Radiofrequency Ablation for Interdigital Neuroma: Moderate 2-Year Outcomes and Surgical Conversion Rate.

IF 2.2
Rodrigo Díaz-Fernández, Paula Martín-de-Salvador, Rocío Valverde-Vázquez, Alejandro Oliver-Grosso
{"title":"Radiofrequency Ablation for Interdigital Neuroma: Moderate 2-Year Outcomes and Surgical Conversion Rate.","authors":"Rodrigo Díaz-Fernández, Paula Martín-de-Salvador, Rocío Valverde-Vázquez, Alejandro Oliver-Grosso","doi":"10.1177/10711007261473603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of interdigital neuroma; however, evidence regarding its midterm effectiveness remains limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate midterm clinical outcomes following RFA, focusing on pain relief, functional improvement, and the need for subsequent surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted including patients with a single symptomatic interdigital neuroma treated with RFA between January 2019 and January 2024. Patients with multiple or bilateral neuromas were excluded. Clinical outcomes were assessed at a minimum follow-up of 2 years using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). A clinically meaningful improvement was defined as a reduction of ≥3 points in VAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three patients were included. A clinically meaningful reduction in VAS was achieved in 65.2% of patients. MOXFQ scores improved (<i>P</i> < .001 for all domains) across all domains, exceeding the minimal clinically important change in pain and function subscales. However, 27.0% of patients ultimately required surgical treatment. No significant predictors of clinical response were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFA was associated with moderate pain and functional improvement in selected patients with interdigital neuroma. Although approximately one-quarter of patients ultimately required surgical treatment, postoperative outcomes remained favorable, supporting RFA as a reasonable intermediate treatment option for appropriately selected patients. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection, realistic preoperative counseling, and further comparative studies with alternative surgical techniques.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, therapeutic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"10711007261473603"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007261473603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of interdigital neuroma; however, evidence regarding its midterm effectiveness remains limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate midterm clinical outcomes following RFA, focusing on pain relief, functional improvement, and the need for subsequent surgery.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted including patients with a single symptomatic interdigital neuroma treated with RFA between January 2019 and January 2024. Patients with multiple or bilateral neuromas were excluded. Clinical outcomes were assessed at a minimum follow-up of 2 years using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). A clinically meaningful improvement was defined as a reduction of ≥3 points in VAS.

Results: Sixty-three patients were included. A clinically meaningful reduction in VAS was achieved in 65.2% of patients. MOXFQ scores improved (P < .001 for all domains) across all domains, exceeding the minimal clinically important change in pain and function subscales. However, 27.0% of patients ultimately required surgical treatment. No significant predictors of clinical response were identified.

Conclusion: RFA was associated with moderate pain and functional improvement in selected patients with interdigital neuroma. Although approximately one-quarter of patients ultimately required surgical treatment, postoperative outcomes remained favorable, supporting RFA as a reasonable intermediate treatment option for appropriately selected patients. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection, realistic preoperative counseling, and further comparative studies with alternative surgical techniques.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

指间神经瘤的射频消融术:中等2年预后和手术转换率。
背景:射频消融(RFA)已成为一种微创治疗指间神经瘤的替代方法;然而,关于其中期有效性的证据仍然有限。本研究的目的是评估RFA后的中期临床结果,重点关注疼痛缓解、功能改善和后续手术的必要性。方法:回顾性观察研究包括2019年1月至2024年1月期间接受RFA治疗的单一症状指间神经瘤患者。排除多发性或双侧神经瘤患者。临床结果在至少2年的随访中使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和曼彻斯特-牛津足问卷(MOXFQ)进行评估。临床有意义的改善定义为VAS评分降低≥3分。结果:纳入63例患者。65.2%的患者达到了有临床意义的VAS降低。结论:RFA与指间神经瘤患者的中度疼痛和功能改善有关。虽然大约四分之一的患者最终需要手术治疗,但术后结果仍然良好,支持RFA作为适当选择患者的合理中间治疗选择。这些发现强调了谨慎的患者选择,现实的术前咨询,以及与替代手术技术的进一步比较研究的必要性。证据等级:四级,治疗性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书