Waste collection fleet and operational cost under final disposal site (TPA) relocation crisis: a multi-scenario analysis for South Tangerang City, Indonesia

IF 3.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Machmuddin Fitra Miftahadi, Indriyani Rachman, Toru Matsumoto
{"title":"Waste collection fleet and operational cost under final disposal site (TPA) relocation crisis: a multi-scenario analysis for South Tangerang City, Indonesia","authors":"Machmuddin Fitra Miftahadi,&nbsp;Indriyani Rachman,&nbsp;Toru Matsumoto","doi":"10.1007/s10163-026-02696-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The closure of the Cipeucang final disposal site (TPA) on 8 December 2025 triggered a waste-management crisis in South Tangerang City (Tangsel), a Jakarta satellite city generating about 1,100 tonnes of municipal solid waste per day. Building on a previously validated and optimised collection network, this study evaluates four post-closure relocation scenarios in terms of fleet size, round-trip frequency, fuel use, and operational cost. SC1 is the closed baseline (≈ 5 km haul to Cipeucang, reference only). SC2 routes all waste to TPSA Cilowong, Serang (≈ 65 km), reflecting the operational reality of 120 t/d carried by 30 trucks by February 2026. SC3 routes all waste to TPA Bangkonol, Pandeglang (≈ 82 km). SC4 is a 50:50 hybrid split between Cilowong and Bangkonol. The analysis shows that moving from SC1 to SC3 raises the annual operating cost by about 325% (from USD 0.90 million to USD 3.81 million per year) and reduces the effective round trips per truck per day from 2.3 to 0.6, forcing a 3.8-fold fleet expansion from 62 to 235 trucks to maintain the existing 367.5 t/d collection coverage; the SC4 hybrid requires 173 trucks (a 2.8-fold expansion). Among the long-haul options, SC4 offers the most robust per-tonne cost when both sites must be used, although routing all waste to the nearer Cilowong site (SC2) is the lowest-cost single-destination option. A transfer-station architecture (SC3+/SC4+) cuts the required fleet-expansion capital by 70–80%. These findings show that the four-year Rp 190.8 billion Bangkonol transport budget omits the transport operating cost (about 57% of the budget) and provide a transferable framework for the many Indonesian cities that must relocate their disposal sites under the national open-dumping closure mandate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"28 5","pages":"4688 - 4699"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-026-02696-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The closure of the Cipeucang final disposal site (TPA) on 8 December 2025 triggered a waste-management crisis in South Tangerang City (Tangsel), a Jakarta satellite city generating about 1,100 tonnes of municipal solid waste per day. Building on a previously validated and optimised collection network, this study evaluates four post-closure relocation scenarios in terms of fleet size, round-trip frequency, fuel use, and operational cost. SC1 is the closed baseline (≈ 5 km haul to Cipeucang, reference only). SC2 routes all waste to TPSA Cilowong, Serang (≈ 65 km), reflecting the operational reality of 120 t/d carried by 30 trucks by February 2026. SC3 routes all waste to TPA Bangkonol, Pandeglang (≈ 82 km). SC4 is a 50:50 hybrid split between Cilowong and Bangkonol. The analysis shows that moving from SC1 to SC3 raises the annual operating cost by about 325% (from USD 0.90 million to USD 3.81 million per year) and reduces the effective round trips per truck per day from 2.3 to 0.6, forcing a 3.8-fold fleet expansion from 62 to 235 trucks to maintain the existing 367.5 t/d collection coverage; the SC4 hybrid requires 173 trucks (a 2.8-fold expansion). Among the long-haul options, SC4 offers the most robust per-tonne cost when both sites must be used, although routing all waste to the nearer Cilowong site (SC2) is the lowest-cost single-destination option. A transfer-station architecture (SC3+/SC4+) cuts the required fleet-expansion capital by 70–80%. These findings show that the four-year Rp 190.8 billion Bangkonol transport budget omits the transport operating cost (about 57% of the budget) and provide a transferable framework for the many Indonesian cities that must relocate their disposal sites under the national open-dumping closure mandate.

最终处理场(TPA)搬迁危机下的废物收集队和运营成本:印度尼西亚南坦格朗市的多情景分析
2025年12月8日,Cipeucang最终处理场(TPA)的关闭引发了南丹格朗市(Tangsel)的废物管理危机。南丹格朗市是雅加达的一个卫星城,每天产生约1100吨城市固体废物。本研究基于先前经过验证和优化的收集网络,从车队规模、往返频率、燃料使用和运营成本等方面评估了四种关闭后的搬迁方案。SC1为封闭基线(距慈浦仓约5公里,仅供参考)。SC2将所有废物运送到Serang的TPSA Cilowong(约65公里),反映了到2026年2月30辆卡车运送120吨/天的运营现实。SC3将所有废物输送到pangdeglang的TPA Bangkonol(约82公里)。SC4是基洛翁和曼谷各半的混合地区。分析显示,从SC1升级到SC3将使年度运营成本提高约325%(从每年90万美元增加到381万美元),并将每辆卡车每天的有效往返次数从2.3次减少到0.6次,迫使车队从62辆扩大到235辆,以维持现有的367.5吨/天的收集覆盖范围;SC4混合动力需要173辆卡车(增加2.8倍)。在长途运输选择中,当两个站点都必须使用时,SC4提供了最稳定的每吨成本,尽管将所有废物运送到更近的Cilowong站点(SC2)是成本最低的单目的地选择。中转站架构(SC3+/SC4+)将所需的车队扩张资金削减了70-80%。这些研究结果表明,四年1,808亿印尼盾的曼谷运输预算忽略了运输运营成本(约占预算的57%),并为许多印度尼西亚城市提供了一个可转让的框架,这些城市必须根据国家露天倾倒关闭命令重新安置其处置地点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书