Caregiver outcomes in nurse-led telephonic versus specialty palliative care for the seriously ill.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Richelle J Cooper, Oscar de la Rosa, Mara Flannery, Allison Cuthel, Rebecca Liddicoat Yamarik, Keith S Goldfeld, Corita R Grudzen
{"title":"Caregiver outcomes in nurse-led telephonic versus specialty palliative care for the seriously ill.","authors":"Richelle J Cooper, Oscar de la Rosa, Mara Flannery, Allison Cuthel, Rebecca Liddicoat Yamarik, Keith S Goldfeld, Corita R Grudzen","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2026-006291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong> Caregivers of persons living with serious illness suffer from stress, anxiety and depression. We aim to assess caregiver strain, quality of life (QOL) and bereavement of caregivers of patients enrolled in Emergency Medicine Palliative Care Access (EMPallA), a multicentre randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients and caregivers were recruited between April 2018 and June 2022 in 18 emergency departments in the USA. Caregiver inclusion criteria were 18 years or older, spoke English or Spanish, and were primary caregivers of enrolled patients. We randomised patient-caregiver dyads at the patient level. Caregivers were encouraged to accompany patients in both care models (nurse-led telephonic palliative care or specialty palliative care), although there was no specific caregiver intervention. We performed mixed effects linear regression models to assess change in caregiver strain and QOL at 6 months and bereavement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 323 caregivers, mean age was 56.9 (SD 14.2), 221 (68%) were female and 77 (24%) were Black. The analysis did not reveal any differences in caregiver strain, QOL, and bereavement between the two care models. The estimated difference in average change in strain scores between groups was -1.6 points (95% CI: -3.4 to 0.3), average change in caregiver physical QOL was 0.5 (95% CI: -0.9 to 1.8), average change in caregiver mental health QOL was 1.8 (95% CI: -0.1 to 3.6) and average change in bereavement scores was 1.8 (95% CI: -2.9 to 6.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study did not demonstrate that nurse-led telephonic care improved caregiver strain, QOL or bereavement outcomes compared with traditional outpatient palliative care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03325985.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2026-006291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives:  Caregivers of persons living with serious illness suffer from stress, anxiety and depression. We aim to assess caregiver strain, quality of life (QOL) and bereavement of caregivers of patients enrolled in Emergency Medicine Palliative Care Access (EMPallA), a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Methods: Patients and caregivers were recruited between April 2018 and June 2022 in 18 emergency departments in the USA. Caregiver inclusion criteria were 18 years or older, spoke English or Spanish, and were primary caregivers of enrolled patients. We randomised patient-caregiver dyads at the patient level. Caregivers were encouraged to accompany patients in both care models (nurse-led telephonic palliative care or specialty palliative care), although there was no specific caregiver intervention. We performed mixed effects linear regression models to assess change in caregiver strain and QOL at 6 months and bereavement.

Results: Among 323 caregivers, mean age was 56.9 (SD 14.2), 221 (68%) were female and 77 (24%) were Black. The analysis did not reveal any differences in caregiver strain, QOL, and bereavement between the two care models. The estimated difference in average change in strain scores between groups was -1.6 points (95% CI: -3.4 to 0.3), average change in caregiver physical QOL was 0.5 (95% CI: -0.9 to 1.8), average change in caregiver mental health QOL was 1.8 (95% CI: -0.1 to 3.6) and average change in bereavement scores was 1.8 (95% CI: -2.9 to 6.6).

Conclusions: The study did not demonstrate that nurse-led telephonic care improved caregiver strain, QOL or bereavement outcomes compared with traditional outpatient palliative care.

Trial registration number: NCT03325985.

护理人员结果在护士主导的电话与专业姑息治疗重症。
目标: 严重疾病患者的照顾者承受着压力、焦虑和抑郁。我们的目的是评估参加急诊医学姑息治疗途径(EMPallA)的患者的照顾者压力、生活质量(QOL)和丧恸感,这是一项多中心随机对照试验。方法:2018年4月至2022年6月,在美国18个急诊科招募患者和护理人员。护理人员纳入标准为18岁或以上,会说英语或西班牙语,并且是入组患者的主要护理人员。我们在患者水平随机分组了患者-护理者二人组。鼓励护理人员在两种护理模式(护士主导的电话姑息治疗或专业姑息治疗)中陪伴患者,尽管没有具体的护理人员干预。我们采用混合效应线性回归模型来评估6个月和丧亲时照顾者压力和生活质量的变化。结果:323名护理人员平均年龄56.9岁(SD 14.2),女性221名(68%),黑人77名(24%)。分析没有发现两种护理模式在照顾者压力、生活质量和丧亲感方面有任何差异。组间压力评分的平均变化估计差异为-1.6分(95% CI: -3.4至0.3),照顾者身体生活质量的平均变化为0.5分(95% CI: -0.9至1.8),照顾者心理健康生活质量的平均变化为1.8分(95% CI: -0.1至3.6),丧亲感评分的平均变化为1.8分(95% CI: -2.9至6.6)。结论:与传统的门诊姑息治疗相比,该研究并未证明护士主导的电话护理改善了护理者的压力、生活质量或丧亲结局。试验注册号:NCT03325985。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书