Dorota Kulikowska, Magdalena Zaborowska, Mariusz Gusiatin, Katarzyna Bernat
{"title":"Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in wastewater and sewage sludge: occurrence, concentrations, and regulatory challenges","authors":"Dorota Kulikowska, Magdalena Zaborowska, Mariusz Gusiatin, Katarzyna Bernat","doi":"10.1186/s12302-026-01451-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This review examines the role of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) as important pathways for the release of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) into the environment. WWTPs receive municipal, industrial, and other wastewater, including landfill leachate, and subsequently discharge treated effluent and sewage sludge, which may act as secondary sources of PFAS. The literature indicates that, although conventional treatment and sludge management processes can partially remove some micropollutants, many persistent and potentially hazardous PFAS remain in treated wastewater and accumulate in sewage sludge. This review also highlights that the lack of comprehensive and harmonized data on PFAS occurrence, transformation, and fate in these matrices limits reliable risk assessment and effective environmental management. In addition, current European Union legislation regulating hazardous substances in WWTP effluent and sewage sludge does not establish specific concentration limits for PFAS. Existing regulations are often limited to individual PFAS classes or specific countries, or take the form of recommendations rather than legally binding standards. Based on the available literature, PFAS occurrence and concentrations are highly variable and do not consistently depend on wastewater origin, including municipal, industrial, or landfill leachate. Reported WWTP influent concentrations differ widely across regions, ranging from 22 to 346.2 ng L<sup>–1</sup>, and attempts to relate these variations to plant capacity, population equivalent, or industrial activity remain inconclusive. The studies reviewed herein indicate that temporal variability is common, but consistent seasonal trends are rare. Moreover, PFAS concentrations in the WWTP effluent are not always lower than in the influent, often due to transformation of precursor compounds during treatment processes. Reported effluent concentrations ranged from 13.4 to 1357 ng L<sup>−1</sup>, with the highest values observed in industrially impacted WWTPs. This review further highlights a significant geographical imbalance in available data: although numerous studies have been conducted worldwide, information from Central and Eastern Europe remains limited. In Poland, in particular, the few available studies have mainly focused on PFAS in surface water and drinking water, whereas systematic studies of PFAS in municipal or industrial wastewater and sewage sludge are still largely absent. Nevertheless, the PFAS concentrations reported in municipal sewage sludge in the manuscript range from 3.7 even to 1124 ng g<sup>−1</sup> dw, whereas in sewage sludge/biosolids after treatment of industrial wastewater they range from a few to several hundred ng g<sup>−1</sup> dw.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-026-01451-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-026-01451-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This review examines the role of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) as important pathways for the release of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) into the environment. WWTPs receive municipal, industrial, and other wastewater, including landfill leachate, and subsequently discharge treated effluent and sewage sludge, which may act as secondary sources of PFAS. The literature indicates that, although conventional treatment and sludge management processes can partially remove some micropollutants, many persistent and potentially hazardous PFAS remain in treated wastewater and accumulate in sewage sludge. This review also highlights that the lack of comprehensive and harmonized data on PFAS occurrence, transformation, and fate in these matrices limits reliable risk assessment and effective environmental management. In addition, current European Union legislation regulating hazardous substances in WWTP effluent and sewage sludge does not establish specific concentration limits for PFAS. Existing regulations are often limited to individual PFAS classes or specific countries, or take the form of recommendations rather than legally binding standards. Based on the available literature, PFAS occurrence and concentrations are highly variable and do not consistently depend on wastewater origin, including municipal, industrial, or landfill leachate. Reported WWTP influent concentrations differ widely across regions, ranging from 22 to 346.2 ng L–1, and attempts to relate these variations to plant capacity, population equivalent, or industrial activity remain inconclusive. The studies reviewed herein indicate that temporal variability is common, but consistent seasonal trends are rare. Moreover, PFAS concentrations in the WWTP effluent are not always lower than in the influent, often due to transformation of precursor compounds during treatment processes. Reported effluent concentrations ranged from 13.4 to 1357 ng L−1, with the highest values observed in industrially impacted WWTPs. This review further highlights a significant geographical imbalance in available data: although numerous studies have been conducted worldwide, information from Central and Eastern Europe remains limited. In Poland, in particular, the few available studies have mainly focused on PFAS in surface water and drinking water, whereas systematic studies of PFAS in municipal or industrial wastewater and sewage sludge are still largely absent. Nevertheless, the PFAS concentrations reported in municipal sewage sludge in the manuscript range from 3.7 even to 1124 ng g−1 dw, whereas in sewage sludge/biosolids after treatment of industrial wastewater they range from a few to several hundred ng g−1 dw.
本文综述了污水处理厂作为全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)释放到环境中的重要途径的作用。污水处理厂接收城市、工业和其他废水,包括垃圾填埋场渗滤液,随后排放处理过的废水和污水污泥,这些废水和污泥可能是PFAS的二级来源。文献表明,尽管常规处理和污泥管理工艺可以部分去除一些微污染物,但许多持久性和潜在危险的PFAS仍留在处理过的废水中,并在污水污泥中积累。这篇综述还强调,在这些矩阵中缺乏关于PFAS发生、转化和命运的全面和统一的数据,限制了可靠的风险评估和有效的环境管理。此外,目前欧洲联盟管制污水处理厂流出物和污泥中有害物质的立法并没有规定PFAS的具体浓度限制。现有法规通常仅限于个别PFAS类别或特定国家,或者采取建议的形式,而不是具有法律约束力的标准。根据现有文献,PFAS的发生和浓度变化很大,并不总是取决于废水来源,包括市政、工业或垃圾填埋场渗滤液。报告的污水处理厂进水浓度在不同地区差异很大,范围从22至346.2纳克·L-1,并且试图将这些变化与植物容量、人口当量或工业活动联系起来仍然没有定论。本文综述的研究表明,时间变率是常见的,但一致的季节趋势是罕见的。此外,污水处理厂出水中的PFAS浓度并不总是低于进水中的浓度,这通常是由于处理过程中前体化合物的转化。报告的污水浓度范围为13.4至1357 ng L - 1,在受工业影响的污水处理厂中观察到的最高值。这次审查进一步强调了现有数据的严重地域不平衡:虽然在世界范围内进行了许多研究,但来自中欧和东欧的资料仍然有限。特别是在波兰,现有的少数研究主要集中在地表水和饮用水中的全氟辛烷磺酸,而对城市或工业废水和污水污泥中的全氟辛烷磺酸的系统研究仍然基本上缺乏。然而,手稿中报道的城市污水污泥中PFAS浓度范围从3.7到1124 ng g - 1 dw,而在工业废水处理后的污水污泥/生物固体中,它们的范围从几到几百ng g - 1 dw。
期刊介绍:
ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation.
ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation.
ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation.
Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues.
Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.