{"title":"Personalised fluid therapy in septic shock.","authors":"Antonio Messina, Andrea Brunati, Maurizio Cecconi","doi":"10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fluid management remains a cornerstone of early septic shock resuscitation; an accumulating body of evidence highlights the substantial risks associated with excessive fluid administration. Fluid overload is consistently associated to organ dysfunction and adverse outcomes, underscoring the need for a personalized approach to intravenous fluid therapy. Over the past decade, research has progressively refined the concepts of fluid responsiveness and the fluid challenge, moving from fixed-volume boluses guided by static measures to individualized, dynamic assessments supported by multimodal monitoring. Recent, large multicenter trials demonstrated that CRT-guided strategies reduce fluid administration, accelerate recovery, and decrease the duration of organ support, despite not significantly affecting mortality. The 2025 European society of intensive medicine Shock Consensus reflects these advances recommending dynamic tests (<i>i.e.</i> mainly passive leg raising and end-expiratory occlusion) for predicting fluid responsiveness, while discouraging reliance on static preload indices and isolated inferior vena cava measurements. The guidelines also emphasize the growing role of mini-fluid challenges, microcirculatory evaluation, and integration of metabolic markers to ensure that increased cardiac output translates into improved tissue perfusion. Personalizing therapy across the four phases of shock (resuscitation, optimization, stabilization, and evacuation) forms the foundation of fluid stewardship. Central to this concept is the optimization phase, where determining the need for continuous monitoring and identifying fluid responsiveness prevent unnecessary fluid administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"16 ","pages":"100142"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13578956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100142","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fluid management remains a cornerstone of early septic shock resuscitation; an accumulating body of evidence highlights the substantial risks associated with excessive fluid administration. Fluid overload is consistently associated to organ dysfunction and adverse outcomes, underscoring the need for a personalized approach to intravenous fluid therapy. Over the past decade, research has progressively refined the concepts of fluid responsiveness and the fluid challenge, moving from fixed-volume boluses guided by static measures to individualized, dynamic assessments supported by multimodal monitoring. Recent, large multicenter trials demonstrated that CRT-guided strategies reduce fluid administration, accelerate recovery, and decrease the duration of organ support, despite not significantly affecting mortality. The 2025 European society of intensive medicine Shock Consensus reflects these advances recommending dynamic tests (i.e. mainly passive leg raising and end-expiratory occlusion) for predicting fluid responsiveness, while discouraging reliance on static preload indices and isolated inferior vena cava measurements. The guidelines also emphasize the growing role of mini-fluid challenges, microcirculatory evaluation, and integration of metabolic markers to ensure that increased cardiac output translates into improved tissue perfusion. Personalizing therapy across the four phases of shock (resuscitation, optimization, stabilization, and evacuation) forms the foundation of fluid stewardship. Central to this concept is the optimization phase, where determining the need for continuous monitoring and identifying fluid responsiveness prevent unnecessary fluid administration.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.