Circulating Cell-free DNA as a biomarker for radiation-induced injury: From mechanistic insights to clinical translation.

IF 8.7
Qixin Sun, Yikun Li, Tianwen Yin, Feifei Teng, Jinming Yu
{"title":"Circulating Cell-free DNA as a biomarker for radiation-induced injury: From mechanistic insights to clinical translation.","authors":"Qixin Sun, Yikun Li, Tianwen Yin, Feifei Teng, Jinming Yu","doi":"10.1007/s10555-026-10374-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has attracted increasing attention as a minimally invasive biomarker for assessing radiation-induced tissue injury. Radiation exposure can alter cfDNA concentration, fragmentation profiles, and methylation patterns. These changes may reflect cellular damage, tissue origin, and temporal responses to irradiation. During radiotherapy, however, cfDNA can arise from tumor cells, irradiated normal tissues, endothelial cells, immune cells, and hematopoietic cells. This mixed origin complicates the interpretation of radiation-related signals. Current evidence is derived mainly from preclinical studies and small, heterogeneous clinical cohorts. Sampling schedules, analytical workflows, and clinical thresholds also vary across studies. Recent advances in fragmentomics, tissue-specific methylation analysis, mitochondrial cfDNA, multi-omics integration, and artificial intelligence have expanded the information obtained from cfDNA. In particular, tissue-specific methylation and fragmentation features may help identify the cellular or organ origin of injury. Nevertheless, prospective multicenter validation and methodological standardization are required before routine clinical use. This review summarizes the mechanisms linking radiation injury to cfDNA release, current detection technologies, and evidence for organ-specific applications. It also discusses clinical confounders, translational barriers, and future directions for integrating cfDNA into precision radiation oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":520582,"journal":{"name":"Cancer metastasis reviews","volume":"45 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13582236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer metastasis reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-026-10374-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has attracted increasing attention as a minimally invasive biomarker for assessing radiation-induced tissue injury. Radiation exposure can alter cfDNA concentration, fragmentation profiles, and methylation patterns. These changes may reflect cellular damage, tissue origin, and temporal responses to irradiation. During radiotherapy, however, cfDNA can arise from tumor cells, irradiated normal tissues, endothelial cells, immune cells, and hematopoietic cells. This mixed origin complicates the interpretation of radiation-related signals. Current evidence is derived mainly from preclinical studies and small, heterogeneous clinical cohorts. Sampling schedules, analytical workflows, and clinical thresholds also vary across studies. Recent advances in fragmentomics, tissue-specific methylation analysis, mitochondrial cfDNA, multi-omics integration, and artificial intelligence have expanded the information obtained from cfDNA. In particular, tissue-specific methylation and fragmentation features may help identify the cellular or organ origin of injury. Nevertheless, prospective multicenter validation and methodological standardization are required before routine clinical use. This review summarizes the mechanisms linking radiation injury to cfDNA release, current detection technologies, and evidence for organ-specific applications. It also discusses clinical confounders, translational barriers, and future directions for integrating cfDNA into precision radiation oncology.

循环无细胞DNA作为辐射损伤的生物标志物:从机制的见解到临床翻译。
循环无细胞DNA (cfDNA)作为一种评估辐射诱导的组织损伤的微创生物标志物受到越来越多的关注。辐射暴露可以改变cfDNA浓度、片段化谱和甲基化模式。这些变化可能反映了细胞损伤、组织起源和对辐照的时间反应。然而,在放射治疗期间,cfDNA可产生于肿瘤细胞、被照射的正常组织、内皮细胞、免疫细胞和造血细胞。这种混合源使对辐射相关信号的解释复杂化。目前的证据主要来自临床前研究和小型、异质性临床队列。采样时间表、分析工作流程和临床阈值也因研究而异。片段组学、组织特异性甲基化分析、线粒体cfDNA、多组学整合和人工智能的最新进展扩大了从cfDNA中获得的信息。特别是,组织特异性甲基化和碎片化特征可能有助于识别损伤的细胞或器官起源。然而,在常规临床应用之前,需要进行前瞻性多中心验证和方法学标准化。本文综述了辐射损伤与cfDNA释放的联系机制、目前的检测技术以及在器官特异性应用方面的证据。它还讨论了临床混杂因素、翻译障碍以及将cfDNA整合到精确放射肿瘤学中的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书