{"title":"Privacy-aware adversarial defense with explainable AI for adversarial robustness in AI model.","authors":"Bilal Sardar, Shareeful Islam, Stefano Silvestri, Spyridon Papastergiou","doi":"10.1007/s40860-026-00273-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AI models in critical sectors such as healthcare and finance must provide both data privacy and adversarial robustness. Differential Privacy (DP) protects training data by injecting noise, but this noise smooths decision boundaries and leaves models open to adversarial evasion, a tension known as the Privacy-Robustness Trade-off. Although this trade-off is well documented, its internal mechanism remains underexplored: prior work does not reveal how the noise reshapes a model's reasoning or which features become vulnerable. To close this gap, we propose a Privacy-Aware Adversarial Defense grounded in Explainable AI. Specifically, we introduce the Attention Concentration Score (ACS), which measures how DP training shifts Transformer attention away from task-critical features toward non-functional ones. This attention drift correlates with adversarial vulnerability, providing a mechanistic explanation of the trade-off. Building on this insight, we develop a Manifold-Aligned Semantic Attack that targets the most drifted features, and a TrustScore defense that fuses embedding-level anomaly detection with attention-level consistency checks. We validate across two datasets (Adult Census, MIMIC-IV), two architectures (DeBERTa-V3-Large, LLaMA-3.1-8B), and seven experiments benchmarking five attacks against six defenses. Within the recommended range ( <math><mrow><mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo>[</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>10</mn> <mo>]</mo></mrow> </math> ), models retain 84.2% accuracy (96.2% of baseline), while TrustScore reaches an Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 0.87--0.94, outperforming Isolation Forest (0.65) and supervised detection (0.58). Moreover, these conclusions hold under feature-categorization variants (attribution- and PCA-based); privacy noise disproportionately destabilizes the minority class; the consistency signal adds sub-millisecond overhead; and a surrogate-attention variant preserves detection under black-box deployment, establishing the approach's dependability for reliable intelligent environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":37011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments","volume":"12 4","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13577975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-026-00273-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AI models in critical sectors such as healthcare and finance must provide both data privacy and adversarial robustness. Differential Privacy (DP) protects training data by injecting noise, but this noise smooths decision boundaries and leaves models open to adversarial evasion, a tension known as the Privacy-Robustness Trade-off. Although this trade-off is well documented, its internal mechanism remains underexplored: prior work does not reveal how the noise reshapes a model's reasoning or which features become vulnerable. To close this gap, we propose a Privacy-Aware Adversarial Defense grounded in Explainable AI. Specifically, we introduce the Attention Concentration Score (ACS), which measures how DP training shifts Transformer attention away from task-critical features toward non-functional ones. This attention drift correlates with adversarial vulnerability, providing a mechanistic explanation of the trade-off. Building on this insight, we develop a Manifold-Aligned Semantic Attack that targets the most drifted features, and a TrustScore defense that fuses embedding-level anomaly detection with attention-level consistency checks. We validate across two datasets (Adult Census, MIMIC-IV), two architectures (DeBERTa-V3-Large, LLaMA-3.1-8B), and seven experiments benchmarking five attacks against six defenses. Within the recommended range ( ), models retain 84.2% accuracy (96.2% of baseline), while TrustScore reaches an Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 0.87--0.94, outperforming Isolation Forest (0.65) and supervised detection (0.58). Moreover, these conclusions hold under feature-categorization variants (attribution- and PCA-based); privacy noise disproportionately destabilizes the minority class; the consistency signal adds sub-millisecond overhead; and a surrogate-attention variant preserves detection under black-box deployment, establishing the approach's dependability for reliable intelligent environments.
期刊介绍:
“Intelligent Environments (IEs)” is growing fast as a multi-disciplinary field allowing many areas of research to have a real beneficial influence in our society. The basic idea behind these systems is that by enriching an environment with technology (sensors, processors, actuators, information terminals, and other devices interconnected through a network), a system can be built such that based on the real-time information gathered and the historical data accumulated, decisions can be taken to benefit the users of that environment. Expected benefits of this technology can be: (a) increasing safety (e.g., by monitoring lifestyle patterns or the latest activities and providing assistance when a possibly harmful situation is developing), (b) comfort (e.g., by adjusting temperature automatically), and (c) economy (e.g., controlling the use of lights). The Journal on Reliable Intelligent Environments focuses on theoretical developments and lessons learnt on the deployment of IEs. The broad areas represented in the journal reflect the fact that reliability of software systems is the result of a number of approaches combined so an overarching principle of our publication will be to be open and flexible to embrace all type of techniques which can increase confidence in Intelligent Environments systems: selection, installation and calibration of equipmentdeployment and maintenance problemsrequirementsmodelingsimulationtestingvalidationformal verificationpeople-centred computingtoolspilots designsoftware development processsecurityprivacyusabilitysafetyperformancequality of servicelarge-scale integrationscalabilityadaptiveness and autonomicity