASFI, BASDAI, ASQoL, and BASMI. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in 40 patients after a one-week interval using the intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC<sub>2,1</sub>].ResultsThe BPS-TR demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability [ICC<sub>2,1</sub> = 0.890] and acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.787). Measurement error was small (SEM = 0.53; MDC<sub>95</sub> = 1.47). Significant moderate correlations were found with BASFI (r = 0.654), ASQoL (r = 0.590), BASDAI (r = 0.615), and BASMI (r = 0.630) (all p < 0.001). Exploratory factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure explaining 62.4% of the total variance.ConclusionsThe BPS-TR is a valid, reliable, and practical performance-based scale for assessing functional limitations in patients with AS. Its use alongside self-report questionnaires may contribute to a more comprehensive evaluation of functional status in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127261489868"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261489868","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundSelf-report questionnaires are commonly used to assess functional status in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, these instruments may not fully reflect patients' actual physical performance. The Back Performance Scale (BPS-TR) may provide a more objective, performance-based approach to evaluating functional limitations. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the BPS-TR in patients with AS.MethodsA total of 107 patients with AS were included. Functional performance was assessed using five standardized tasks: sock, pick-up, roll-up, fingertip-to-floor, and lifting tests. Convergent validity was examined using BASFI, BASDAI, ASQoL, and BASMI. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in 40 patients after a one-week interval using the intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2,1].ResultsThe BPS-TR demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability [ICC2,1 = 0.890] and acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.787). Measurement error was small (SEM = 0.53; MDC95 = 1.47). Significant moderate correlations were found with BASFI (r = 0.654), ASQoL (r = 0.590), BASDAI (r = 0.615), and BASMI (r = 0.630) (all p < 0.001). Exploratory factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure explaining 62.4% of the total variance.ConclusionsThe BPS-TR is a valid, reliable, and practical performance-based scale for assessing functional limitations in patients with AS. Its use alongside self-report questionnaires may contribute to a more comprehensive evaluation of functional status in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.