Impact of Cavity Shaving on Margin Status and Re-excision Rates in Breast-Conserving Surgery: Experience from a Single Institute.

Archives of breast cancer Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-22 DOI:10.32768/abc.533896027-451
Deepti Jain, Sara Abbott, Fadi Zaiem, Marya Wahidi, Zade Kazziha, Nagla E Salem, Mayyadah Al-Nuaimi, Hyejeong Jang, Seongho Kim, Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay, Rouba Ali Fehmi
{"title":"Impact of Cavity Shaving on Margin Status and Re-excision Rates in Breast-Conserving Surgery: Experience from a Single Institute.","authors":"Deepti Jain, Sara Abbott, Fadi Zaiem, Marya Wahidi, Zade Kazziha, Nagla E Salem, Mayyadah Al-Nuaimi, Hyejeong Jang, Seongho Kim, Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay, Rouba Ali Fehmi","doi":"10.32768/abc.533896027-451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The comparative outcomes of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with and without cavity shave margins (CSM) are not well established, despite prior randomized and observational studies, due to heterogeneity in patient populations and margin definitions. We aim to evaluate the impact of each procedure on final margin status and subsequent re-excision rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study comprising 529 women who underwent either BCS with CSM or BCS without CSM between 2013 and 2015 for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), or both at Detroit Medical Center, Michigan. Data, including final margin status (inked and close margin) and re-excision status, were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis revealed no significant reduction in the incidence of positive margins (involved and tumor within 2 mm) among patients who underwent either procedure. In the univariable analysis, patients without lymph node (LN) metastases, those who underwent BCS with CSM, and those with pure IDC had a decreased risk of re-excision compared with those without LN sampling and those with only DCIS (all <i>P</i> < 0.001), respectively. These factors also remained significant in multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although no significant difference was observed between the 2 procedures in reducing the incidence of positive margins among patients with only IDC, only DCIS, and both IDC and DCIS, CSM showed a lower need for re-excision, particularly in cases with pure IDC.</p>","PeriodicalId":524204,"journal":{"name":"Archives of breast cancer","volume":"13 2","pages":"200-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13575923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32768/abc.533896027-451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The comparative outcomes of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with and without cavity shave margins (CSM) are not well established, despite prior randomized and observational studies, due to heterogeneity in patient populations and margin definitions. We aim to evaluate the impact of each procedure on final margin status and subsequent re-excision rates.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study comprising 529 women who underwent either BCS with CSM or BCS without CSM between 2013 and 2015 for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), or both at Detroit Medical Center, Michigan. Data, including final margin status (inked and close margin) and re-excision status, were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results: Our analysis revealed no significant reduction in the incidence of positive margins (involved and tumor within 2 mm) among patients who underwent either procedure. In the univariable analysis, patients without lymph node (LN) metastases, those who underwent BCS with CSM, and those with pure IDC had a decreased risk of re-excision compared with those without LN sampling and those with only DCIS (all P < 0.001), respectively. These factors also remained significant in multivariable analysis.

Conclusion: Although no significant difference was observed between the 2 procedures in reducing the incidence of positive margins among patients with only IDC, only DCIS, and both IDC and DCIS, CSM showed a lower need for re-excision, particularly in cases with pure IDC.

在保乳手术中,刮除腔对切缘状态和再切率的影响:来自单一研究所的经验。
背景:由于患者群体和切口定义的异质性,尽管之前有随机和观察性研究,但有和没有腔剃缘(CSM)的保乳手术(BCS)的比较结果并没有很好地确定。我们的目的是评估每个手术对最终切缘状态和随后的再切除率的影响。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,包括529名2013年至2015年间在密歇根州底特律医疗中心因导管原位癌(DCIS)、浸润性导管癌(IDC)或两者兼有接受BCS合并CSM或不接受CSM的女性。收集数据,包括最终切缘状态(上墨和闭合切缘)和再次切除状态。统计分析采用单变量和多变量logistic回归分析。结果:我们的分析显示,在接受两种手术的患者中,阳性切缘(累及和肿瘤在2mm内)的发生率没有显著降低。在单变量分析中,与没有淋巴结(LN)转移的患者、接受BCS合并CSM的患者和单纯IDC的患者相比,再次切除的风险分别降低了(P均< 0.001)。这些因素在多变量分析中也保持显著性。结论:虽然两种手术方式在降低单纯IDC、单纯DCIS、同时IDC和DCIS患者的阳性切缘发生率方面无显著差异,但CSM再次切除的需求较低,尤其是单纯IDC患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书