Comparative Evaluation of Microbial Transfer in Intermittent Catheters: An in vitro Study of Protective Features Against Uropathogens.

IF 1.8
Nicole L Dean, Mariely Medina-Rivera, Daniel Gordon, George Skountrianos, Abdullah I Mafiz, James Gras, Aaron Strickland, Tadas S Sileika, Michael Craven
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Microbial Transfer in Intermittent Catheters: An in vitro Study of Protective Features Against Uropathogens.","authors":"Nicole L Dean, Mariely Medina-Rivera, Daniel Gordon, George Skountrianos, Abdullah I Mafiz, James Gras, Aaron Strickland, Tadas S Sileika, Michael Craven","doi":"10.1097/WON.0000000000001326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated whether protective features incorporated into commercially available intermittent catheter (IC) types reduce microbial transfer contamination during catheterization.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A previously developed in vitro Contamination Touch Transfer Method (CTTM) was used to model microbial transfer during catheter handling and insertion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four hydrophilic intermittent catheters (ICs) from 2 brands (TSC-A, TSC-B; SC-1, SC-2) and 2 French sizes (14 Fr, 16 Fr) were evaluated in an in vitro simulated urinary tract model. The TSC-A and TSC-B incorporated a ring cap, introducer tip, and protective sleeve, whereas SC-1 and SC-2 incorporated a protective sleeve only. To assess microbial contamination under worst-case conditions, the model meatus and operator's gloved hands were inoculated with approximately 10 8 colony-forming units of Candida albicans , Escherichia coli , or Enterococcus faecium . Microbial recovery from catheter segments was analyzed on the log 10 CFU scale using Tobit mixed-effects models to account for enumeration method-specific limits of quantification and experimental replicate effects. Sleeved catheter segments were compared with corresponding unsleeved controls, and catheter-type differences were evaluated for the first 2-inch (5 cm) catheter segment within each microorganism and French size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sleeved catheter segments generally showed lower transfer contamination than corresponding unsleeved controls, with 46 of 48 planned comparisons statistically significant after Holm adjustment. There were statistically significant overall catheter-type differences within all 6 Microbe x French size families. TSC catheter types incorporating a ring cap, introducer tip, and sleeve had significantly lower transfer contamination than sleeve-only SC catheter types in 21 of 24 planned cross-type comparisons. Separation was most consistent for C. albicans and E. faecium across both French sizes. For E. coli , TSC catheter types had significantly lower transfer contamination than SC catheter types at 14 Fr, but fewer pairwise comparisons were significant at 16 Fr.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that catheter protective features reduce microbial transfer contamination to the underlying catheter tube. Under this in vitro transfer contamination model, IC designs incorporating a ring cap, introducer tip, and protective sleeve provided more consistent reduction in transfer contamination than sleeve-only designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":520700,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000001326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated whether protective features incorporated into commercially available intermittent catheter (IC) types reduce microbial transfer contamination during catheterization.

Design: A previously developed in vitro Contamination Touch Transfer Method (CTTM) was used to model microbial transfer during catheter handling and insertion.

Materials and methods: Four hydrophilic intermittent catheters (ICs) from 2 brands (TSC-A, TSC-B; SC-1, SC-2) and 2 French sizes (14 Fr, 16 Fr) were evaluated in an in vitro simulated urinary tract model. The TSC-A and TSC-B incorporated a ring cap, introducer tip, and protective sleeve, whereas SC-1 and SC-2 incorporated a protective sleeve only. To assess microbial contamination under worst-case conditions, the model meatus and operator's gloved hands were inoculated with approximately 10 8 colony-forming units of Candida albicans , Escherichia coli , or Enterococcus faecium . Microbial recovery from catheter segments was analyzed on the log 10 CFU scale using Tobit mixed-effects models to account for enumeration method-specific limits of quantification and experimental replicate effects. Sleeved catheter segments were compared with corresponding unsleeved controls, and catheter-type differences were evaluated for the first 2-inch (5 cm) catheter segment within each microorganism and French size.

Results: Sleeved catheter segments generally showed lower transfer contamination than corresponding unsleeved controls, with 46 of 48 planned comparisons statistically significant after Holm adjustment. There were statistically significant overall catheter-type differences within all 6 Microbe x French size families. TSC catheter types incorporating a ring cap, introducer tip, and sleeve had significantly lower transfer contamination than sleeve-only SC catheter types in 21 of 24 planned cross-type comparisons. Separation was most consistent for C. albicans and E. faecium across both French sizes. For E. coli , TSC catheter types had significantly lower transfer contamination than SC catheter types at 14 Fr, but fewer pairwise comparisons were significant at 16 Fr.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that catheter protective features reduce microbial transfer contamination to the underlying catheter tube. Under this in vitro transfer contamination model, IC designs incorporating a ring cap, introducer tip, and protective sleeve provided more consistent reduction in transfer contamination than sleeve-only designs.

间歇导尿管中微生物转移的比较评价:对尿路病原体保护特性的体外研究。
目的:本研究评估在市面上可买到的间歇性导管(IC)中加入的保护功能是否能减少置管过程中的微生物转移污染。设计:使用先前开发的体外污染触摸转移方法(CTTM)来模拟导管处理和插入过程中的微生物转移。材料和方法:采用体外模拟尿路模型对2种品牌(TSC-A、TSC-B、SC-1、SC-2)和2种法国规格(14fr、16fr)的4根亲水性间歇性导尿管(ic)进行评价。TSC-A和TSC-B包括环帽、介绍器尖端和保护套,而SC-1和SC-2仅包括保护套。为了评估最坏情况下的微生物污染情况,模型模型和操作员戴着手套的手上接种了大约108个白色念珠菌、大肠杆菌或粪肠球菌菌落形成单位。采用Tobit混合效应模型在log10 CFU量表上分析导管段的微生物回收率,以考虑计数方法的定量限制和实验重复效应。将套管导管段与相应的未套管导管段进行比较,并评估每个微生物内的前2英寸(5厘米)导管段和法国尺寸的导管类型差异。结果:套筒导管段的转移污染普遍低于相应的未套筒导管段,在Holm调整后的48个计划比较中有46个具有统计学意义。在所有6个Microbe x French大小家族中,导管类型的总体差异具有统计学意义。在24个计划的交叉类型比较中,有21个包含环帽、引入器尖端和套筒的TSC导管类型的转移污染明显低于仅套筒的SC导管类型。白色念珠菌和粪肠杆菌的分离在两个法国大小中是最一致的。对于大肠杆菌,在14fr时,TSC导管类型的转移污染明显低于SC导管类型,但在16fr时,两两比较的显著性较少。结论:这些研究结果表明,导管保护特性减少了对底层导管的微生物转移污染。在这种体外转移污染模型下,集成电路设计包含环帽、引入器尖端和保护套筒,比只有套筒的设计更能一致地减少转移污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书