Personalised fluid therapy in septic shock.

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Annals of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2026-08-26 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100142
Antonio Messina, Andrea Brunati, Maurizio Cecconi
{"title":"Personalised fluid therapy in septic shock.","authors":"Antonio Messina, Andrea Brunati, Maurizio Cecconi","doi":"10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fluid management remains a cornerstone of early septic shock resuscitation; an accumulating body of evidence highlights the substantial risks associated with excessive fluid administration. Fluid overload is consistently associated to organ dysfunction and adverse outcomes, underscoring the need for a personalized approach to intravenous fluid therapy. Over the past decade, research has progressively refined the concepts of fluid responsiveness and the fluid challenge, moving from fixed-volume boluses guided by static measures to individualized, dynamic assessments supported by multimodal monitoring. Recent, large multicenter trials demonstrated that CRT-guided strategies reduce fluid administration, accelerate recovery, and decrease the duration of organ support, despite not significantly affecting mortality. The 2025 European society of intensive medicine Shock Consensus reflects these advances recommending dynamic tests (<i>i.e.</i> mainly passive leg raising and end-expiratory occlusion) for predicting fluid responsiveness, while discouraging reliance on static preload indices and isolated inferior vena cava measurements. The guidelines also emphasize the growing role of mini-fluid challenges, microcirculatory evaluation, and integration of metabolic markers to ensure that increased cardiac output translates into improved tissue perfusion. Personalizing therapy across the four phases of shock (resuscitation, optimization, stabilization, and evacuation) forms the foundation of fluid stewardship. Central to this concept is the optimization phase, where determining the need for continuous monitoring and identifying fluid responsiveness prevent unnecessary fluid administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"16 ","pages":"100142"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13578956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100142","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fluid management remains a cornerstone of early septic shock resuscitation; an accumulating body of evidence highlights the substantial risks associated with excessive fluid administration. Fluid overload is consistently associated to organ dysfunction and adverse outcomes, underscoring the need for a personalized approach to intravenous fluid therapy. Over the past decade, research has progressively refined the concepts of fluid responsiveness and the fluid challenge, moving from fixed-volume boluses guided by static measures to individualized, dynamic assessments supported by multimodal monitoring. Recent, large multicenter trials demonstrated that CRT-guided strategies reduce fluid administration, accelerate recovery, and decrease the duration of organ support, despite not significantly affecting mortality. The 2025 European society of intensive medicine Shock Consensus reflects these advances recommending dynamic tests (i.e. mainly passive leg raising and end-expiratory occlusion) for predicting fluid responsiveness, while discouraging reliance on static preload indices and isolated inferior vena cava measurements. The guidelines also emphasize the growing role of mini-fluid challenges, microcirculatory evaluation, and integration of metabolic markers to ensure that increased cardiac output translates into improved tissue perfusion. Personalizing therapy across the four phases of shock (resuscitation, optimization, stabilization, and evacuation) forms the foundation of fluid stewardship. Central to this concept is the optimization phase, where determining the need for continuous monitoring and identifying fluid responsiveness prevent unnecessary fluid administration.

感染性休克个体化输液治疗
液体管理仍然是早期感染性休克复苏的基石;越来越多的证据强调了与过量输液相关的重大风险。液体超载一直与器官功能障碍和不良后果相关,强调需要个性化的静脉输液治疗方法。在过去的十年中,研究逐渐完善了流体响应性和流体挑战的概念,从静态测量指导的固定体积大剂量转向由多模态监测支持的个性化动态评估。最近,大型多中心试验表明,尽管对死亡率没有显著影响,但ct引导的策略减少了液体给药,加速了恢复,缩短了器官支持的持续时间。2025年欧洲强化医学休克学会共识反映了这些进展,建议动态测试(即主要是被动抬腿和呼气末闭塞)来预测液体反应,同时不鼓励依赖静态预负荷指数和孤立的下腔静脉测量。指南还强调了微流体挑战、微循环评估和代谢标志物整合的日益重要的作用,以确保心输出量的增加转化为组织灌注的改善。在休克的四个阶段(复苏、优化、稳定和疏散)进行个性化治疗是液体管理的基础。该概念的核心是优化阶段,在此阶段确定持续监测和识别流体响应性的需求,以防止不必要的流体管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书