Evaluation methods and metrics towards trustworthy AI

Catharina Margaretha van Leersum, Clara Maathuis
{"title":"Evaluation methods and metrics towards trustworthy AI","authors":"Catharina Margaretha van Leersum,&nbsp;Clara Maathuis","doi":"10.1007/s43681-026-01349-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ongoing developments in Artificial Intelligence (AI) are introducing new technologies, initiatives, and applications. To assure that these developments do not translate into potential risks that are not captured, understood, measured, and managed, a trustworthiness approach is necessary. AI trustworthiness is treated as a multidimensional construct that spans transparency, safety, security, privacy, robustness, and fairness. We argue that these properties they should be translated into explicit, testable criteria. This article aims to synthesize evaluation approaches that make AI trustworthiness observable and measurable, enabling stakeholders to identify gaps, prioritize improvements, and align system behaviour with ethical, social, and legal values. A scoping review (resulting in 27 papers) is augmented with knowledge of 6 experts to map (i) the main trustworthy AI aspects, (ii) the evaluation methods used to assess these aspects, (iii) the metrics applied within them, and (iv) recommendations proposed to strengthen trustworthiness. The results suggest that current evaluation practices interpret and operationalize trustworthy AI in diverse ways. They often rely on established methods or benchmarks that may imply bias, limited comparability, or provide limited insight into the reasoning quality. We recommend to design evaluation frameworks that explicitly target trustworthiness aspects from a multidisciplinary angle and being instantiated to specific contexts or problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-026-01349-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-026-01349-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ongoing developments in Artificial Intelligence (AI) are introducing new technologies, initiatives, and applications. To assure that these developments do not translate into potential risks that are not captured, understood, measured, and managed, a trustworthiness approach is necessary. AI trustworthiness is treated as a multidimensional construct that spans transparency, safety, security, privacy, robustness, and fairness. We argue that these properties they should be translated into explicit, testable criteria. This article aims to synthesize evaluation approaches that make AI trustworthiness observable and measurable, enabling stakeholders to identify gaps, prioritize improvements, and align system behaviour with ethical, social, and legal values. A scoping review (resulting in 27 papers) is augmented with knowledge of 6 experts to map (i) the main trustworthy AI aspects, (ii) the evaluation methods used to assess these aspects, (iii) the metrics applied within them, and (iv) recommendations proposed to strengthen trustworthiness. The results suggest that current evaluation practices interpret and operationalize trustworthy AI in diverse ways. They often rely on established methods or benchmarks that may imply bias, limited comparability, or provide limited insight into the reasoning quality. We recommend to design evaluation frameworks that explicitly target trustworthiness aspects from a multidisciplinary angle and being instantiated to specific contexts or problems.

可信赖人工智能的评估方法和指标
人工智能(AI)的持续发展正在引入新的技术、举措和应用。为了确保这些发展不会转化为未被捕获、理解、测量和管理的潜在风险,一种可信赖的方法是必要的。人工智能的可信度被视为一个多维结构,涵盖透明度、安全性、安全性、隐私性、稳健性和公平性。我们认为这些属性应该转化为明确的、可测试的标准。本文旨在综合评估方法,使人工智能的可信度可观察和可测量,使利益相关者能够识别差距,优先考虑改进,并将系统行为与道德,社会和法律价值观结合起来。通过6位专家的知识,对范围审查(产生27篇论文)进行了扩充,以绘制(i)主要可信赖的人工智能方面,(ii)用于评估这些方面的评估方法,(iii)其中应用的指标,以及(iv)为加强可信度而提出的建议。结果表明,目前的评估实践以不同的方式解释和操作可信赖的人工智能。它们通常依赖于已建立的方法或基准,这可能意味着偏见、有限的可比性,或者对推理质量提供有限的见解。我们建议从多学科角度设计明确针对可信度方面的评估框架,并将其实例化到具体的环境或问题中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书