Privacy-aware adversarial defense with explainable AI for adversarial robustness in AI model.

Q1 Computer Science
Bilal Sardar, Shareeful Islam, Stefano Silvestri, Spyridon Papastergiou
{"title":"Privacy-aware adversarial defense with explainable AI for adversarial robustness in AI model.","authors":"Bilal Sardar, Shareeful Islam, Stefano Silvestri, Spyridon Papastergiou","doi":"10.1007/s40860-026-00273-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AI models in critical sectors such as healthcare and finance must provide both data privacy and adversarial robustness. Differential Privacy (DP) protects training data by injecting noise, but this noise smooths decision boundaries and leaves models open to adversarial evasion, a tension known as the Privacy-Robustness Trade-off. Although this trade-off is well documented, its internal mechanism remains underexplored: prior work does not reveal how the noise reshapes a model's reasoning or which features become vulnerable. To close this gap, we propose a Privacy-Aware Adversarial Defense grounded in Explainable AI. Specifically, we introduce the Attention Concentration Score (ACS), which measures how DP training shifts Transformer attention away from task-critical features toward non-functional ones. This attention drift correlates with adversarial vulnerability, providing a mechanistic explanation of the trade-off. Building on this insight, we develop a Manifold-Aligned Semantic Attack that targets the most drifted features, and a TrustScore defense that fuses embedding-level anomaly detection with attention-level consistency checks. We validate across two datasets (Adult Census, MIMIC-IV), two architectures (DeBERTa-V3-Large, LLaMA-3.1-8B), and seven experiments benchmarking five attacks against six defenses. Within the recommended range ( <math><mrow><mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo>[</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>10</mn> <mo>]</mo></mrow> </math> ), models retain 84.2% accuracy (96.2% of baseline), while TrustScore reaches an Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 0.87--0.94, outperforming Isolation Forest (0.65) and supervised detection (0.58). Moreover, these conclusions hold under feature-categorization variants (attribution- and PCA-based); privacy noise disproportionately destabilizes the minority class; the consistency signal adds sub-millisecond overhead; and a surrogate-attention variant preserves detection under black-box deployment, establishing the approach's dependability for reliable intelligent environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":37011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments","volume":"12 4","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13577975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-026-00273-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI models in critical sectors such as healthcare and finance must provide both data privacy and adversarial robustness. Differential Privacy (DP) protects training data by injecting noise, but this noise smooths decision boundaries and leaves models open to adversarial evasion, a tension known as the Privacy-Robustness Trade-off. Although this trade-off is well documented, its internal mechanism remains underexplored: prior work does not reveal how the noise reshapes a model's reasoning or which features become vulnerable. To close this gap, we propose a Privacy-Aware Adversarial Defense grounded in Explainable AI. Specifically, we introduce the Attention Concentration Score (ACS), which measures how DP training shifts Transformer attention away from task-critical features toward non-functional ones. This attention drift correlates with adversarial vulnerability, providing a mechanistic explanation of the trade-off. Building on this insight, we develop a Manifold-Aligned Semantic Attack that targets the most drifted features, and a TrustScore defense that fuses embedding-level anomaly detection with attention-level consistency checks. We validate across two datasets (Adult Census, MIMIC-IV), two architectures (DeBERTa-V3-Large, LLaMA-3.1-8B), and seven experiments benchmarking five attacks against six defenses. Within the recommended range ( ϵ ∈ [ 5 , 10 ] ), models retain 84.2% accuracy (96.2% of baseline), while TrustScore reaches an Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 0.87--0.94, outperforming Isolation Forest (0.65) and supervised detection (0.58). Moreover, these conclusions hold under feature-categorization variants (attribution- and PCA-based); privacy noise disproportionately destabilizes the minority class; the consistency signal adds sub-millisecond overhead; and a surrogate-attention variant preserves detection under black-box deployment, establishing the approach's dependability for reliable intelligent environments.

具有可解释AI的隐私感知对抗防御,用于AI模型中的对抗鲁棒性。
医疗保健和金融等关键领域的人工智能模型必须同时提供数据隐私和对抗稳健性。差分隐私(DP)通过注入噪声来保护训练数据,但这种噪声平滑了决策边界,并使模型容易受到对抗性规避,这种紧张关系被称为隐私-鲁棒性权衡。尽管这种权衡已被充分记录,但其内部机制仍未得到充分探索:先前的工作并未揭示噪声如何重塑模型的推理或哪些特征变得脆弱。为了缩小这一差距,我们提出了一种基于可解释人工智能的隐私意识对抗性防御。具体来说,我们介绍了注意力集中分数(ACS),它衡量DP训练如何将Transformer的注意力从任务关键型特征转移到非功能性特征。这种注意力漂移与对抗性脆弱性相关,为这种权衡提供了一种机制解释。基于这一见解,我们开发了一种针对最漂移特征的流形对齐语义攻击,以及一种融合了嵌入级异常检测和注意力级一致性检查的TrustScore防御。我们验证了两个数据集(Adult Census, MIMIC-IV),两个架构(DeBERTa-V3-Large, LLaMA-3.1-8B)和七个实验,对六种防御进行了五种攻击的基准测试。在推荐范围内(λ∈[5,10]),模型保持了84.2%的准确率(基线的96.2%),而TrustScore达到了0.87—0.94的ROC曲线下面积(AUC),优于隔离森林(0.65)和监督检测(0.58)。此外,这些结论在特征分类变体(基于归因和基于pca)下成立;隐私噪音不成比例地破坏了少数族裔阶层的稳定;一致性信号增加了亚毫秒级的开销;在黑箱部署下,代理关注变体保留了检测,建立了该方法在可靠智能环境中的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments
Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: “Intelligent Environments (IEs)” is growing fast as a multi-disciplinary field allowing many areas of research to have a real beneficial influence in our society. The basic idea behind these systems is that by enriching an environment with technology (sensors, processors, actuators, information terminals, and other devices interconnected through a network), a system can be built such that based on the real-time information gathered and the historical data accumulated, decisions can be taken to benefit the users of that environment. Expected benefits of this technology can be: (a) increasing safety (e.g., by monitoring lifestyle patterns or the latest activities and providing assistance when a possibly harmful situation is developing), (b) comfort (e.g., by adjusting temperature automatically), and (c) economy (e.g., controlling the use of lights). The Journal on Reliable Intelligent Environments focuses on theoretical developments and lessons learnt on the deployment of IEs.  The broad areas represented in the journal reflect the fact that reliability of software systems is the result of a number of approaches combined so an overarching principle of our publication will be to be open and flexible to embrace all type of techniques which can increase confidence in Intelligent Environments systems: selection, installation and calibration of equipmentdeployment and maintenance problemsrequirementsmodelingsimulationtestingvalidationformal verificationpeople-centred computingtoolspilots designsoftware development processsecurityprivacyusabilitysafetyperformancequality of servicelarge-scale integrationscalabilityadaptiveness and autonomicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书