Enhancing reproducibility in hybrid Earth system models

IF 29.8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Min Chen, Zhiyi Zhu, Thorsten Wagener, Niklas Boers, R. Dietmar Müller, Josef Strobl, Gustau Camps-Valls, Michael Batty, Anthony J. Jakeman, Olaf Kolditz, Stefano Nativi, Maria Antonia Brovelli, Felix Creutzig, Pankaj Kumar, Paul Whitehead, C. Michael Barton, Dichen Liu, Peilong Ma, Zaiyang Ma, Fengyuan Zhang, Bo Zhang, Peng Hou, Guonian Lü
{"title":"Enhancing reproducibility in hybrid Earth system models","authors":"Min Chen, Zhiyi Zhu, Thorsten Wagener, Niklas Boers, R. Dietmar Müller, Josef Strobl, Gustau Camps-Valls, Michael Batty, Anthony J. Jakeman, Olaf Kolditz, Stefano Nativi, Maria Antonia Brovelli, Felix Creutzig, Pankaj Kumar, Paul Whitehead, C. Michael Barton, Dichen Liu, Peilong Ma, Zaiyang Ma, Fengyuan Zhang, Bo Zhang, Peng Hou, Guonian Lü","doi":"10.1038/s42256-026-01299-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The integration of artificial intelligence into Earth system models (ESMs) has revolutionized the simulation and prediction of complex environmental dynamics. However, this shift introduces substantial challenges for reproducibility, a cornerstone of scientific progress. In particular, artificial intelligence-infused hybrid ESMs face amplified issues of numerical instability, procedural opacity and asymmetric access to computational resources. If left unaddressed, these challenges risk turning hybrid ESMs into opaque and weakly verifiable systems, reducing model traceability, weakening cumulative knowledge building and narrowing the evidential basis for climate risk assessment and policy guidance. This Perspective argues that reproducibility should be reframed to reflect the epistemological and operational realities of hybrid ESMs. We propose an integrated roadmap that couples a theory of reproducibility assessment with practical pathways for implementation in modelling practices. Within this context, we introduce Reproducibility in hybrid Earth system models (RHEM) as a reference guideline for governing transparent, trustworthy, and reproducible hybrid ESMs. Building on this foundation, the pathways operationalize the framework’s criteria into actionable measures that embed transparency and trustworthiness in the modelling process itself. By linking conceptual structure with operational guidance, reproducibility is repositioned from a post hoc requirement to a structural property of hybrid ESMs and established as a foundational principle for Earth system science in the artificial intelligence era. AI integration in Earth system models enhances prediction and modelling capabilities but also amplifies challenges for reproducibility. This Perspective introduces a framework for assessing reproducibility and provides practical ways to strengthen reproducibility in hybrid Earth system models.","PeriodicalId":48533,"journal":{"name":"Nature Machine Intelligence","volume":"8 9","pages":"1358-1370"},"PeriodicalIF":29.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Machine Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-026-01299-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence into Earth system models (ESMs) has revolutionized the simulation and prediction of complex environmental dynamics. However, this shift introduces substantial challenges for reproducibility, a cornerstone of scientific progress. In particular, artificial intelligence-infused hybrid ESMs face amplified issues of numerical instability, procedural opacity and asymmetric access to computational resources. If left unaddressed, these challenges risk turning hybrid ESMs into opaque and weakly verifiable systems, reducing model traceability, weakening cumulative knowledge building and narrowing the evidential basis for climate risk assessment and policy guidance. This Perspective argues that reproducibility should be reframed to reflect the epistemological and operational realities of hybrid ESMs. We propose an integrated roadmap that couples a theory of reproducibility assessment with practical pathways for implementation in modelling practices. Within this context, we introduce Reproducibility in hybrid Earth system models (RHEM) as a reference guideline for governing transparent, trustworthy, and reproducible hybrid ESMs. Building on this foundation, the pathways operationalize the framework’s criteria into actionable measures that embed transparency and trustworthiness in the modelling process itself. By linking conceptual structure with operational guidance, reproducibility is repositioned from a post hoc requirement to a structural property of hybrid ESMs and established as a foundational principle for Earth system science in the artificial intelligence era. AI integration in Earth system models enhances prediction and modelling capabilities but also amplifies challenges for reproducibility. This Perspective introduces a framework for assessing reproducibility and provides practical ways to strengthen reproducibility in hybrid Earth system models.
提高混合地球系统模型的可重复性
人工智能与地球系统模型(ESMs)的集成已经彻底改变了复杂环境动力学的模拟和预测。然而,这种转变给可重复性带来了重大挑战,而可重复性是科学进步的基石。特别是,注入人工智能的混合esm面临着数值不稳定、程序不透明和计算资源获取不对称等放大问题。如果不加以解决,这些挑战可能会使混合型环境监测机制变成不透明且难以验证的系统,降低模型可追溯性,削弱累积知识建设,缩小气候风险评估和政策指导的证据基础。这一观点认为,再现性应该重新定义,以反映混合型esm的认识论和操作现实。我们提出了一个集成的路线图,将再现性评估理论与建模实践中实施的实际途径结合起来。在此背景下,我们介绍了混合地球系统模型(RHEM)中的可再现性,作为管理透明、可信和可再现的混合esm的参考指南。在此基础上,这些途径将框架的标准转化为可操作的措施,将透明度和可信度嵌入建模过程本身。通过将概念结构与操作指导联系起来,可重复性从事后要求重新定位为混合esm的结构特性,并成为人工智能时代地球系统科学的基本原则。人工智能在地球系统模型中的集成增强了预测和建模能力,但也加大了可重复性的挑战。本展望介绍了一个评估可重复性的框架,并提供了加强混合地球系统模型可重复性的实用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
36.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Nature Machine Intelligence is a distinguished publication that presents original research and reviews on various topics in machine learning, robotics, and AI. Our focus extends beyond these fields, exploring their profound impact on other scientific disciplines, as well as societal and industrial aspects. We recognize limitless possibilities wherein machine intelligence can augment human capabilities and knowledge in domains like scientific exploration, healthcare, medical diagnostics, and the creation of safe and sustainable cities, transportation, and agriculture. Simultaneously, we acknowledge the emergence of ethical, social, and legal concerns due to the rapid pace of advancements. To foster interdisciplinary discussions on these far-reaching implications, Nature Machine Intelligence serves as a platform for dialogue facilitated through Comments, News Features, News & Views articles, and Correspondence. Our goal is to encourage a comprehensive examination of these subjects. Similar to all Nature-branded journals, Nature Machine Intelligence operates under the guidance of a team of skilled editors. We adhere to a fair and rigorous peer-review process, ensuring high standards of copy-editing and production, swift publication, and editorial independence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书