The use of the Neviaser portal for antegrade intramedullary nailing in humerus fractures: a scoping review.

IF 1.7 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Brandon Lim, Gennie Lim, Junren Zhang
{"title":"The use of the Neviaser portal for antegrade intramedullary nailing in humerus fractures: a scoping review.","authors":"Brandon Lim, Gennie Lim, Junren Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00590-026-04957-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Proximal humerus and humeral shaft fractures are common orthopaedic injuries that can be managed using antegrade intramedullary nailing. The Neviaser portal allows a more medial start point at the apex of the humeral head. The published literature on humeral intramedullary nailing through the Neviaser portal is limited and heterogeneous. This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on the use of the Neviaser portal for antegrade intramedullary nailing of humeral fractures, summarise reported indications, surgical techniques, radiographic and functional outcomes, complications, and identify gaps in the current evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library) and two grey-literature sources (Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched. This scoping review was conducted according to the Arksey and O'Malley framework and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines, with reporting in accordance with PRISMA-ScR recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included. Across the clinical studies, 103 patients underwent nailing through the Neviaser portal, although approach-specific outcomes were reported for fewer patients. Indications for its use included both anatomical factors, such as distorted shoulder anatomy or increased soft tissue bulk, and fracture-related factors, including varus deformity and posterior tilt of the humeral head. One comparative study reported statistically significant differences in functional outcomes, while a second descriptively reported shorter operative time and lower radiation exposure. Both studies were small, non-randomised, and conducted at single centres. Cadaveric studies showed that the Neviaser portal traverses the muscular portion of the supraspinatus while maintaining safe distances from adjacent neurovascular structures, supporting its anatomical feasibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence for the Neviaser portal in antegrade intramedullary nailing of humeral fractures remains limited and heterogeneous. Although the available literature supports its anatomical feasibility and potential technical advantages, further high-quality comparative studies are required to define its clinical role.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-026-04957-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Proximal humerus and humeral shaft fractures are common orthopaedic injuries that can be managed using antegrade intramedullary nailing. The Neviaser portal allows a more medial start point at the apex of the humeral head. The published literature on humeral intramedullary nailing through the Neviaser portal is limited and heterogeneous. This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on the use of the Neviaser portal for antegrade intramedullary nailing of humeral fractures, summarise reported indications, surgical techniques, radiographic and functional outcomes, complications, and identify gaps in the current evidence.

Methods: Five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library) and two grey-literature sources (Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched. This scoping review was conducted according to the Arksey and O'Malley framework and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines, with reporting in accordance with PRISMA-ScR recommendations.

Results: Ten studies were included. Across the clinical studies, 103 patients underwent nailing through the Neviaser portal, although approach-specific outcomes were reported for fewer patients. Indications for its use included both anatomical factors, such as distorted shoulder anatomy or increased soft tissue bulk, and fracture-related factors, including varus deformity and posterior tilt of the humeral head. One comparative study reported statistically significant differences in functional outcomes, while a second descriptively reported shorter operative time and lower radiation exposure. Both studies were small, non-randomised, and conducted at single centres. Cadaveric studies showed that the Neviaser portal traverses the muscular portion of the supraspinatus while maintaining safe distances from adjacent neurovascular structures, supporting its anatomical feasibility.

Conclusion: Evidence for the Neviaser portal in antegrade intramedullary nailing of humeral fractures remains limited and heterogeneous. Although the available literature supports its anatomical feasibility and potential technical advantages, further high-quality comparative studies are required to define its clinical role.

应用Neviaser门静脉行顺行髓内钉治疗肱骨骨折:范围回顾。
目的:肱骨近端和肱骨干骨折是常见的骨科损伤,可采用顺行髓内钉治疗。Neviaser门允许在肱骨头顶点处有一个更内侧的起点。已发表的关于通过Neviaser门静脉进行肱骨髓内钉治疗的文献是有限且不一致的。本综述旨在对Neviaser门静脉行顺行髓内钉治疗肱骨骨折的现有文献进行梳理,总结已报道的适应症、手术技术、影像学和功能预后、并发症,并确定当前证据中的空白。方法:检索5个电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane Library)和2个灰色文献源(谷歌Scholar、ClinicalTrials.gov)。根据Arksey和O'Malley框架和Joanna Briggs研究所(JBI)的指导方针进行了范围审查,并根据PRISMA-ScR的建议进行了报告。结果:纳入10项研究。在整个临床研究中,103例患者通过Neviaser门静脉进行了钉入,尽管报道的特定方法的结果较少。它的适应症包括解剖学因素,如肩部解剖扭曲或软组织体积增加,以及骨折相关因素,包括内翻畸形和肱骨头后倾。一项比较研究报告了功能结果的统计显着差异,而另一项描述性地报告了更短的手术时间和更低的辐射暴露。这两项研究都是小规模、非随机、单中心进行的。尸体研究表明,Neviaser门穿过冈上肌的肌肉部分,同时与邻近的神经血管结构保持安全距离,支持其解剖学上的可行性。结论:Neviaser门静脉在肱骨骨折顺行髓内钉治疗中的应用证据仍然有限且不一致。虽然现有文献支持其解剖学可行性和潜在的技术优势,但需要进一步的高质量比较研究来确定其临床作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书