Clinical evaluation of AI-assisted quantitative marrow fibrosis assessment using Continuous Indexing of Fibrosis (CIF).

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Sharon Ruane, Rosalin A Cooper, Carlo Pescia, Neha Bhardwaj, Anna Green, Deborah Hay, Jana Ihlow, Fatima Zahra Jelloul, Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna, Philip Macklin, Vidhya Manohar, Edoardo Olmeda, Mark Ong, Andres Quesada, Jens Rittscher, Hosuk Ryou, Saad Bashir, Sam Maxwell, Ka Ho Tam, Alan Aberdeen, Len Brandes, Korsuk Sirinukunwattana, Timothy Ebsworth, Daniel Royston
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of AI-assisted quantitative marrow fibrosis assessment using Continuous Indexing of Fibrosis (CIF).","authors":"Sharon Ruane, Rosalin A Cooper, Carlo Pescia, Neha Bhardwaj, Anna Green, Deborah Hay, Jana Ihlow, Fatima Zahra Jelloul, Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna, Philip Macklin, Vidhya Manohar, Edoardo Olmeda, Mark Ong, Andres Quesada, Jens Rittscher, Hosuk Ryou, Saad Bashir, Sam Maxwell, Ka Ho Tam, Alan Aberdeen, Len Brandes, Korsuk Sirinukunwattana, Timothy Ebsworth, Daniel Royston","doi":"10.1038/s41375-026-03126-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessment of fibrosis is central to the evaluation of diagnostic bone marrow trephine (BMT) biopsies. However, manual fibrosis grading is subjective and only semi-quantitative. We evaluated the clinical utility of a previously developed AI-based quantitative fibrosis assessment tool, Continuous Indexing of Fibrosis (CIF), using ~1000 consecutive BMT biopsies without pre-selection. An international panel of 14 haematopathologists performed manual reads using whole-slide images (WSI) of reticulin-stained slides and two types of CIF-assisted reads (Sequential-assisted and Concurrent-assisted) across three study rounds. The AI-derived CIF scores correlated strongly with the manual consensus MF grade (Spearman ρ = 0.770) and demonstrated good discriminative performance across adjacent MF grade boundaries. The CIF-assisted protocols significantly improved intra-observer and inter-observer agreement compared to manual assessment, without increasing read times. Sequential-assisted reads yielded the largest gain in inter-observer agreement (12.6 percentage points; 95% CI 10.5-14.8) and improved agreement with the consensus reference (3.0 percentage points; 95% CI 0.4-5.7). Both assisted protocols reduced discordance across the clinically significant MF-1 / MF-2 boundary. These findings demonstrate that AI-assisted quantitative bone marrow fibrosis assessment using CIF is reproducible, efficient and well suited for future clinical deployment testing. This supports a future role in standardising routine diagnostic haematopathology and enhancing the sensitivity of fibrosis-based clinical trial endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-026-03126-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment of fibrosis is central to the evaluation of diagnostic bone marrow trephine (BMT) biopsies. However, manual fibrosis grading is subjective and only semi-quantitative. We evaluated the clinical utility of a previously developed AI-based quantitative fibrosis assessment tool, Continuous Indexing of Fibrosis (CIF), using ~1000 consecutive BMT biopsies without pre-selection. An international panel of 14 haematopathologists performed manual reads using whole-slide images (WSI) of reticulin-stained slides and two types of CIF-assisted reads (Sequential-assisted and Concurrent-assisted) across three study rounds. The AI-derived CIF scores correlated strongly with the manual consensus MF grade (Spearman ρ = 0.770) and demonstrated good discriminative performance across adjacent MF grade boundaries. The CIF-assisted protocols significantly improved intra-observer and inter-observer agreement compared to manual assessment, without increasing read times. Sequential-assisted reads yielded the largest gain in inter-observer agreement (12.6 percentage points; 95% CI 10.5-14.8) and improved agreement with the consensus reference (3.0 percentage points; 95% CI 0.4-5.7). Both assisted protocols reduced discordance across the clinically significant MF-1 / MF-2 boundary. These findings demonstrate that AI-assisted quantitative bone marrow fibrosis assessment using CIF is reproducible, efficient and well suited for future clinical deployment testing. This supports a future role in standardising routine diagnostic haematopathology and enhancing the sensitivity of fibrosis-based clinical trial endpoints.

Abstract Image

使用纤维化连续指数(CIF)进行人工智能辅助定量骨髓纤维化评估的临床评价。
评估纤维化是诊断性骨髓环钻(BMT)活检评估的核心。然而,手工纤维化分级是主观的,只是半定量的。我们评估了先前开发的基于人工智能的定量纤维化评估工具,纤维化连续索引(CIF)的临床效用,使用了约1000个连续的BMT活检,没有预先选择。一个由14名血液病理学家组成的国际小组在三轮研究中使用网状蛋白染色的载片的全片图像(WSI)和两种类型的cif辅助读取(顺序辅助和并发辅助)进行手动读取。人工智能衍生的CIF评分与人工共识的MF等级(Spearman ρ = 0.770)强烈相关,并且在相邻的MF等级边界上表现出良好的判别性能。与人工评估相比,cf辅助协议显著改善了观察员内部和观察员之间的一致性,而不增加读取时间。序列辅助读取在观察者间一致性(12.6个百分点,95% CI 10.5-14.8)和与共识参考的一致性(3.0个百分点,95% CI 0.4-5.7)方面获得了最大的增益。两种辅助方案都减少了临床上重要的MF-1 / MF-2边界的不一致。这些发现表明,使用CIF进行人工智能辅助的定量骨髓纤维化评估是可重复的、有效的,非常适合未来的临床部署测试。这支持了标准化常规血液病理学诊断和增强基于纤维化的临床试验终点的敏感性的未来作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Leukemia
Leukemia 医学-血液学
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
3.50%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Title: Leukemia Journal Overview: Publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research Covers all aspects of research and treatment of leukemia and allied diseases Includes studies of normal hemopoiesis due to comparative relevance Topics of Interest: Oncogenes Growth factors Stem cells Leukemia genomics Cell cycle Signal transduction Molecular targets for therapy And more Content Types: Original research articles Reviews Letters Correspondence Comments elaborating on significant advances and covering topical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书