Margarida Pujol-Lopez, Mariona Regany-Closa, Eduard Guasch, Paz Garre, Mireia Niebla, Esther Carro, Rebeca Domingo, Ivo Roca-Luque, José M Tolosana, Lluís Mont
{"title":"Tailoring the Atrioventricular Interval During Left Bundle Branch Pacing: Playing With Fusion.","authors":"Margarida Pujol-Lopez, Mariona Regany-Closa, Eduard Guasch, Paz Garre, Mireia Niebla, Esther Carro, Rebeca Domingo, Ivo Roca-Luque, José M Tolosana, Lluís Mont","doi":"10.1111/pace.70413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimization of biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with fusion (fusion-optimized intervals method) has been shown to improve left ventricular remodeling. However, information on programming the atrioventricular (AV) interval during left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess with electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) the electrical benefit of optimization of the AV interval during LBBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Pilot study including patients who received LBBP with CRT indication, normal AV conduction, sinus rhythm, and left bundle branch block. ECGI was used to obtain non-invasive activation maps, ventricular activation times, and QRS widths during the optimization of the AV interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 patients who received LBBP were included. Median age was 62 years (57-74 years), 40% were women, 20% had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and baseline LVEF was 29% (23%-36%). The baseline median QRS duration was 178 ms (168-187 ms), with a left ventricular activation time (LVAT) of 99 ms (90-109 ms), a right ventricular activation time (RVAT) of 42 ms (34-71 ms), and a total ventricular activation time (TAT) of 111 ms (105-131 ms). A non-tailored AV programming showed a QRS measured from intrinsic deflection of 142 ms (137-149 ms); when a tailored AV was programmed, the median QRS decreased to 124 ms (116-130 ms). Ventricular activation times showed shortening with a tailored approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AV interval adjustment during left bundle branch pacing may result in better resynchronization.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Optimization of biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with fusion (fusion-optimized intervals method) has been shown to improve left ventricular remodeling. However, information on programming the atrioventricular (AV) interval during left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is scarce.
Objective: Assess with electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) the electrical benefit of optimization of the AV interval during LBBP.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Pilot study including patients who received LBBP with CRT indication, normal AV conduction, sinus rhythm, and left bundle branch block. ECGI was used to obtain non-invasive activation maps, ventricular activation times, and QRS widths during the optimization of the AV interval.
Results: A total of 10 patients who received LBBP were included. Median age was 62 years (57-74 years), 40% were women, 20% had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and baseline LVEF was 29% (23%-36%). The baseline median QRS duration was 178 ms (168-187 ms), with a left ventricular activation time (LVAT) of 99 ms (90-109 ms), a right ventricular activation time (RVAT) of 42 ms (34-71 ms), and a total ventricular activation time (TAT) of 111 ms (105-131 ms). A non-tailored AV programming showed a QRS measured from intrinsic deflection of 142 ms (137-149 ms); when a tailored AV was programmed, the median QRS decreased to 124 ms (116-130 ms). Ventricular activation times showed shortening with a tailored approach.
Conclusion: AV interval adjustment during left bundle branch pacing may result in better resynchronization.
背景:优化双室起搏心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)融合(融合优化间隔法)已被证明可以改善左心室重构。然而,关于左束支起搏(LBBP)时房室间期规划的信息很少。目的:应用心电图(ECGI)评价优化室间期在LBBP期间的电效益。方法:回顾性分析前瞻性收集的资料。初步研究包括接受LBBP并伴有CRT指征、房室传导正常、窦性心律正常、左束支阻滞的患者。ECGI用于获得优化房室间期时的无创激活图、心室激活次数和QRS宽度。结果:共纳入10例接受LBBP治疗的患者。中位年龄为62岁(57-74岁),40%为女性,20%为缺血性心肌病,基线LVEF为29%(23%-36%)。QRS基线中位持续时间为178 ms (168-187 ms),左室激活时间(LVAT)为99 ms (90-109 ms),右室激活时间(RVAT)为42 ms (34-71 ms),总心室激活时间(TAT)为111 ms (105-131 ms)。非定制AV编程的QRS测量值为142 ms (137-149 ms);当定制AV编程时,中位QRS降至124 ms (116-130 ms)。量身定制的方法缩短了心室激活时间。结论:调整左束支起搏时的房室间期可改善再同步。