Beta Testing an mHealth Symptom Management Intervention for People With Advanced Cancer: Single-Cohort Feasibility and Acceptability Study.

IF 2.6 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JMIR Cancer Pub Date : 2026-09-16 DOI:10.2196/94676
Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio, Tanya Smit, Sarah Baltimore, Don M Benson, Steve K Clinton, Ashley P Davenport, Kari L Kendra, Carolyn J Presley, Donald R Marks
{"title":"Beta Testing an mHealth Symptom Management Intervention for People With Advanced Cancer: Single-Cohort Feasibility and Acceptability Study.","authors":"Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio, Tanya Smit, Sarah Baltimore, Don M Benson, Steve K Clinton, Ashley P Davenport, Kari L Kendra, Carolyn J Presley, Donald R Marks","doi":"10.2196/94676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People living with advanced cancer experience more frequent and severe symptoms than those with early-stage disease. Common, distressing symptoms include sleep difficulties, worry and uncertainty, fatigue, and depression. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) effectively manage these symptoms but are often too time intensive for patients with multiple appointments, limited energy, and competing priorities. Brief, mobile health (mHealth) interventions provide an accessible alternative, particularly for rural patients with limited access to palliative or psychosocial oncology services.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Building on our successful in-person and Digital Video Disk-based pilot trial of a 3-session, integrated CBT-ACT symptom management intervention for patients with advanced cancer, Finding Our Center Under Stress (FOCUS), the current study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a 4-session mHealth version.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-cohort feasibility and acceptability study, people with advanced cancer were recruited from hospital-based oncology clinics representing 4 cancer types (breast, melanoma, multiple myeloma, and prostate). Baseline assessments included sociodemographic data, patient-reported outcomes for sleep (Insomnia Severity Index), anxiety (7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale and Penn State Worry Questionnaire), fatigue (Fatigue Symptom Inventory), depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), and a 7-day sleep diary completed in the app. Participants then completed 4 modules addressing sleep difficulties, worry and uncertainty, fatigue, and depression. Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Feasibility benchmarks included recruitment (50% enrollment), retention (70%), and app completion (50%). After 6 weeks, participants completed the Internet Evaluation and Utility Questionnaire, and a subset completed qualitative interviews about their experience with the FOCUS app. We report quantitative and qualitative findings and lessons learned from app development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 64.7% (11/17) of the approached patients enrolled, and 70% (7/10) completed more than half of the app. Participants rated FOCUS highly for ease of understanding (mean 3.83/4, SD 0.41), convenience (mean 3.67/4, SD 0.82), and utility (mean 3.33/4, SD 0.82). All participants would recommend the app to others and would use it again for future problems. Favorite components included patient videos and the Sleep and Worry and Uncertainty Modules. Suggested improvements included video quality (lighting and sound), sleep diary usability, and additional professional guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FOCUS intervention was successfully delivered via mobile technology and demonstrated feasibility and acceptability in beta testing. The FOCUS mHealth app offers an evidence-based, accessible symptom management intervention for people with advanced cancer, particularly in rural communities. Guided by participant feedback, FOCUS 2.0 will enhance video segments, add telehealth support, and expand interactive and motivational features. A randomized controlled trial will evaluate its effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":"12 ","pages":"e94676"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13581146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/94676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People living with advanced cancer experience more frequent and severe symptoms than those with early-stage disease. Common, distressing symptoms include sleep difficulties, worry and uncertainty, fatigue, and depression. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) effectively manage these symptoms but are often too time intensive for patients with multiple appointments, limited energy, and competing priorities. Brief, mobile health (mHealth) interventions provide an accessible alternative, particularly for rural patients with limited access to palliative or psychosocial oncology services.

Objective: Building on our successful in-person and Digital Video Disk-based pilot trial of a 3-session, integrated CBT-ACT symptom management intervention for patients with advanced cancer, Finding Our Center Under Stress (FOCUS), the current study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a 4-session mHealth version.

Methods: In this single-cohort feasibility and acceptability study, people with advanced cancer were recruited from hospital-based oncology clinics representing 4 cancer types (breast, melanoma, multiple myeloma, and prostate). Baseline assessments included sociodemographic data, patient-reported outcomes for sleep (Insomnia Severity Index), anxiety (7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale and Penn State Worry Questionnaire), fatigue (Fatigue Symptom Inventory), depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), and a 7-day sleep diary completed in the app. Participants then completed 4 modules addressing sleep difficulties, worry and uncertainty, fatigue, and depression. Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Feasibility benchmarks included recruitment (50% enrollment), retention (70%), and app completion (50%). After 6 weeks, participants completed the Internet Evaluation and Utility Questionnaire, and a subset completed qualitative interviews about their experience with the FOCUS app. We report quantitative and qualitative findings and lessons learned from app development.

Results: Overall, 64.7% (11/17) of the approached patients enrolled, and 70% (7/10) completed more than half of the app. Participants rated FOCUS highly for ease of understanding (mean 3.83/4, SD 0.41), convenience (mean 3.67/4, SD 0.82), and utility (mean 3.33/4, SD 0.82). All participants would recommend the app to others and would use it again for future problems. Favorite components included patient videos and the Sleep and Worry and Uncertainty Modules. Suggested improvements included video quality (lighting and sound), sleep diary usability, and additional professional guidance.

Conclusions: The FOCUS intervention was successfully delivered via mobile technology and demonstrated feasibility and acceptability in beta testing. The FOCUS mHealth app offers an evidence-based, accessible symptom management intervention for people with advanced cancer, particularly in rural communities. Guided by participant feedback, FOCUS 2.0 will enhance video segments, add telehealth support, and expand interactive and motivational features. A randomized controlled trial will evaluate its effectiveness.

晚期癌症患者的移动健康症状管理干预Beta测试:单队列可行性和可接受性研究
背景:晚期癌症患者的症状比早期癌症患者更频繁和严重。常见的令人痛苦的症状包括睡眠困难、担忧和不确定、疲劳和抑郁。认知行为疗法(CBT)和接受与承诺疗法(ACT)可以有效地控制这些症状,但对于多次预约、精力有限和优先事项相互竞争的患者来说,往往过于耗时。简而言之,移动保健(mHealth)干预措施提供了一种可获得的替代方案,特别是对于获得姑息治疗或心理社会肿瘤学服务有限的农村患者。目的:基于我们成功的现场和基于数字视频磁盘的晚期癌症患者3阶段综合CBT-ACT症状管理干预试验,在压力下寻找我们的中心(FOCUS),目前的研究评估了4阶段移动健康版本的可行性和可接受性。方法:在这项单队列可行性和可接受性研究中,从医院肿瘤诊所招募了4种癌症类型(乳腺癌、黑色素瘤、多发性骨髓瘤和前列腺癌)的晚期癌症患者。基线评估包括社会人口统计数据、患者报告的睡眠结果(失眠严重指数)、焦虑(7项广发性焦虑障碍量表和宾夕法尼亚州立大学焦虑问卷)、疲劳(疲劳症状清单)、抑郁(流行病学研究中心抑郁量表),以及在应用程序中完成的7天睡眠日记。参与者随后完成4个模块,解决睡眠困难、担忧和不确定性、疲劳和抑郁。主要结局是可行性和可接受性。可行性基准包括招聘(50%注册)、保留(70%)和应用完成(50%)。6周后,参与者完成了互联网评估和效用问卷,一部分人完成了关于FOCUS应用体验的定性访谈。我们报告了定量和定性调查结果以及从应用开发中获得的经验教训。结果:总体而言,64.7%(11/17)的患者入组,70%(7/10)的患者完成了超过一半的应用程序。参与者在易于理解(平均3.83/4,SD 0.41),便利性(平均3.67/4,SD 0.82)和实用性(平均3.33/4,SD 0.82)方面给予FOCUS高度评价。所有参与者都会向其他人推荐该应用程序,并在未来的问题中再次使用它。最受欢迎的组件包括患者视频和睡眠、担忧和不确定性模块。建议的改进包括视频质量(灯光和声音)、睡眠日记的可用性和额外的专业指导。结论:FOCUS干预通过移动技术成功传递,并在beta测试中证明了可行性和可接受性。FOCUS移动健康应用程序为晚期癌症患者提供了一种基于证据的、可访问的症状管理干预措施,特别是在农村社区。在参与者反馈的指导下,FOCUS 2.0将增强视频片段,增加远程医疗支持,并扩展互动和激励功能。一项随机对照试验将评估其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Cancer
JMIR Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书