Superior reduction quality without improved outcomes: open versus closed reduction for displaced femoral neck fractures in adults under 60 years

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jia-En Chi, Chang-Heng Liu, Youh-Hua Lo, Chih-Yang Lai, I-Jung Chen, Yi-Hsun Yu
{"title":"Superior reduction quality without improved outcomes: open versus closed reduction for displaced femoral neck fractures in adults under 60 years","authors":"Jia-En Chi,&nbsp;Chang-Heng Liu,&nbsp;Youh-Hua Lo,&nbsp;Chih-Yang Lai,&nbsp;I-Jung Chen,&nbsp;Yi-Hsun Yu","doi":"10.1007/s00402-026-06475-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The optimal reduction strategy for displaced femoral neck fractures (DFNFs) in non-elderly adults remains controversial. Although open reduction may improve radiographic alignment, its impact on outcomes remains unclear. </p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Adults aged &lt; 60 years with DFNFs who were treated with internal fixation between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into closed and open reduction groups. Reduction quality was assessed using the Garden alignment index and the Haidukewych reduction criteria. Multivariate analyses were performed for the overall cohort and patients with Pauwels type III fractures. Outcomes included non-union, osteonecrosis, femoral neck shortening, and major reoperations. </p><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 98 patients were included, among whom 83 and 15 underwent closed and open reduction, respectively. Although open reduction achieved a higher rate of excellent <i>reduction</i> (53.3% vs. 16.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.012), it was not associated with lower rates of non-union or osteonecrosis. In the overall cohort, age was associated with non-union (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; <i>p</i> = 0.024), whereas poorer reduction quality was associated with major reoperation (fair: OR 7.03, <i>p</i> = 0.012; poor: OR 47.6, <i>p</i> = 0.007). In patients with Pauwels type III fractures, poorer reduction quality predicted conversion to arthroplasty (fair: OR 9.84, <i>p</i> = 0.014), and age was associated with non-union and osteonecrosis. Femoral neck shortening of &gt; 10 mm at 3 months was associated with age and open reduction, whereas at 12 months, age and intraoperative blood loss remained significant predictors. </p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Open reduction achieved a higher rate of excellent reduction but did not reduce complication rates compared with closed reduction. Fracture severity, patient age, and reduction quality remained the principal determinants of outcome, supporting a fracture morphology-guided fixation strategy and realistic patient counseling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"146 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-026-06475-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-026-06475-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The optimal reduction strategy for displaced femoral neck fractures (DFNFs) in non-elderly adults remains controversial. Although open reduction may improve radiographic alignment, its impact on outcomes remains unclear.

Materials and methods

Adults aged < 60 years with DFNFs who were treated with internal fixation between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into closed and open reduction groups. Reduction quality was assessed using the Garden alignment index and the Haidukewych reduction criteria. Multivariate analyses were performed for the overall cohort and patients with Pauwels type III fractures. Outcomes included non-union, osteonecrosis, femoral neck shortening, and major reoperations.

Results

In total, 98 patients were included, among whom 83 and 15 underwent closed and open reduction, respectively. Although open reduction achieved a higher rate of excellent reduction (53.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.012), it was not associated with lower rates of non-union or osteonecrosis. In the overall cohort, age was associated with non-union (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; p = 0.024), whereas poorer reduction quality was associated with major reoperation (fair: OR 7.03, p = 0.012; poor: OR 47.6, p = 0.007). In patients with Pauwels type III fractures, poorer reduction quality predicted conversion to arthroplasty (fair: OR 9.84, p = 0.014), and age was associated with non-union and osteonecrosis. Femoral neck shortening of > 10 mm at 3 months was associated with age and open reduction, whereas at 12 months, age and intraoperative blood loss remained significant predictors.

Conclusions

Open reduction achieved a higher rate of excellent reduction but did not reduce complication rates compared with closed reduction. Fracture severity, patient age, and reduction quality remained the principal determinants of outcome, supporting a fracture morphology-guided fixation strategy and realistic patient counseling.

60岁以下成人移位性股骨颈骨折开放性复位与闭合性复位相比,复位质量更高,但结果没有改善。
非老年人移位性股骨颈骨折(DFNFs)的最佳复位策略仍存在争议。尽管切开复位可以改善x线对准,但其对预后的影响尚不清楚。结果:共纳入98例患者,其中闭合复位83例,切开复位15例。尽管切开复位获得了更高的良好复位率(53.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.012),但它与较低的骨不愈合或骨坏死率无关。在整个队列中,年龄与骨不连相关(优势比[OR], 1.09; p = 0.024),而复位质量较差与主要的再手术相关(中等:OR 7.03, p = 0.012;较差:OR 47.6, p = 0.007)。在Pauwels III型骨折患者中,较差的复位质量预示着关节置换术的转变(公平:OR 9.84, p = 0.014),年龄与骨不愈合和骨坏死相关。3个月时股骨颈缩短bbb10mm与年龄和切开复位相关,而在12个月时,年龄和术中出血量仍然是重要的预测因素。结论:与闭合复位相比,切开复位获得了更高的良好复位率,但并没有减少并发症的发生率。骨折严重程度、患者年龄和复位质量仍然是结果的主要决定因素,支持骨折形态引导的固定策略和切合实际的患者咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书