Strategies for High-Quality Spine Surgery in Resource-Limited Settings: The Five-P Framework for Equitable Surgical Delivery.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andrei Fernandes Joaquim, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
{"title":"Strategies for High-Quality Spine Surgery in Resource-Limited Settings: The Five-P Framework for Equitable Surgical Delivery.","authors":"Andrei Fernandes Joaquim, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1177/21925682261491746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignNarrative review with a Conceptual Framework.ObjectivesLow- and middle-income countries (LMICs), home to approximately 80-85% of the global population, face a disproportionate burden of spinal disorders and limited access to timely, safe, and affordable surgical care. This review proposes a practical framework for delivering high-value spine care in LMICs by integrating evidence on health systems, value-based healthcare, and spine surgery into five strategic domains: Policy & Governance, Patient Selection, Perioperative Efficiency, Products & Technology, and Protection (the Five-P Framework).MethodsA narrative review with a structured literature search was conducted using PubMed and gray literature. Studies on spinal care delivery, health systems, cost-effectiveness, and surgical strategies in LMICs or comparable settings were qualitatively synthesized into thematic domains.ResultsFive domains were identified: (1) <b>P</b>olicy & Governance, including centralization of care, regulation of financial incentives, anti-corruption measures, and complication reduction; (2) <b>P</b>atient Selection, emphasizing evidence-based indications; (3) <b>P</b>erioperative Efficiency, including enhanced recovery pathways, ambulatory surgery, and standardized protocols; (4) <b>P</b>roducts & Technology, focusing on resource optimization and context-appropriate technologies, including locally manufactured implants; and (5) <b>P</b>rotection, promoting balanced medicolegal frameworks. Together, these domains aim to maximize value, improve access, and reduce unnecessary procedures and inefficient resource utilization.ConclusionThe Five-P Framework is a theoretical model that provides a system-level strategy to improve access to high-value spine care in LMICs through appropriate patient selection, efficient perioperative care, and optimal use of limited resources. Future studies to validate this proposal are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682261491746"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13588966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261491746","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignNarrative review with a Conceptual Framework.ObjectivesLow- and middle-income countries (LMICs), home to approximately 80-85% of the global population, face a disproportionate burden of spinal disorders and limited access to timely, safe, and affordable surgical care. This review proposes a practical framework for delivering high-value spine care in LMICs by integrating evidence on health systems, value-based healthcare, and spine surgery into five strategic domains: Policy & Governance, Patient Selection, Perioperative Efficiency, Products & Technology, and Protection (the Five-P Framework).MethodsA narrative review with a structured literature search was conducted using PubMed and gray literature. Studies on spinal care delivery, health systems, cost-effectiveness, and surgical strategies in LMICs or comparable settings were qualitatively synthesized into thematic domains.ResultsFive domains were identified: (1) Policy & Governance, including centralization of care, regulation of financial incentives, anti-corruption measures, and complication reduction; (2) Patient Selection, emphasizing evidence-based indications; (3) Perioperative Efficiency, including enhanced recovery pathways, ambulatory surgery, and standardized protocols; (4) Products & Technology, focusing on resource optimization and context-appropriate technologies, including locally manufactured implants; and (5) Protection, promoting balanced medicolegal frameworks. Together, these domains aim to maximize value, improve access, and reduce unnecessary procedures and inefficient resource utilization.ConclusionThe Five-P Framework is a theoretical model that provides a system-level strategy to improve access to high-value spine care in LMICs through appropriate patient selection, efficient perioperative care, and optimal use of limited resources. Future studies to validate this proposal are necessary.

资源有限环境下高质量脊柱外科的策略:公平手术交付的Five-P框架。
研究设计:概念框架下的叙述性回顾。低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)约占全球人口的80-85%,面临着不成比例的脊柱疾病负担,以及获得及时、安全和负担得起的外科护理的机会有限。本综述提出了一个实用的框架,通过将卫生系统、基于价值的医疗保健和脊柱外科的证据整合到五个战略领域:政策与治理、患者选择、围手术期效率、产品与技术以及保护(five - p框架),为中低收入国家提供高价值的脊柱护理。方法采用PubMed和灰色文献进行叙事回顾和结构化文献检索。在中低收入国家或类似环境中,对脊柱护理交付、卫生系统、成本效益和手术策略的研究定性地综合到专题领域。结果确定了五个领域:(1)政策和治理,包括集中护理、财政激励监管、反腐败措施和减少并发症;(2)患者选择,强调循证指征;(3)围手术期效率,包括增强恢复途径、门诊手术和标准化方案;(4)产品和技术,侧重于资源优化和适合环境的技术,包括本地制造的植入物;(5)保护,促进平衡的医学法律框架。总之,这些领域的目标是最大化价值,改善访问,减少不必要的程序和低效的资源利用。结论Five-P框架是一个理论模型,它提供了一个系统层面的策略,通过适当的患者选择、有效的围手术期护理和有限资源的优化利用,提高中低收入国家高价值脊柱护理的可及性。未来的研究验证这一建议是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书