Monitoring disease activity in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a scoping review.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Michelangelo Tesi, Ilaria Fibbi, Carlotta Rella, Alessandra Bettiol, Rosaria Talarico, Giacomo Emmi, Augusto Vaglio
{"title":"Monitoring disease activity in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a scoping review.","authors":"Michelangelo Tesi, Ilaria Fibbi, Carlotta Rella, Alessandra Bettiol, Rosaria Talarico, Giacomo Emmi, Augusto Vaglio","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/kysrv8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare vasculitis characterised by eosinophilic inflammation, asthma, and often anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) positivity. Monitoring disease activity is challenging because conventional tools, mainly the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS), account for manifestations not relevant to EGPA while insufficiently capturing respiratory and eosinophilic features.This scoping review aims to systematically evaluate current methods, biomarkers, imaging studies or other procedures to monitor disease activity or treatment response in EGPA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible studies were those published between January 2005 and March 2025, including at least five EGPA patients (≥10% of the cohort), and focusing on disease activity or treatment response. Non-human studies, case reports, reviews, and investigations focused on diagnosis were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 874 records screened, 58 studies met inclusion criteria. Clinical studies frequently adopted MIRRA trial definitions of remission (BVAS=0, prednisone ≤4 mg/day), but criteria varied across studies, with the most adopted secondary endpoints being oral glucocorticoid sparing, changes in eosinophil count and in pulmonary function. Biomarker investigations explored conventional lab parameters as well as emerging molecular candidates, but none achieved consistent reliability in distinguishing active from inactive disease. Imaging and procedures such as pulmonary function tests, high-resolution CT, FeNO, echocardiography, and cardiac MRI showed promise but lacked validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No robust tool currently exists for EGPA monitoring, even though interesting biomarkers and imaging techniques warrant further validation. Future research should prioritise harmonising definitions of remission and relapse, distinguishing systemic from organ-specific activity, and integrate clinical, biomarker, and imaging approaches to develop EGPAspecific monitoring strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/kysrv8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare vasculitis characterised by eosinophilic inflammation, asthma, and often anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) positivity. Monitoring disease activity is challenging because conventional tools, mainly the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS), account for manifestations not relevant to EGPA while insufficiently capturing respiratory and eosinophilic features.This scoping review aims to systematically evaluate current methods, biomarkers, imaging studies or other procedures to monitor disease activity or treatment response in EGPA.

Methods: Eligible studies were those published between January 2005 and March 2025, including at least five EGPA patients (≥10% of the cohort), and focusing on disease activity or treatment response. Non-human studies, case reports, reviews, and investigations focused on diagnosis were excluded.

Results: Of 874 records screened, 58 studies met inclusion criteria. Clinical studies frequently adopted MIRRA trial definitions of remission (BVAS=0, prednisone ≤4 mg/day), but criteria varied across studies, with the most adopted secondary endpoints being oral glucocorticoid sparing, changes in eosinophil count and in pulmonary function. Biomarker investigations explored conventional lab parameters as well as emerging molecular candidates, but none achieved consistent reliability in distinguishing active from inactive disease. Imaging and procedures such as pulmonary function tests, high-resolution CT, FeNO, echocardiography, and cardiac MRI showed promise but lacked validation.

Conclusions: No robust tool currently exists for EGPA monitoring, even though interesting biomarkers and imaging techniques warrant further validation. Future research should prioritise harmonising definitions of remission and relapse, distinguishing systemic from organ-specific activity, and integrate clinical, biomarker, and imaging approaches to develop EGPAspecific monitoring strategies.

监测嗜酸性肉芽肿病伴多血管炎的疾病活动性:范围综述。
目的:嗜酸性肉芽肿病合并多血管炎(EGPA)是一种罕见的血管炎,以嗜酸性炎症、哮喘和抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)阳性为特征。监测疾病活动性具有挑战性,因为传统的工具,主要是伯明翰血管炎活动性评分(BVAS),不能解释与EGPA无关的表现,同时不能充分捕捉呼吸和嗜酸性粒细胞的特征。本综述旨在系统评价目前用于监测EGPA疾病活动性或治疗反应的方法、生物标志物、影像学研究或其他程序。方法:符合条件的研究是在2005年1月至2025年3月期间发表的,包括至少5例EGPA患者(≥10%的队列),并关注疾病活动性或治疗反应。排除了非人类研究、病例报告、综述和以诊断为重点的调查。结果:在筛选的874项记录中,58项研究符合纳入标准。临床研究经常采用MIRRA试验对缓解的定义(BVAS=0,强的松≤4mg /天),但不同研究的标准不同,最常用的次要终点是口服糖皮质激素保留、嗜酸性粒细胞计数和肺功能的变化。生物标志物研究探索了传统的实验室参数以及新兴的分子候选物,但在区分活动性和非活动性疾病方面没有取得一致的可靠性。成像和程序,如肺功能检查、高分辨率CT、FeNO、超声心动图和心脏MRI显示了希望,但缺乏验证。结论:目前没有可靠的EGPA监测工具,尽管有趣的生物标志物和成像技术值得进一步验证。未来的研究应优先协调缓解和复发的定义,区分系统性和器官特异性活性,并整合临床、生物标志物和成像方法来制定egpasspecific监测策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书