Algorithmic identity regulation in the platform-based gig work of Indian food delivery workers

IF 4.6 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Nidhi S. Bisht, Clive Trusson, Arun Kumar Tripathy
{"title":"Algorithmic identity regulation in the platform-based gig work of Indian food delivery workers","authors":"Nidhi S. Bisht, Clive Trusson, Arun Kumar Tripathy","doi":"10.1177/00187267261480593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do algorithmic systems regulate worker identities by defining who they are expected to become? Identity regulation research has largely focused on how organizational discourse shapes worker identities. Yet, in platform labour, control is increasingly enacted through algorithmic systems that allocate tasks, monitor performance, and assign reputational scores in real time. Drawing on interviews with delivery partners and platform managers, supplemented by multi-source data, we examine how such systems shape the identities workers are encouraged to adopt or avoid, and how they engage with these processes. We make two key contributions. First, we theorize algorithmic identity regulation as a computational, sociomaterial, and affective form of normative control, whereby digital infrastructures continuously evaluate, rank, and allocate work, recalibrating workers’ identities through ongoing cycles of recognition, visibility, and devaluation. Second, we show how algorithmic identity regulation reshapes dignity at work by rendering recognition continuous, depersonalized, and datafied, making workers’ sense of worth increasingly contingent on algorithmic evaluation. In doing so, we show that algorithmic control not only manages work but shapes how workers define their value, worth, and place in the labour process.","PeriodicalId":48433,"journal":{"name":"Human Relations","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267261480593","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do algorithmic systems regulate worker identities by defining who they are expected to become? Identity regulation research has largely focused on how organizational discourse shapes worker identities. Yet, in platform labour, control is increasingly enacted through algorithmic systems that allocate tasks, monitor performance, and assign reputational scores in real time. Drawing on interviews with delivery partners and platform managers, supplemented by multi-source data, we examine how such systems shape the identities workers are encouraged to adopt or avoid, and how they engage with these processes. We make two key contributions. First, we theorize algorithmic identity regulation as a computational, sociomaterial, and affective form of normative control, whereby digital infrastructures continuously evaluate, rank, and allocate work, recalibrating workers’ identities through ongoing cycles of recognition, visibility, and devaluation. Second, we show how algorithmic identity regulation reshapes dignity at work by rendering recognition continuous, depersonalized, and datafied, making workers’ sense of worth increasingly contingent on algorithmic evaluation. In doing so, we show that algorithmic control not only manages work but shapes how workers define their value, worth, and place in the labour process.
印度外卖工平台零工中的算法身份监管
算法系统如何通过定义员工应该成为什么样的人来规范他们的身份?身份规制研究主要集中在组织话语如何塑造员工身份。然而,在平台劳动中,控制越来越多地通过算法系统来实施,这些算法系统可以实时分配任务、监控绩效并分配声誉分数。通过对交付合作伙伴和平台管理人员的采访,并辅以多源数据,我们研究了这些系统如何塑造员工被鼓励采用或避免的身份,以及他们如何参与这些流程。我们做出了两项重要贡献。首先,我们将算法身份监管理论化,将其作为规范控制的计算、社会材料和情感形式,通过数字基础设施不断评估、排名和分配工作,通过持续的识别、可见性和贬值周期重新校准工人的身份。其次,我们展示了算法身份监管如何通过使识别持续、去个性化和数据化来重塑工作中的尊严,使工人的价值感越来越依赖于算法评估。在此过程中,我们展示了算法控制不仅管理工作,而且塑造了工人如何定义自己的价值、价值和在劳动过程中的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Relations
Human Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
7.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Human Relations is an international peer reviewed journal, which publishes the highest quality original research to advance our understanding of social relationships at and around work through theoretical development and empirical investigation. Scope Human Relations seeks high quality research papers that extend our knowledge of social relationships at work and organizational forms, practices and processes that affect the nature, structure and conditions of work and work organizations. Human Relations welcomes manuscripts that seek to cross disciplinary boundaries in order to develop new perspectives and insights into social relationships and relationships between people and organizations. Human Relations encourages strong empirical contributions that develop and extend theory as well as more conceptual papers that integrate, critique and expand existing theory. Human Relations welcomes critical reviews and essays: - Critical reviews advance a field through new theory, new methods, a novel synthesis of extant evidence, or a combination of two or three of these elements. Reviews that identify new research questions and that make links between management and organizations and the wider social sciences are particularly welcome. Surveys or overviews of a field are unlikely to meet these criteria. - Critical essays address contemporary scholarly issues and debates within the journal''s scope. They are more controversial than conventional papers or reviews, and can be shorter. They argue a point of view, but must meet standards of academic rigour. Anyone with an idea for a critical essay is particularly encouraged to discuss it at an early stage with the Editor-in-Chief. Human Relations encourages research that relates social theory to social practice and translates knowledge about human relations into prospects for social action and policy-making that aims to improve working lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书