Neurofeedback for functional neurological disorders: future directions for research and clinical practice.

IF 4.7
Daniela Di Basilio, Alexander J Casson, Anthony Jones
{"title":"Neurofeedback for functional neurological disorders: future directions for research and clinical practice.","authors":"Daniela Di Basilio, Alexander J Casson, Anthony Jones","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2024.0468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Functional neurological disorder (FND) is increasingly conceptualized as a disorder of network-level dysfunction involving altered salience processing, impaired motor intention-execution coupling and disrupted self-agency. Despite advances in multi-disciplinary rehabilitation, a proportion of individuals experience persistent or fluctuating symptoms, highlighting the need for mechanistically informed adjunctive interventions. Neurofeedback, a closed-loop technique enabling individuals to modulate neural activity in real time, offers a theoretically grounded approach to targeting dysfunctional circuits implicated in FND. This opinion article synthesizes current neuroscientific models of FND with evidence from neurofeedback research in motor, affective and pain-related conditions. We examine modality-target considerations (e.g. electroencephalography versus functional magnetic resonance imaging), learning mechanisms including operant and associative paradigms and the relevance of network-based interventions for heterogeneous FND phenotypes. Given the limited direct evidence in FND, we critically appraise methodological variability in existing neurofeedback applications and outline pragmatic steps towards greater standardization, including transparent reporting of neural targets, feedback modality, training dose and transfer assessment. We also discuss translational challenges, including integration within established physiotherapy frameworks, patient-centred personalization and digitally enabled delivery models. While empirical evidence remains preliminary, neurofeedback represents a biologically informed and potentially scalable intervention that warrants systematic investigation within multi-disciplinary FND care pathways. This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Digital healthcare for the management of functional neurological disorders'.</p>","PeriodicalId":520748,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences","volume":"381 1958","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13644786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2024.0468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Functional neurological disorder (FND) is increasingly conceptualized as a disorder of network-level dysfunction involving altered salience processing, impaired motor intention-execution coupling and disrupted self-agency. Despite advances in multi-disciplinary rehabilitation, a proportion of individuals experience persistent or fluctuating symptoms, highlighting the need for mechanistically informed adjunctive interventions. Neurofeedback, a closed-loop technique enabling individuals to modulate neural activity in real time, offers a theoretically grounded approach to targeting dysfunctional circuits implicated in FND. This opinion article synthesizes current neuroscientific models of FND with evidence from neurofeedback research in motor, affective and pain-related conditions. We examine modality-target considerations (e.g. electroencephalography versus functional magnetic resonance imaging), learning mechanisms including operant and associative paradigms and the relevance of network-based interventions for heterogeneous FND phenotypes. Given the limited direct evidence in FND, we critically appraise methodological variability in existing neurofeedback applications and outline pragmatic steps towards greater standardization, including transparent reporting of neural targets, feedback modality, training dose and transfer assessment. We also discuss translational challenges, including integration within established physiotherapy frameworks, patient-centred personalization and digitally enabled delivery models. While empirical evidence remains preliminary, neurofeedback represents a biologically informed and potentially scalable intervention that warrants systematic investigation within multi-disciplinary FND care pathways. This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Digital healthcare for the management of functional neurological disorders'.

功能性神经系统疾病的神经反馈:未来研究和临床实践方向。
功能性神经障碍(FND)被越来越多地定义为一种网络水平的功能障碍,包括显著性加工改变、运动意图-执行耦合受损和自我代理中断。尽管在多学科康复方面取得了进展,但仍有一部分人经历了持续或波动的症状,这突出表明需要机械知情的辅助干预措施。神经反馈是一种闭环技术,使个体能够实时调节神经活动,它提供了一种理论基础的方法来瞄准与FND有关的功能失调回路。这篇观点文章综合了目前FND的神经科学模型和来自运动、情感和疼痛相关疾病的神经反馈研究的证据。我们研究了模式-目标考虑(例如脑电图与功能磁共振成像),学习机制,包括操作和联想范式,以及基于网络的干预对异质FND表型的相关性。鉴于FND中有限的直接证据,我们批判性地评估了现有神经反馈应用的方法可变性,并概述了实现更大标准化的务实步骤,包括神经目标的透明报告、反馈模式、训练剂量和转移评估。我们还讨论了翻译方面的挑战,包括在已建立的物理治疗框架内的整合,以患者为中心的个性化和数字化交付模式。虽然经验证据仍然是初步的,但神经反馈代表了一种生物学上知情的、潜在的可扩展的干预措施,值得在多学科FND护理途径中进行系统研究。本文是讨论会议“功能性神经疾病管理的数字医疗保健”的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书