Incidental findings on preoperative computed tomography for the planning of robotic arthroplasty: retrospective cohort study.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2026-09-04 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrag044
Robin J S Jones, Jonathan R A Phillips, Matthew J Wilson, Michalis Panteli
{"title":"Incidental findings on preoperative computed tomography for the planning of robotic arthroplasty: retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Robin J S Jones, Jonathan R A Phillips, Matthew J Wilson, Michalis Panteli","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrag044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of robotically assisted arthroplasty has increased substantially in recent years. Some robotic platforms require preoperative computed tomography for surgical planning. These scans frequently include anatomical regions beyond the primary operative field, creating potential for incidental findings. Planning computed tomography is not formally reported routinely, raising the possibility that clinically relevant incidental findings may be overlooked.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The reports of all computed tomography performed for preoperative planning of robotically assisted arthroplasty at the authors' institution between October 2019 and February 2024 were reviewed retrospectively. Incidental findings were noted, and their clinical significance assessed. The notes of patients with significant findings were reviewed to ascertain the final diagnosis and management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1602 patients (mean age 66.8 years, median 68 (range 16-98) years; 847 women) were identified within the study period. Some 447 patients (27.9%) demonstrated incidental findings, 136 (8.5%) of which were significant, requiring further investigation or management. Eighty-six significant findings (5.4%) were suspicious for malignancy and, of these, five (0.3%) resulted in a new cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, the rate of significant incidental findings was 8.5% and the risk of discovery of previously undiagnosed malignancy was 0.3%. A new significant finding was demonstrated in 1 in every 12 patients, and a new cancer diagnosis in 1 in every 320 patients. Planning imaging for robotic arthroplasty should be reported by a radiologist to prevent significant findings and malignancy being missed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13586754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrag044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of robotically assisted arthroplasty has increased substantially in recent years. Some robotic platforms require preoperative computed tomography for surgical planning. These scans frequently include anatomical regions beyond the primary operative field, creating potential for incidental findings. Planning computed tomography is not formally reported routinely, raising the possibility that clinically relevant incidental findings may be overlooked.

Methods: The reports of all computed tomography performed for preoperative planning of robotically assisted arthroplasty at the authors' institution between October 2019 and February 2024 were reviewed retrospectively. Incidental findings were noted, and their clinical significance assessed. The notes of patients with significant findings were reviewed to ascertain the final diagnosis and management.

Results: A total of 1602 patients (mean age 66.8 years, median 68 (range 16-98) years; 847 women) were identified within the study period. Some 447 patients (27.9%) demonstrated incidental findings, 136 (8.5%) of which were significant, requiring further investigation or management. Eighty-six significant findings (5.4%) were suspicious for malignancy and, of these, five (0.3%) resulted in a new cancer diagnosis.

Conclusion: In this study, the rate of significant incidental findings was 8.5% and the risk of discovery of previously undiagnosed malignancy was 0.3%. A new significant finding was demonstrated in 1 in every 12 patients, and a new cancer diagnosis in 1 in every 320 patients. Planning imaging for robotic arthroplasty should be reported by a radiologist to prevent significant findings and malignancy being missed.

机器人关节置换术术前计算机断层扫描的偶然发现:回顾性队列研究。
背景:近年来,机器人辅助关节置换术的使用大幅增加。一些机器人平台需要术前计算机断层扫描来制定手术计划。这些扫描通常包括主要手术野以外的解剖区域,从而产生偶然发现的可能性。计划计算机断层扫描没有正式的常规报告,增加了临床相关的偶然发现可能被忽视的可能性。方法:回顾性分析作者所在机构2019年10月至2024年2月期间所有用于机器人辅助关节置换术术前计划的计算机断层扫描报告。注意偶然发现,并评估其临床意义。回顾有重要发现的患者的记录,以确定最终的诊断和处理。结果:共1602例患者,平均年龄66.8岁,中位68岁(范围16-98);847名女性)在研究期间被确定。447例(27.9%)患者表现为偶然发现,其中136例(8.5%)显著,需要进一步调查或处理。86例(5.4%)可疑为恶性肿瘤,其中5例(0.3%)导致新的癌症诊断。结论:在本研究中,重大意外发现的发生率为8.5%,发现以前未诊断的恶性肿瘤的风险为0.3%。每12名患者中就有1人出现新的重大发现,每320名患者中就有1人出现新的癌症诊断。计划成像的机器人关节置换术应报告放射科医生,以防止重大发现和恶性肿瘤被遗漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书