Patient, consumer and societal values, perceptions and preferences on high-cost gene therapies.

IF 5.9 3区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Amanda Rush, Maria Gomez, Kristine Pierce, De Abreu Lourenco Richard, Kylie Mason, Kirsten Howard, Garry Lynch, Pippy Walker, Rosalie Viney, Jo Watson
{"title":"Patient, consumer and societal values, perceptions and preferences on high-cost gene therapies.","authors":"Amanda Rush, Maria Gomez, Kristine Pierce, De Abreu Lourenco Richard, Kylie Mason, Kirsten Howard, Garry Lynch, Pippy Walker, Rosalie Viney, Jo Watson","doi":"10.1038/s41434-026-00643-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Novel cell and gene therapies hold great potential to alter the clinical course of a range of chronic diseases, yet uncertainties remain regarding their long-term efficacy and impact. These uncertainties pose challenges for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) committees, which systematically assess health interventions seeking public subsidy. Haematological conditions are a common target for gene therapies; however, the perspectives of those both directly and indirectly impacted by funding decisions for therapies in this disease area have not been investigated. To support future HTA considerations of gene therapies, we explored the perspectives of individuals living with haematological conditions who may become eligible for such treatments, alongside their caregivers and members of the general population in Australia. We undertook interviews and focus groups with 55 participants with lived experience and 32 general population members to elicit responses on what might influence decision making on gene therapies; the potential benefits or harms of gene therapies; any perceived barriers to gene therapy access; and/or uncertainties associated with the respective gene therapy. Here, we describe the parallel perspectives of health consumers and the general population, providing five key areas of consideration for HTA decision-making: individual patient and disease factors; geographical, financial and clinical access; balancing disease and quality of life benefits with adverse effects; individual and health system costs; and remaining treatment uncertainties. These will require resolution before widespread acceptability and uptake of gene therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12699,"journal":{"name":"Gene Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gene Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41434-026-00643-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Novel cell and gene therapies hold great potential to alter the clinical course of a range of chronic diseases, yet uncertainties remain regarding their long-term efficacy and impact. These uncertainties pose challenges for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) committees, which systematically assess health interventions seeking public subsidy. Haematological conditions are a common target for gene therapies; however, the perspectives of those both directly and indirectly impacted by funding decisions for therapies in this disease area have not been investigated. To support future HTA considerations of gene therapies, we explored the perspectives of individuals living with haematological conditions who may become eligible for such treatments, alongside their caregivers and members of the general population in Australia. We undertook interviews and focus groups with 55 participants with lived experience and 32 general population members to elicit responses on what might influence decision making on gene therapies; the potential benefits or harms of gene therapies; any perceived barriers to gene therapy access; and/or uncertainties associated with the respective gene therapy. Here, we describe the parallel perspectives of health consumers and the general population, providing five key areas of consideration for HTA decision-making: individual patient and disease factors; geographical, financial and clinical access; balancing disease and quality of life benefits with adverse effects; individual and health system costs; and remaining treatment uncertainties. These will require resolution before widespread acceptability and uptake of gene therapy.

患者、消费者和社会价值观、对高成本基因疗法的看法和偏好。
新的细胞和基因疗法具有改变一系列慢性疾病临床病程的巨大潜力,但其长期疗效和影响仍存在不确定性。这些不确定性给卫生技术评估委员会带来了挑战,这些委员会系统地评估寻求公共补贴的卫生干预措施。血液病是基因治疗的常见目标;然而,那些直接或间接受到该疾病领域治疗资金决定影响的人的观点尚未得到调查。为了支持未来HTA对基因治疗的考虑,我们探讨了可能有资格接受这种治疗的血液病患者的观点,以及他们的照顾者和澳大利亚普通人群的成员。我们对55名有生活经验的参与者和32名普通人群成员进行了访谈和焦点小组,以获取可能影响基因治疗决策的因素的回应;基因疗法的潜在益处或危害;任何阻碍基因治疗的障碍;和/或与各自基因治疗相关的不确定性。在这里,我们描述了健康消费者和一般人群的平行观点,提供了HTA决策的五个关键考虑领域:个体患者和疾病因素;地理、财政和临床准入;平衡疾病和生活质量的好处与不利影响;个人和卫生系统费用;还有治疗的不确定性。在基因疗法被广泛接受和接受之前,这些问题需要得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gene Therapy
Gene Therapy 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Gene Therapy covers both the research and clinical applications of novel therapeutic techniques based on a genetic component. Over the last few decades, significant advances in technologies ranging from identifying novel genetic targets that cause disease through to clinical studies, which show therapeutic benefit, have elevated this multidisciplinary field to the forefront of modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书