Exploratory ecological-stress screening for regional planning: a quality-controlled Landsat-based mRSEI analysis of Sakarya Province, Türkiye (2000–2025)

IF 2.5 Q2 REMOTE SENSING
Mustafa Ergen
{"title":"Exploratory ecological-stress screening for regional planning: a quality-controlled Landsat-based mRSEI analysis of Sakarya Province, Türkiye (2000–2025)","authors":"Mustafa Ergen","doi":"10.1007/s12518-026-00789-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Regional averages can conceal localized ecological deterioration in rapidly transforming peri-urban landscapes. This study presents a quality-controlled remote-sensing workflow for screening ecological stress across Sakarya Province, Türkiye, using six benchmark-date Landsat composites (2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, 2020 and 2025). After raster alignment and quality control, the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) was excluded because the 2025 layer differed substantially in spatial resolution and value distribution from the preceding series. A modified Remote Sensing Ecological Index (mRSEI) was therefore constructed from pooled, commonly normalized NDVI, NDMI, inverse NDBI and NBR layers using one fixed-loading principal component model. The first component explained 93.75% of pooled variance. Mean mRSEI increased from 0.609 in 2010 to 0.688 in 2015 but declined to 0.595 in 2025; the sensor transition and six-date design prevent this pattern from being interpreted as an unambiguous ecological trajectory. Pixel-wise Sen slope and Mann-Kendall tests indicated significant positive, significant negative and non-significant mRSEI trends over 4.83%, 1.10% and 94.08% of the common valid area, respectively, before multiple-testing correction. No trend remained significant after Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate control. A conservative Exploratory Ecological Stress Synthesis (EESS) classified 97.67% of the valid area as Low, 1.54% as Moderate, 0.57% as High and 0.22% as Very High stress. Because no independent field, cadastral or land-cover validation was available, these classes are modelled screening outputs rather than validated vulnerability zones. They can guide subsequent stratified field sampling, high-resolution image interpretation and planning review, but should not be used directly as statutory zoning boundaries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46286,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geomatics","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12518-026-00789-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regional averages can conceal localized ecological deterioration in rapidly transforming peri-urban landscapes. This study presents a quality-controlled remote-sensing workflow for screening ecological stress across Sakarya Province, Türkiye, using six benchmark-date Landsat composites (2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, 2020 and 2025). After raster alignment and quality control, the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) was excluded because the 2025 layer differed substantially in spatial resolution and value distribution from the preceding series. A modified Remote Sensing Ecological Index (mRSEI) was therefore constructed from pooled, commonly normalized NDVI, NDMI, inverse NDBI and NBR layers using one fixed-loading principal component model. The first component explained 93.75% of pooled variance. Mean mRSEI increased from 0.609 in 2010 to 0.688 in 2015 but declined to 0.595 in 2025; the sensor transition and six-date design prevent this pattern from being interpreted as an unambiguous ecological trajectory. Pixel-wise Sen slope and Mann-Kendall tests indicated significant positive, significant negative and non-significant mRSEI trends over 4.83%, 1.10% and 94.08% of the common valid area, respectively, before multiple-testing correction. No trend remained significant after Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate control. A conservative Exploratory Ecological Stress Synthesis (EESS) classified 97.67% of the valid area as Low, 1.54% as Moderate, 0.57% as High and 0.22% as Very High stress. Because no independent field, cadastral or land-cover validation was available, these classes are modelled screening outputs rather than validated vulnerability zones. They can guide subsequent stratified field sampling, high-resolution image interpretation and planning review, but should not be used directly as statutory zoning boundaries.

区域规划的探索性生态压力筛选:基于landsat的质量控制mRSEI分析(2000-2025)
区域平均值可以掩盖快速变化的城市周边景观的局部生态恶化。本研究利用六个基准日期(2000年、2005年、2010年、2015年、2020年和2025年)的Landsat复合材料,提出了一种质量控制的遥感工作流程,用于筛选吉耶省萨卡里亚省的生态胁迫。由于2025层在空间分辨率和值分布上与之前的序列存在较大差异,因此在栅格调优和质量控制后,排除了增强植被指数(Enhanced Vegetation Index, EVI)。利用固定载荷主成分模型,将NDVI、NDMI、逆NDBI和NBR层集合在一起,共同归一化,构建了改进的遥感生态指数。第一个分量解释了93.75%的汇总方差。平均mRSEI从2010年的0.609上升到2015年的0.688,到2025年下降到0.595;传感器的过渡和六个日期的设计阻止这种模式被解释为一个明确的生态轨迹。在多重检验校正前,像素级Sen斜率和Mann-Kendall检验分别在4.83%、1.10%和94.08%的共同有效区域上显示显著正、显著负和非显著mRSEI趋势。在benjamin - hochberg错误发现率控制后,没有明显的趋势。保守的探索性生态应激综合(EESS)将97.67%的有效面积划分为低应激区,1.54%为中等应激区,0.57%为高应激区,0.22%为极高应激区。由于没有独立的油田、地籍或土地覆盖验证可用,这些类别是建模筛选输出,而不是验证脆弱区域。它们可以指导后续的分层实地采样、高分辨率图像解释和规划审查,但不应直接用作法定分区边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Geomatics
Applied Geomatics REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Applied Geomatics (AGMJ) is the official journal of SIFET the Italian Society of Photogrammetry and Topography and covers all aspects and information on scientific and technical advances in the geomatics sciences. The Journal publishes innovative contributions in geomatics applications ranging from the integration of instruments, methodologies and technologies and their use in the environmental sciences, engineering and other natural sciences. The areas of interest include many research fields such as: remote sensing, close range and videometric photogrammetry, image analysis, digital mapping, land and geographic information systems, geographic information science, integrated geodesy, spatial data analysis, heritage recording; network adjustment and numerical processes. Furthermore, Applied Geomatics is open to articles from all areas of deformation measurements and analysis, structural engineering, mechanical engineering and all trends in earth and planetary survey science and space technology. The Journal also contains notices of conferences and international workshops, industry news, and information on new products. It provides a useful forum for professional and academic scientists involved in geomatics science and technology. Information on Open Research Funding and Support may be found here: https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/institutional-agreements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书