A UK Delphi consensus study on the definition and management of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Future oncology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-17 DOI:10.1080/14796694.2026.2733721
Amarnath Challapalli, Amer Durrani, Grant Stewart, Heather Shaw, John Lear, Kate Fife, Kim Peate, Miranda Payne, Ricky Frazer, Jonathan Pollock
{"title":"A UK Delphi consensus study on the definition and management of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Amarnath Challapalli, Amer Durrani, Grant Stewart, Heather Shaw, John Lear, Kate Fife, Kim Peate, Miranda Payne, Ricky Frazer, Jonathan Pollock","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2026.2733721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (acSCC) encompasses locally advanced and metastatic disease; however, no standardized definition exists. Recognition and categorization, therefore, often rely on multidisciplinary judgment, which may lead to variations in diagnosis and management between centers. This study aimed to establish United Kingdom (UK) consensus on the definition and optimal management of acSCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi methodology was followed. Ten senior clinicians formed a steering group and identified four key topics for consensus statement development surrounding the challenges of acSCC, disease definition, assessment, and optimal management. Forty-two consensus statements were developed and distributed via an online survey to UK clinicians experienced in acSCC care. Agreement was rated on a 4-point Likert scale, with consensus predefined as ≥75% agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 responses were received from dermatologists, oncologists, surgeons, and clinical nurse specialists, among others. The consensus threshold was met for 39 of 42 statements (93%). A consensus definition, eight best-practice recommendations, and a treatment algorithm were developed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides a UK-derived definition of acSCC, addressing the current lack of agreed terminology. The study outputs may help standardize disease classification, reduce practice variation, and support more consistent management of acSCC across UK services.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2693-2708"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2026.2733721","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (acSCC) encompasses locally advanced and metastatic disease; however, no standardized definition exists. Recognition and categorization, therefore, often rely on multidisciplinary judgment, which may lead to variations in diagnosis and management between centers. This study aimed to establish United Kingdom (UK) consensus on the definition and optimal management of acSCC.

Methods: A modified Delphi methodology was followed. Ten senior clinicians formed a steering group and identified four key topics for consensus statement development surrounding the challenges of acSCC, disease definition, assessment, and optimal management. Forty-two consensus statements were developed and distributed via an online survey to UK clinicians experienced in acSCC care. Agreement was rated on a 4-point Likert scale, with consensus predefined as ≥75% agreement.

Results: A total of 130 responses were received from dermatologists, oncologists, surgeons, and clinical nurse specialists, among others. The consensus threshold was met for 39 of 42 statements (93%). A consensus definition, eight best-practice recommendations, and a treatment algorithm were developed.

Conclusion: This study provides a UK-derived definition of acSCC, addressing the current lack of agreed terminology. The study outputs may help standardize disease classification, reduce practice variation, and support more consistent management of acSCC across UK services.

英国德尔菲共识研究晚期皮肤鳞状细胞癌的定义和处理。
背景:晚期皮肤鳞状细胞癌(acSCC)包括局部晚期和转移性疾病;然而,没有标准化的定义。因此,识别和分类往往依赖于多学科的判断,这可能导致不同中心在诊断和管理方面的差异。本研究旨在建立英国(UK)对acSCC定义和最佳管理的共识。方法:采用改进的德尔菲法。10名资深临床医生组成了一个指导小组,并确定了围绕acSCC挑战、疾病定义、评估和最佳管理达成共识声明的四个关键主题。42份共识声明通过在线调查发布给有acSCC护理经验的英国临床医生。按照4分李克特量表对一致性进行评分,一致性预定义为≥75%。结果:共收到来自皮肤科医生、肿瘤科医生、外科医生和临床护理专家等的130份回复。42个声明中有39个达到了共识阈值(93%)。制定了共识定义、八项最佳实践建议和一种治疗算法。结论:本研究提供了一个英国衍生的acSCC定义,解决了目前缺乏商定术语的问题。研究结果可能有助于标准化疾病分类,减少实践差异,并支持在英国服务中更一致的acSCC管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Future oncology
Future oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
335
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community. The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书