Reasons for Not Having Sex and Differences in Contraceptive Knowledge Among Sexually Active and Inactive College Students.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Allison R Casola, Natalie Khan, Olivia Rea, Pamela A Matson, Resa M Jones
{"title":"Reasons for Not Having Sex and Differences in Contraceptive Knowledge Among Sexually Active and Inactive College Students.","authors":"Allison R Casola, Natalie Khan, Olivia Rea, Pamela A Matson, Resa M Jones","doi":"10.1177/08901171261486287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo examine reasons for not having sex and contraceptive knowledge disparities by sexual activity status among college students aged 18-24.DesignA cross-sectional survey assessing sexual activity status, reasons for not having sex, and contraceptive knowledge was conducted.SettingLarge urban university.SampleThe study included 700 college students (sexually active: n = 443; inactive: n = 76; never had sex: n = 181).MeasuresSexual activity status was self-reported, and contraceptive knowledge were measured using the Contraception Knowledge Assessment (score range: 0-25). Demographics included sex, race, education year, sexual orientation, and age.AnalysisDescriptive statistics and adjusted linear regression models were used to compare mean contraceptive knowledge scores between groups, controlling for demographic factors.ResultsAmong students, 26% never had sex, were primarily female (86%) and white (54%), and citied \"not finding the right person\" (65%) and religious or moral reasons (12%) as top reasons for not having sex. In adjusted analyses, sexually active students had higher contraceptive knowledge scores than peers who never had sex (14.3 vs 12.5).ConclusionStudents who never had sex had lower contraceptive knowledge, suggesting a need for informational sex preparedness. All students, regardless of activity status, need comprehensive sexual education to support informed decisions and safe sex practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171261486287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171261486287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeTo examine reasons for not having sex and contraceptive knowledge disparities by sexual activity status among college students aged 18-24.DesignA cross-sectional survey assessing sexual activity status, reasons for not having sex, and contraceptive knowledge was conducted.SettingLarge urban university.SampleThe study included 700 college students (sexually active: n = 443; inactive: n = 76; never had sex: n = 181).MeasuresSexual activity status was self-reported, and contraceptive knowledge were measured using the Contraception Knowledge Assessment (score range: 0-25). Demographics included sex, race, education year, sexual orientation, and age.AnalysisDescriptive statistics and adjusted linear regression models were used to compare mean contraceptive knowledge scores between groups, controlling for demographic factors.ResultsAmong students, 26% never had sex, were primarily female (86%) and white (54%), and citied "not finding the right person" (65%) and religious or moral reasons (12%) as top reasons for not having sex. In adjusted analyses, sexually active students had higher contraceptive knowledge scores than peers who never had sex (14.3 vs 12.5).ConclusionStudents who never had sex had lower contraceptive knowledge, suggesting a need for informational sex preparedness. All students, regardless of activity status, need comprehensive sexual education to support informed decisions and safe sex practices.

性活跃与性不活跃大学生不性生活的原因及避孕知识的差异
目的调查18 ~ 24岁大学生不性生活的原因及性行为状况与避孕知识的差异。设计进行了一项横断面调查,评估性活动状况、不发生性行为的原因和避孕知识。大型城市大学。研究对象包括700名大学生(性活跃的443名;性不活跃的76名;从未有过性行为的181名)。测量方法:性活动状况自我报告,避孕知识采用避孕知识评估(评分范围:0-25)进行测量。人口统计包括性别、种族、受教育年限、性取向和年龄。在控制人口统计学因素的情况下,采用描述性统计和调整后的线性回归模型比较各组间平均避孕知识得分。结果26%的学生从未发生过性行为,主要是女性(86%)和白人(54%),“找不到合适的人”(65%)和宗教或道德原因(12%)是没有发生性行为的主要原因。在调整后的分析中,性活跃的学生比没有性行为的同龄人有更高的避孕知识得分(14.3比12.5)。结论未发生过性行为的学生对避孕知识的了解程度较低,提示有必要开展性知识准备工作。所有学生,无论其活动状况如何,都需要全面的性教育,以支持明智的决定和安全的性行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书