Multiple-Bar Repair for Pediatric Pectus Excavatum: A Large Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study of Safety and Efficacy.

IF 1.5 Q4 Medicine
Ji Won Kwak, Gongmin Rim, Young Mog Shim, Seung Keun Yoon, Hyung Joo Park
{"title":"Multiple-Bar Repair for Pediatric Pectus Excavatum: A Large Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study of Safety and Efficacy.","authors":"Ji Won Kwak, Gongmin Rim, Young Mog Shim, Seung Keun Yoon, Hyung Joo Park","doi":"10.5090/jcs.26.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical repair of pectus excavatum (PE) has evolved from simple sternal elevation toward comprehensive chest wall remodeling with multiple bars. However, concerns about postoperative pain and technical complexity have limited adoption of multiple-bar repair in children. We implemented multiple-bar repair across all age groups and evaluated its safety and efficacy in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between November 2019 and November 2023, 469 patients underwent surgical PE repair; 210 pediatric patients aged 3-12 years met the inclusion criteria. Variables included deformity symmetry, the Haller index, postoperative complications, rescue analgesic use, and length of hospitalization. Propensity score matching (PSM) balanced baseline characteristics between single-bar and multiple-bar groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified an age threshold associated with multiple-bar selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the unmatched cohort (single-bar group, n=82; multiple-bar group, n=128), patients undergoing multiple-bar repair were significantly older. The Haller index did not differ significantly between groups. Rates of pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and wound complications were similar, and bar dislocation occurred only in the single-bar group. Length of hospitalization was also comparable. After 1:1 PSM, 33 matched pairs were identified, and baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. The multiple-bar group had a shorter hospital stay (4.3 days vs. 4.8 days, p<0.01). ROC curve analysis identified age ≥7 years as the optimal cutoff associated with the selection of multiple-bar repair (area under the curve, 0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple-bar repair was not associated with higher postoperative complication rates or rescue analgesic requirements and may be a safe, feasible option for selected pediatric patients with PE.</p>","PeriodicalId":34499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chest Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chest Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5090/jcs.26.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical repair of pectus excavatum (PE) has evolved from simple sternal elevation toward comprehensive chest wall remodeling with multiple bars. However, concerns about postoperative pain and technical complexity have limited adoption of multiple-bar repair in children. We implemented multiple-bar repair across all age groups and evaluated its safety and efficacy in pediatric patients.

Methods: Between November 2019 and November 2023, 469 patients underwent surgical PE repair; 210 pediatric patients aged 3-12 years met the inclusion criteria. Variables included deformity symmetry, the Haller index, postoperative complications, rescue analgesic use, and length of hospitalization. Propensity score matching (PSM) balanced baseline characteristics between single-bar and multiple-bar groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified an age threshold associated with multiple-bar selection.

Results: In the unmatched cohort (single-bar group, n=82; multiple-bar group, n=128), patients undergoing multiple-bar repair were significantly older. The Haller index did not differ significantly between groups. Rates of pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and wound complications were similar, and bar dislocation occurred only in the single-bar group. Length of hospitalization was also comparable. After 1:1 PSM, 33 matched pairs were identified, and baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. The multiple-bar group had a shorter hospital stay (4.3 days vs. 4.8 days, p<0.01). ROC curve analysis identified age ≥7 years as the optimal cutoff associated with the selection of multiple-bar repair (area under the curve, 0.82).

Conclusion: Multiple-bar repair was not associated with higher postoperative complication rates or rescue analgesic requirements and may be a safe, feasible option for selected pediatric patients with PE.

儿童漏斗胸多棒修复:安全性和有效性的大倾向评分匹配队列研究。
背景:漏斗胸(PE)的手术修复已经从简单的胸骨提升发展到综合胸壁多棒重塑。然而,对术后疼痛和技术复杂性的担忧限制了儿童多棒修复的采用。我们在所有年龄组实施了多棒修复,并评估了其在儿科患者中的安全性和有效性。方法:2019年11月至2023年11月,469例患者接受了PE手术修复;210名3-12岁的儿童患者符合纳入标准。变量包括畸形对称性、Haller指数、术后并发症、抢救镇痛药的使用和住院时间。倾向评分匹配(PSM)平衡了单条组和多条组之间的基线特征。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定了与多柱选择相关的年龄阈值。结果:在未匹配的队列中(单棒组,n=82;多棒组,n=128),接受多棒修复的患者明显年龄较大。各组间Haller指数无显著差异。气胸、胸腔积液和伤口并发症的发生率相似,仅在单筋棒组发生筋棒脱位。住院时间也具有可比性。1:1 PSM后,鉴定出33对配对,各组间基线特征平衡。多棒组住院时间较短(4.3天vs 4.8天)。结论:多棒修复与较高的术后并发症发生率或救援镇痛需求无关,对于特定的PE患儿来说可能是一种安全可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chest Surgery
Journal of Chest Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书