Analysis of Safety Incidents and Implementation of Recommendations in Spanish Pediatric Emergency Departments: Results of a Multicenter Study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maria Garcia de Oteyza, Yordana Acedo Alonso, Leticia Bueso-Inchausti García, María Suárez-Bustamante Huélamo, Carmen Campos Calleja, Rocio Rodrigo García, Marta Plata Gallardo, Sofía Mesa García, Carmen Solano Navarro, Esther García Requena, Abel Martínez Mejías, Monica Hortiguela Aparicio, Isabela Adelina Albiciuc, Victoria López Corominas, Jose Lorenzo Guerra Diez, Mariano Plana Fernández, Estíbaliz Garrido García, Ana Jové-Blanco, Rafael Marañón
{"title":"Analysis of Safety Incidents and Implementation of Recommendations in Spanish Pediatric Emergency Departments: Results of a Multicenter Study.","authors":"Maria Garcia de Oteyza, Yordana Acedo Alonso, Leticia Bueso-Inchausti García, María Suárez-Bustamante Huélamo, Carmen Campos Calleja, Rocio Rodrigo García, Marta Plata Gallardo, Sofía Mesa García, Carmen Solano Navarro, Esther García Requena, Abel Martínez Mejías, Monica Hortiguela Aparicio, Isabela Adelina Albiciuc, Victoria López Corominas, Jose Lorenzo Guerra Diez, Mariano Plana Fernández, Estíbaliz Garrido García, Ana Jové-Blanco, Rafael Marañón","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There are few studies in the literature that analyze which methods are most commonly used to analyze safety incidents in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) and which recommendations are established. The main objective of this study was to identify the incidents most frequently reported in PEDs and their characteristics. The secondary objectives were to analyze the factors that may influence the occurrence of adverse events, identify the tools most commonly used in incident analysis, and analyze the safe practices most frequently recommended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicenter study was conducted involving hospitals belonging to the RISEUP network. Incidents that occurred between January and December 2024 in the different participating centers reported through a computerized registration system were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 580 incidents were reported, involving 17 hospitals. The most frequently reported incidents were miscellaneous, followed by medication, with dosing errors being the most common subtype. A total of 190 adverse events occurred. A recommendation was made in 397 (68.4%) of the reported incidents; most of them were weak in terms of strength, based on communication with staff, new operating procedures, and health education. When stratifying the strength by harm severity, weak recommendations remained the predominant in all the categories of harm. A total of 86.1% of the recommendations were implemented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In most of the reported incidents, a recommendation was made and implemented. However, most recommendations were classified as weak in terms of their potential to improve patient safety, highlighting the need for the development and adoption of more robust safety interventions in pediatric emergency departments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001587","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There are few studies in the literature that analyze which methods are most commonly used to analyze safety incidents in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) and which recommendations are established. The main objective of this study was to identify the incidents most frequently reported in PEDs and their characteristics. The secondary objectives were to analyze the factors that may influence the occurrence of adverse events, identify the tools most commonly used in incident analysis, and analyze the safe practices most frequently recommended.

Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted involving hospitals belonging to the RISEUP network. Incidents that occurred between January and December 2024 in the different participating centers reported through a computerized registration system were included.

Results: A total of 580 incidents were reported, involving 17 hospitals. The most frequently reported incidents were miscellaneous, followed by medication, with dosing errors being the most common subtype. A total of 190 adverse events occurred. A recommendation was made in 397 (68.4%) of the reported incidents; most of them were weak in terms of strength, based on communication with staff, new operating procedures, and health education. When stratifying the strength by harm severity, weak recommendations remained the predominant in all the categories of harm. A total of 86.1% of the recommendations were implemented.

Conclusions: In most of the reported incidents, a recommendation was made and implemented. However, most recommendations were classified as weak in terms of their potential to improve patient safety, highlighting the need for the development and adoption of more robust safety interventions in pediatric emergency departments.

西班牙儿科急诊科安全事件分析及建议实施:一项多中心研究的结果
目的:文献中很少有研究分析儿科急诊科(PEDs)安全事件最常用的分析方法以及建立了哪些建议。本研究的主要目的是确定儿科最常报告的事件及其特征。次要目标是分析可能影响不良事件发生的因素,确定事件分析中最常用的工具,并分析最常推荐的安全做法。方法:对RISEUP网络所属医院进行回顾性多中心研究。通过计算机登记系统报告的2024年1月至12月期间在不同参与中心发生的事件被包括在内。结果:共报告580起事故,涉及17家医院。最常见的报告事件是各种各样的,其次是药物,剂量错误是最常见的亚型。共发生190例不良事件。在报告的事件中,有397起(68.4%)提出了建议;根据与工作人员的沟通,新的操作程序和健康教育,他们中的大多数在力量方面较弱。当按危害严重程度对强度进行分层时,弱建议在所有危害类别中仍然占主导地位。建议落实率达86.1%。结论:在大多数报告的事件中,提出并实施了建议。然而,就改善患者安全的潜力而言,大多数建议被归类为薄弱,这突出了在儿科急诊科制定和采用更强有力的安全干预措施的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书