{"title":"SBUF-SMUF: On the path to the optimum hemofiltration technique in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Mehrtash Shadmehr, Babar Ali, Rosa Abdollahzadeh, Khalil Zarrabi, Hamid Gerami, Salman Parvaiz Butt","doi":"10.1051/ject/2026020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemofiltration during pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is essential to mitigate hemodilution, inflammatory responses, and postoperative complications. Conventional ultrafiltration (CUF) is widely practiced, but novel methods such as subzero balanced ultrafiltration combined with simple modified ultrafiltration (SBUF-SMUF) may offer superior outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of CUF versus SBUF-SMUF in pediatric patients undergoing open-heart surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized, outcome-assessor-blinded clinical trial, 80 pediatric patients with congenital heart disease were allocated to either CUF (n = 40) or SBUF-SMUF (n = 40) during CPB. Baseline demographics, intraoperative characteristics, fluid balance, blood product utilization, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. Statistical analysis was conducted using independent t-tests, Chi-square tests, and Fisher's exact tests. Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed p-Value of less than 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic and preoperative variables were comparable between groups. Mean fluid balance was significantly positive in the CUF group (+192.1 ± 178.8 mL) but negative in the SBUF-SMUF group (-105.0 ± 78.9 mL, p < 0.001). The SBUF-SMUF group required significantly less intraoperative PRBC (141.7 ± 70.2 vs. 261.0 ± 68.8 mL, p < 0.001) and postoperative FFP transfusion (2% vs. 10%, p = 0.020). Post-bypass hematocrit levels were higher (31.2% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.001) and extubation occurred earlier in the SBUF-SMUF group (1.05 ± 1.03 vs. 2.27 ± 2.37 days, p = 0.006). No significant differences were observed in potassium levels or incidence of acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SBUF-SMUF technique is safe, effective, and superior to CUF in optimizing fluid balance, reducing blood product utilization, and facilitating earlier extubation in pediatric cardiac surgery. No additional risk of oliguria or electrolyte imbalance was observed compared to CUF. Its simplicity and reproducibility support its consideration as a standard approach in pediatric CPB.</p>","PeriodicalId":519952,"journal":{"name":"The journal of extra-corporeal technology","volume":"58 3","pages":"228-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13577640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of extra-corporeal technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2026020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hemofiltration during pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is essential to mitigate hemodilution, inflammatory responses, and postoperative complications. Conventional ultrafiltration (CUF) is widely practiced, but novel methods such as subzero balanced ultrafiltration combined with simple modified ultrafiltration (SBUF-SMUF) may offer superior outcomes.
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of CUF versus SBUF-SMUF in pediatric patients undergoing open-heart surgery.
Methods: In this prospective randomized, outcome-assessor-blinded clinical trial, 80 pediatric patients with congenital heart disease were allocated to either CUF (n = 40) or SBUF-SMUF (n = 40) during CPB. Baseline demographics, intraoperative characteristics, fluid balance, blood product utilization, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. Statistical analysis was conducted using independent t-tests, Chi-square tests, and Fisher's exact tests. Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed p-Value of less than 0.05.
Results: Demographic and preoperative variables were comparable between groups. Mean fluid balance was significantly positive in the CUF group (+192.1 ± 178.8 mL) but negative in the SBUF-SMUF group (-105.0 ± 78.9 mL, p < 0.001). The SBUF-SMUF group required significantly less intraoperative PRBC (141.7 ± 70.2 vs. 261.0 ± 68.8 mL, p < 0.001) and postoperative FFP transfusion (2% vs. 10%, p = 0.020). Post-bypass hematocrit levels were higher (31.2% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.001) and extubation occurred earlier in the SBUF-SMUF group (1.05 ± 1.03 vs. 2.27 ± 2.37 days, p = 0.006). No significant differences were observed in potassium levels or incidence of acute kidney injury.
Conclusion: The SBUF-SMUF technique is safe, effective, and superior to CUF in optimizing fluid balance, reducing blood product utilization, and facilitating earlier extubation in pediatric cardiac surgery. No additional risk of oliguria or electrolyte imbalance was observed compared to CUF. Its simplicity and reproducibility support its consideration as a standard approach in pediatric CPB.
背景:小儿体外循环(CPB)期间的血液滤过对于减轻血液稀释、炎症反应和术后并发症至关重要。传统的超滤(CUF)被广泛应用,但新的方法,如亚零平衡超滤结合简单改性超滤(SBUF-SMUF)可能会提供更好的结果。目的:比较CUF与SBUF-SMUF在小儿心内直视手术中的临床疗效和安全性。方法:在这项前瞻性随机、结果评估盲临床试验中,80例先天性心脏病患儿在CPB期间被分配到CUF (n = 40)或SBUF-SMUF (n = 40)。评估基线人口统计学、术中特征、体液平衡、血液制品利用率和术后结果。统计分析采用独立t检验、卡方检验和Fisher精确检验。统计学显著性定义为双尾p值小于0.05。结果:组间人口学和术前变量具有可比性。平均体液平衡在CUF组为阳性(+192.1±178.8 mL),而在SBUF-SMUF组为阴性(-105.0±78.9 mL, p < 0.001)。SBUF-SMUF组术中PRBC(141.7±70.2 mL vs 261.0±68.8 mL, p < 0.001)和术后FFP输注(2% vs 10%, p = 0.020)显著减少。SBUF-SMUF组旁路后的血细胞比容水平更高(31.2% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.001),拔管时间更早(1.05±1.03 vs. 2.27±2.37天,p = 0.006)。在钾水平和急性肾损伤发生率方面没有观察到显著差异。结论:在小儿心脏手术中,SBUF-SMUF技术安全、有效,且在优化体液平衡、降低血液制品利用率、促进早期拔管方面优于CUF。与CUF相比,未观察到少尿或电解质失衡的额外风险。它的简单性和可重复性支持其考虑作为儿科CPB的标准方法。