Nidhi S. Bisht, Clive Trusson, Arun Kumar Tripathy
{"title":"Algorithmic identity regulation in the platform-based gig work of Indian food delivery workers","authors":"Nidhi S. Bisht, Clive Trusson, Arun Kumar Tripathy","doi":"10.1177/00187267261480593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do algorithmic systems regulate worker identities by defining who they are expected to become? Identity regulation research has largely focused on how organizational discourse shapes worker identities. Yet, in platform labour, control is increasingly enacted through algorithmic systems that allocate tasks, monitor performance, and assign reputational scores in real time. Drawing on interviews with delivery partners and platform managers, supplemented by multi-source data, we examine how such systems shape the identities workers are encouraged to adopt or avoid, and how they engage with these processes. We make two key contributions. First, we theorize algorithmic identity regulation as a computational, sociomaterial, and affective form of normative control, whereby digital infrastructures continuously evaluate, rank, and allocate work, recalibrating workers’ identities through ongoing cycles of recognition, visibility, and devaluation. Second, we show how algorithmic identity regulation reshapes dignity at work by rendering recognition continuous, depersonalized, and datafied, making workers’ sense of worth increasingly contingent on algorithmic evaluation. In doing so, we show that algorithmic control not only manages work but shapes how workers define their value, worth, and place in the labour process.","PeriodicalId":48433,"journal":{"name":"Human Relations","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267261480593","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
How do algorithmic systems regulate worker identities by defining who they are expected to become? Identity regulation research has largely focused on how organizational discourse shapes worker identities. Yet, in platform labour, control is increasingly enacted through algorithmic systems that allocate tasks, monitor performance, and assign reputational scores in real time. Drawing on interviews with delivery partners and platform managers, supplemented by multi-source data, we examine how such systems shape the identities workers are encouraged to adopt or avoid, and how they engage with these processes. We make two key contributions. First, we theorize algorithmic identity regulation as a computational, sociomaterial, and affective form of normative control, whereby digital infrastructures continuously evaluate, rank, and allocate work, recalibrating workers’ identities through ongoing cycles of recognition, visibility, and devaluation. Second, we show how algorithmic identity regulation reshapes dignity at work by rendering recognition continuous, depersonalized, and datafied, making workers’ sense of worth increasingly contingent on algorithmic evaluation. In doing so, we show that algorithmic control not only manages work but shapes how workers define their value, worth, and place in the labour process.
期刊介绍:
Human Relations is an international peer reviewed journal, which publishes the highest quality original research to advance our understanding of social relationships at and around work through theoretical development and empirical investigation. Scope Human Relations seeks high quality research papers that extend our knowledge of social relationships at work and organizational forms, practices and processes that affect the nature, structure and conditions of work and work organizations. Human Relations welcomes manuscripts that seek to cross disciplinary boundaries in order to develop new perspectives and insights into social relationships and relationships between people and organizations. Human Relations encourages strong empirical contributions that develop and extend theory as well as more conceptual papers that integrate, critique and expand existing theory. Human Relations welcomes critical reviews and essays: - Critical reviews advance a field through new theory, new methods, a novel synthesis of extant evidence, or a combination of two or three of these elements. Reviews that identify new research questions and that make links between management and organizations and the wider social sciences are particularly welcome. Surveys or overviews of a field are unlikely to meet these criteria. - Critical essays address contemporary scholarly issues and debates within the journal''s scope. They are more controversial than conventional papers or reviews, and can be shorter. They argue a point of view, but must meet standards of academic rigour. Anyone with an idea for a critical essay is particularly encouraged to discuss it at an early stage with the Editor-in-Chief. Human Relations encourages research that relates social theory to social practice and translates knowledge about human relations into prospects for social action and policy-making that aims to improve working lives.